Laserfiche WebLink
Based on the settlement analysis (also tabulated on the spreadsheets in Appendix F) a total <br />dynamic (liquefaction induced) settlement of 5.0=E inches could be expected at Boring No. B-1. <br />The associated differential settlement is estimated to be on the order of 21/2 to 33: inches. The <br />estimated differential settlement could be assumed to occur across a distance of 50 feet, <br />indicating a maximum angular distortion of approximately 0.005 inches per inch. These <br />settlements are considered to be in excess of the tolerances of a typical structure <br />supported on shallow foundations. Therefore, this report provides recommendations <br />for a mat foundation to support the proposed convenience store building. However, it <br />should be noted that even with the use of a mat foundation, minor to moderate repairs, <br />including repair of damaged drywall and stucco, etc., would likely be required after the <br />occurrence of liquefaction-induced settlements. <br />Based on our understanding of the proposed development, it is considered feasible to support <br />the proposed structure on a mat foundation. Such a foundation system can be designed to <br />resist the effects of the anticipated differential settlements, to the extent that the structure <br />would not catastrophically fail.Designing the proposed structure to remain completely <br />undamaged during a seismic event that could occur once every 475 years (the code-specified <br />return period used in the liquefaction analysis) is not considered to be economically feasible. <br />Based on this understanding, the use of a mat foundation system is considered to be the most <br />economical means of supporting the proposed structure. <br />In order to support the proposed structure on a mat foundation the structural engineer should <br />verify that the structures would not catastrophically fail due to the predicted dynamic differential <br />settlements. Any utility connections to the structures should be designed to withstand the <br />estimated differential settlements. It should also be noted that minor to moderate repairs, <br />including re-leveling, restoration of utility connections, repair of damaged drywall and stucco, <br />etc., would likely be required after occurrence of the liquefaction-induced settlements. <br />The use of a mat foundation system, as described in this report, is typical for buildings of this <br />type, where they are underlain the extent of liquefiable soils encountered at this site. The post- <br />liquefaction damage that could occur within the building proposed for this site will also be typical <br />or less than similar buildings in the vicinity of this project. However, if the owner determines that <br />this level of potential damage is not acceptable, other geotechnical and structural options are <br />available, including the use of ground improvement. <br />6.2 Geotechnical Design Considerations <br />General <br />The subsurface conditions encountered at the site generally consist of a surficial layer of fill soils <br />underlain by low to moderate strength native alluvium. The near surface fill soils possess <br />variable strengths and variable composition. Based on these characteristics, and the age of the <br />existing development, the existing fill soils are considered to represent undocumented fill, not <br />suitable for support of the proposed structure. In addition, the upper zone of native alluvium, <br />encountered at depths of 3 to 4 feet is currently in a loose condition and possesses unfavorable <br />'----2 SOUTHERN G&M Convenience Store #72 - Santa Ana, CA <br />4-* CALIFORNIA Project No. 16G123-1R <br />1</ GEOTECHNICAL Page 13 <br />SoCal€;ec