Laserfiche WebLink
Based on the presence of undocumented fill and variable strength alluvial soils throughout the <br />site, it is expected that some isolated areas of additional overexcavation may be required to <br />remove zones of lower strength, unsuitable soils. <br />As noted previously, portions of the subject site are underlain by medium expansive soils. <br />Support of new fiatwork on medium expansive soils carries additional risk with respect to <br />flatwork movement and potential distress. This report provides recommendations for moisture <br />conditioning and additional steel in the flatwork in order to minimize the potential effects of the <br />expansive soils. However, if additional protection against cracking is desired, the client <br />should consider the placement of a 1 to 2 foot thick layer of non-expansive soil <br />beneath all flatwork. <br />Treatment of Existing Soils: Parking Areas <br />Based on economic considerations, overexcavation of the existing fill soils in the new parking <br />areas is not considered warranted, with the exception of areas where lower strength, or <br />unstable, soils are identified by the geotechnical engineer during grading. <br />Subgrade preparation in the new parking areas should initially consist of removal of all soils <br />disturbed during stripping and demolition operations. The geotechnical engineer should then <br />evaluate the subgrade to identify any areas of additional unsuitable soils. The subgrade soils <br />should then be scarified to a depth of 123: inches, moisture conditioned to 2 to 4 percent above <br />optimum moisture content, and recompacted to at least 90 percent of the ASTM D-1557 <br />maximum dry density. <br />The grading recommendations presented above for the proposed parking and drive areas <br />assume that the owner and/or developer can tolerate minor amounts of settlement within the <br />proposed parking areas. The grading recommendations presented above do not completely <br />mitigate the extent of existing undocumented fill soils in the parking areas. As such, settlement <br />and associated pavement distress could occur. Typically, repair of such distressed areas involves <br />significantly lower costs than completely mitigating these soils at the time of construction. If the <br />owner cannot tolerate the risk of such settlements, the parking and drive areas should be <br />overexcavated to a depth of 2 feet below proposed pavement subgrade elevation, with the <br />resulting soils replaced as compacted structural fill. <br />Treatment of Existing Soils: Retaining Walls and Site Walls <br />The existing soils within the areas of any proposed retaining walls should be overexcavated to a <br />depth of 2 feet below foundation bearing grade and replaced as compacted structural fill, as <br />discussed above for the proposed building pad. Any existing undocumented fill soils should also <br />be removed in their entirety. The foundation subgrade soils within the areas of any proposed <br />non-retaining site walls should be overexcavated to a depth of 1 foot below proposed foundation <br />bearing grade. For both types of walls, the overexcavation subgrade soils should be evaluated by <br />the geotechnical engineer prior to scarifying, moisture conditioning and recompacting the upper <br />12 inches of exposed subgrade soils. The previously excavated soils may then be replaced as <br />compacted structural fill. <br />t. _SOUT-HIRA G&M Convenience Store #72 - Santa Ana, CA <br />CALIFORNIA Project No. 16G123-1R <br />GEOTECHNICAL Page 17