Laserfiche WebLink
. · ' • - -01.'127·'- ,. <br />City of Santa Ana ..f.;' .:. P., U. f.Job No: 01-3058-002-01-00 71%7 <br />September 25, 1992 : :1.-14.Log No: 2-2662 <br />Page 9 <br />. . . 1.4-44.' <br />7.CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS <br />7.1 General <br />:1 <br />• i•. 2.i:. 4.4 <br />.. <br />4 <br />a.Based on the results of: . our review, it is' our . 2·20£'4 <br />opinion that the proposed development is feasible:., 04>·:; <br />11.from a geotechnical engineering standpdint,1 , 2.-0 ; <br />provided that the recommendations of this report iti]' <br />are implemented during design,grading .and f :RE:.6 <br />construction. <br />b.We are of the opinion that the proposed structures .4 <br />i can be supported on shallow pad and continuous . ·i <br />.footings founded in compacted fill. <br />«6 <br />ir <br />C.We consider that the anticipated grading will not <br />adversely affect, nor be adversely affected by, <br />adjoining property, with due precautions being <br />taken. <br />d.The design recommendations in this report should be <br />reviewed during the grading phase when soil <br />conditions in the excavations become exposed. <br />e.The foundation plans/design loads,should be <br />reviewed by the Soil Engineer. <br />f. General geotechnical considerations applicable to <br />site grading and recommendations for the design and <br />construction of the project are discussed'below. <br />4-