My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
888 N Main St - Soils Report
PBA
>
Building
>
Soils Reports
>
M
>
Main St
>
888 N Main St
>
888 N Main St - Soils Report
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/23/2022 1:33:53 PM
Creation date
6/23/2022 1:33:29 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Soils Report
Full Address
888 N Main St
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
244
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
4 of 234 <br />Thornton Tomasetti Memorandum <br />Re: Alternative Methods Executive Summary <br />Page 2 <br />4. A field testing program of visual condition assessment, concrete cores, Ground Penetrating <br />Radar (GPR) scans, surface hardness testing and limited x-rays has been completed. <br />Although no existing structural drawings have been found, existing architectural drawings <br />show member profiles consistent with field measurements. <br />5. Site visits for ASCE 41-13 visual condition assessment showed a concrete structural system <br />in good condition, with no significant deterioration at the primary lateral load resisting <br />elements. <br />6. Foundation elements are not visible and will not be tested or probed. This is considered <br />acceptable because Target Building Performance Levels 'c' and 'd' at 50%/50 year Hazard <br />Level imply low seismic demands for which foundation demands from seismic load <br />combinations will be small, of comparable magnitude to those already experienced during its <br />50 year life to date. Subgrade conditions based on original (1960s) soil investigations at this <br />site, and recent investigations nearby sites, are discussed in a geotechnical report to be <br />submitted. <br />7. 'Seismic base' is taken at the Ground Floor for computer modeling, with lateral restraint there. <br />Column continuity through the Ground Floor is modeled by one-story basement columns and <br />existing concrete infill walls between them. Significant Ground Floor lateral restraint is <br />provided by a continuous reinforced concrete slab tied to heavy perimeter basement walls, <br />and by infill walls between tower perimeter columns in the basement itself. For Target <br />Performance Levels 'c' and 'd' this modeling approach is appropriate. <br />8. For alternative improvement models, only viscous diagonal dampers are modeled as <br />nonlinear elements. All other elements are modeled as elastic (with stiffness modifiers). <br />9. For determining after-improvement performance, Tier 3 Nonlinear Response History Analysis <br />(NRHA) uses four input suites spectrally matched to the 73 year mean recurrence interval <br />5% damped spectrum by the geotechnical consultant. For comparison purposes only, <br />Response Spectrum Analysis (RSA) uses the 73 year MRI 15% damped spectrum for after- <br />improvement performance, for comparable base shears to the 73 year NRHA results. <br />10. Columns are anticipated to govern acceptance; the combined depth of typical perimeter <br />beams and integral infill panels is several times larger than typical column widths so beams <br />should not govern. This will be checked.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.