My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
505 S Main St - URM Report
PBA
>
Building
>
URM Reports
>
M
>
Main St
>
505 S Main St
>
505 S Main St - URM Report
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/2/2023 10:52:07 AM
Creation date
6/23/2021 1:43:06 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
URM Report
Full Address
505 S Main St
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
83
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
O o <br />HOFFMAN 8 STEPONOVICH <br />fi o Ftar., c e corrNrY oFFicE: <br />rtsE ORLEANS BUILO!NG <br />SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA 9270I <br />TELEPHONE t7r4) 973 r363 <br />fl .orc BEACH oFFrcE: <br />9/ELLS FARCO E}ANK B U IlDIN G <br />IOO OC EAN 6ATE <br />LONG BEACH, CALIFORNIA 9O8O2 <br />TELEPBONE (2r31 432-4ZOO <br />3378-02 <br />a PPOFEsSTONAL L^w COFpOTA'TON <br />ST E PO N OWIC B, JR <br />Mr. Gary Craig <br />Departnent of Br:ilding Safety <br />City of Santa Ana <br />20 Civic Center Plaza <br />P. 0. Box 1988 <br />Santa Ana, California 92702 <br />IiL Property Address 501 South ln'lain Street and <br />Application of Ordinance I'lt-unber NS 1518 <br />Dear Mr. Craig: <br />We agai.n for courtesy and cooperation. <br />We uanted to again take this opportunity to thank you for the infornation <br />relayed to us irr our telephone conversation of Wednesday, I"larch 18, 1981. <br />Our client is in the process of preparing the necessary sketches to request <br />a reclass if ication of the subject property, pursuant to the referenced <br />ordinance, fron a "high risk bui.lding" to a "nedirln risk building" ' Naturally, <br />as soon as those drawings are cofiplete they will be forwarded to you for <br />cons iderat ion thereon. <br />'Ihis letter will also confirm our conversation with regard to llr ' Grantrs <br />letter of Febrr.rary 24, 1981, wherein it stated that our client originally <br />received notification on Septenber 23, 1980. As we discussed, that date is <br />j.ncorrect and, to be accurate, should read Novenber 12, 1980. With that <br />correction, our client's ti-ne period for appeal will expire on l"lay 11, 1981 <br />and his t irE period for the analysis required by the ordinance would expire <br />on August 9, f981. Naturally, if the reclass if icat ion referenced were <br />granted, those dates would have no significance, as a new notice would be <br />required sonEtime later this year. <br />t <br />NU <br />cc Mr. Kunski <br />ICH, JR.t <br />RECEIVED <br />MAR 2 0 l98l <br />o .IIi UI 5AN IA ANAe-.ara. *Jt. I lile. <br />Ivlarch 18, 1981 <br />OVP F'LE \UMEtFP
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.