410 N Main St - URM Report - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

aO 5. I{ISCELTANEUJS IIYIES A 6 . CiICIIJSICITE: I did go over t].e subject proiect wtth Cary Craiq arrt Bob Taylor atthe Santa Arn Buildirg Department. The strucr-ure in question hasscrne unusual circtrnstances wtrich are as fol lcxs: i) the Buildirq is orenerl Ery thlc seplrate oqrners; thefrone 1/3rd is cruned by Mrs . SaLicX arxf tie rear2/3rd's is or,irre<l bf ltr. arrl l,lrs. pedrini. tt.antl }4rs. Pedrini. as I understan l it, also crnm anadjoinirg music store wtrich has already been up-dated. When the rm:sic store was ufiated, ttre pedrini,s decided against ugiatirg the subiecr_ proiect, butdid secwe scnre professional. advice on what,rcul,l .r:e required. I ha..,e tried to conr_acr_ the perlrini's by phone but have been tmsuccessful . These facts will neerl to be verified and sr,:lcstantiated. ii) The north wall on t}le subject project r,as also a partywall of a buildirg which has since been denDLisheri. The structural integrity of this wall wiII trave to beverified. iii) The buildi-ng as rne, constructed can rrct be easily dividerloff-. It is very desirable if not required that Lhetotal building be brought up to code. iv ) It hras suggested that after t}re c,v.,ners ecIIE to r-errns , a meetirxT be set rlP at the subject site with t}le cr.,ners,the buildirg departnEnt arrl our office. I agree withthis reccmnerrlation c\dnpletely. A The cr",ners neerl to arrarKle for the butLding to be anayzed anrl tohave correcticn drawings prepared. Ihis is reqr.rired per t-he cityof Santa Ana ordina:rce, The a-Lternative is that tie city mayclassify the buildirg as a "Eazardorrs h'i Ldilxl,, arrl proceedagainst the o,vners as specified in the Santa ana Coje. ,irre builrl inqcould also be denol ished as t{as the one to the north. 'Ihere is atine lirit hhich they musr_ rneet, therefore a fj-nal decision isrequired inme<liatety.