Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br /> <br />CARUSO <br />TURLEY <br />SCOTT <br />structural <br />engineers <br />STRUCTURAL <br />ENGINEERING <br />EXPERTS <br /> <br />PARTNERS <br />Sandra Herd, SE, PE, LEED AP <br />Thomas Morris, SE, LEED AP <br />Richard Dahlmann, SE, PE <br />Troy Turley, SE, PE, LEED AP <br />Brady Notbohm, SE, PE <br />PROFESSIONAL <br />REGISTRATION <br /> <br />50 States <br />Washington D.C. <br />U.S. Virgin Islands <br />Puerto Rico <br />1215 W. Rio Salado Pkwy. <br />Suite 200 <br />Tempe, AZ 85281 <br />T: (480) 774-1700 <br />F: (480) 774-1701 <br />www.ctsaz.com <br /> <br /> <br />Date: November 13, 2024 <br /> <br /> <br />Mr. Ryan Heil <br />PanelClaw <br />1600 Osgood Street, Ste. 2023 <br />North Andover, MA 01845 <br /> <br />RE: Evaluation of PanelClaw system <br /> <br />Project Name: CA Target T0286 Santa Ana <br />CTS Job No.: 24-0242-3081.1 <br /> <br />Per the request of Ryan Heil at PanelClaw, CTS was asked to review the <br />PanelClaw racking system with respect to the system’s ability to resist uplift and <br />sliding caused by wind and seismic loads. <br /> <br />Wind Evaluation: <br /> <br />PanelClaw has provided CTS with wind tunnel testing performed by CPP, Inc. The <br />system tested was the “clawFRplus 10 Degree” system. This system consists of <br />photovoltaic panels installed at a 10 degree tilt onto support assemblies. The <br />support assemblies consist of a support frame for the PV panels, wind deflectors <br />and areas for additional mass/weight as required for the ballast loads. <br /> <br />The wind tunnel testing was performed per Chapter 31 of ASCE 7-16. The <br />parameters of the testing were a flat roof system in both Exposure B and C on a <br />building with and without parapets. The testing has resulted in pressure and/or <br />force coefficients that were applied to the velocity pressure qz in order to obtain <br />the wind loads on the PV system. From the wind load results it is then possible to <br />calculate the ballast loads required to resist the uplift and sliding forces. <br /> <br />PanelClaw has provided CTS with the excel tool that was developed to obtain the <br />uplift and sliding forces. CTS has reviewed this tool and the wind forces obtained <br />to find that the amounts of ballast provided are within the values required. <br />Furthermore, CTS agrees with the methodologies used to develop the uplift and <br />sliding forces for the “clawFRplus 10 Degree” system per the wind tunnel testing <br />results. <br /> <br />Seismic Evaluation for Arrays: 1.2-1.12 <br /> <br />Calculations have been provided utilizing the method found in SEAOC PV1 -2012, <br />Section 9 for the use of non -linear response history analysis to determine the <br />seismic displacement of non-structural components located on a roof per SEAOC <br />PV-2012 and ASCE Section 13.6.12. These calculations have determined that the <br />friction generated from the ballast (allowed per CBC Section 1613.3 and ASCE <br />Section 13.6.12 per Section 13.4 exception ) is sufficient to restrict displacement <br />due to seismic forces to acceptable distances, and that no mechanical <br />attachments are required. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />1330 E Seventeenth <br />St4/10/2025