Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br /> <br />Gregory A. Kopp, PhD, PEng <br />Professor <br />Boundary Layer Wind Tunnel Laboratory, Faculty of Engineering, <br />University of Western Ontario, <br />London, ON, N6A 5B9, Canada <br />____________________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br />January 30, 2019 <br /> <br />Dr. Mika Jovanovic <br />PanelClaw, Inc. <br />1600 Osgood St, Suite 2023 <br />North Andover, MA, 01845 <br />United States <br /> <br /> <br />Re: Review of CPP wind tunnel test report 11828 for the Panel Claw 10o Tilt System <br /> <br /> <br />Dear Dr. Jovanovic, <br /> <br />I am writing this letter in response to your request to review the wind tunnel test report by Cermak, <br />Peterka & Peterson (CPP) “Final Report: Wind Tunnel Tests and Load Analysis for PanelClaw roof mount <br />10o Tilt South-Facing, CPP Project 11828”, by Anisa Como and David Banks, dated 2019 January 28. The <br />purpose of this review is to assess whether the approach and analysis used by CPP meets the requirements <br />of ASCE 7-05 Section 6.6.2, ASCE 7-10 Chapter 31, ASCE 7-16 Chapter 31, ASCE 49-12, and SEAOC- <br />PV2-2017. The requirements of ASCE 7-05, ASCE 7-10, and ASCE 49-12 are essentially identical and <br />focus on the requirements of wind tunnel test methods. The SEAOC-PV2-2017 and ASCE 7-16 <br />requirements are also nearly identical but have additional requirements particular to roof-mounted solar <br />arrays wind tunnel test methods when compared to earlier standards. <br />I would note that I have worked with Dr. Banks and Mr. Fewless on a few occasions, primarily with Dr. <br />Banks on several wind-related committees, including the development of the SEAOC recommendations <br />“Wind loads on low profile solar photovoltaic systems on flat roofs and in balloted proposals pertaining to <br />wind loads on roof-mounted solar arrays for ASCE 7-16. We also published a paper together on wind tunnel <br />testing requirements for determining wind loads on roof-mounted solar arrays (G.A. Kopp & D. Banks, 2013, <br />Use of the wind tunnel test method for obtaining design wind loads on roof-mounted solar arrays, ASCE <br />Journal of Structural Engineering, vol. 139(2), pp. 284-287), which helped to inform the SEAOC and ASCE <br />7-16 processes. I wrote a chapter of a book with Mr. Fewless pertaining to wind loads on low-rise buildings <br />for ASCE. However, I can provide this assessment as an independent expert, since I was not involved in <br />any way with the experimental design and analysis described in the CPP report under consideration here. <br />I have the necessary technical expertise pertaining to wind tunnel studies of roof-mounted solar arrays <br />to assess this report. I have conducted numerous wind tunnel studies of roof-mounted solar arrays as part <br />of the Boundary Layer Wind Tunnel Laboratory at the University of Western Ontario. I participated in the <br />development of SEAOC-PV2-2012 and 2017. I am a voting member of the ASCE 7 wind loads <br />subcommittee, and in that role have guided the development of design standards for wind loads on roof- <br />mounted solar arrays and Components & Cladding wind loads, amongst other items. I am also Chair of the <br />ASCE 49 Standards Committee, of which Dr. Banks is a member. I have published several papers on wind <br />effects on roof-mounted solar arrays. I was the Guest Editor for a Special Issue of the Journal of Wind <br />Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics (the leading wind engineering journal in the world) on Wind <br />Effects on Roof-Mounted Solar arrays. <br />CPP have structured their report with an alignment that matches the requirements of these standards. <br />This structure is also used in this review, for clarity. <br /> <br /> <br />PCC2.2.3 <br />1901 N Fairview St & Bldg A, B, <br />C, F & 1919 N Fairview St Bldg E <br />4/11/2024