My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2002 N Main St - URM Report
PBA
>
Building
>
URM Reports
>
M
>
Main St
>
2002 N Main St
>
2002 N Main St - URM Report
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/28/2021 9:04:58 AM
Creation date
7/28/2021 9:04:52 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
URM Report
Full Address
2002 N Main St
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
47
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MEMORANDUM <br />Rex Swa n son <br />To Assistan t ci Manaoe r Darn <br />-Decembpr <br />I 6'- I qB l <br />--- <br />of Bowers l''luseum'' <br />Di rector <br />From Plannin a nd 0evel opment Servi ces <br />Subject Analys i s of the "preliminary evaluation of the structural integrit vbyohn Kariot 'ls <br />Sunma ry <br />l,lhile the Kariotis report goes into specific details of the existing construction,it basically confirms that the "old" Bowers fluseum is an unreinforced masonrybuilding and, legal techn'ica'l ities aside, is subject to the City,s seismic stfety <br />ord i nance. <br />One newly discovered fact is that, after examination of the plans, Kariotis has <br />detennined that the museum may be rec'lass'ified as a class III building rather <br />than the originally assumed class II classification. This will provide more timefor the museum to comply with the ordinance and is based upon an exception in theal features rather than the basic method <br />buildings with interior walls at 40 <br />cl ass I I I regardl ess of occupant I oad ) . <br />Since class III buildings have yet to be notified, we will send a new notice re-vising the classification and record the appropriate documents with the Recorder'soffice in response to this information. <br />ordinance for buildings with certain p <br />of using the calculated occupant loadfeet maximum intervals may be classifi <br />hysic(i.e. <br />ed as <br />The report <br />work is to <br />factor con <br />fi ni s hes " <br />ta i ned, re <br />report sta <br />ma teri a I s <br />ta i nedwill be <br />fu rthe <br />be don <br />pl aci ng <br />tes tha <br />are wel <br />r identifies the specific areas of the building where remedial <br />e and outlines methods of analysis and repair. One importantin the report is that at least for some work "historic wal1 <br />damaged and if the appearance of the structure is to be main- <br />or restoring of these finishes may be cost'ly. Otherwise, thet the structure is sound and tests should confirm that the wa'l II preserved and capable of being utilized in the seismic redesign <br />oa <br />Phil Freeland <br />RJT : rm <br />cc: Dan Stone <br />Rei I ly Rhodey <br />Gary Craiq V
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.