Laserfiche WebLink
CITY OF SANTA ANA <br />Planning and Building Agency <br />Approved <br />The civil/structural design engineer should consult with the project g�paplit� W I T ISSUANCE <br />consultant, if additional geotechnical information is needed for structural seismic design. <br />Faults Master ID: <br />Date: <br />No active faults are known to exist within or near the site. The probabil <br />surface rupture or deformation at the site is, therefore, considered very low. <br />The site is not designated to be located within the Special Studies/Earthquake Zone under <br />the Alquist-Priolo Special Studies Act. <br />Liquefaction Potential <br />Based on the State of California SEISMIC HAZARD ZONES Map, Orange Quadrangle, <br />the subject site is not located within a potential liquefaction zone. Therefore, liquefaction <br />is not anticipated to occur at the site. <br />Slope StabilitX <br />The site is a flat area; therefore, slope instability is not a concern for the proposed <br />development. <br />CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS <br />General Conclusions <br />Construction of the proposed structure at the subject site is considered geotechnically <br />feasible, provided the recommendations outlined in this report are implemented. <br />Note: The conclusions and recommendations of this report are based on information as <br />interpreted from our limited subsurface investigation. It is not anticipated but they should <br />be revised accordingly if geotechnical conditions to be exposed during site preparation/ <br />grading and construction significantly differ from our findings and interpretations. <br />In general, a conventional shallow foundation can be used for support of the proposed <br />structure. <br />The following recommendations are considered minimum and may be superseded by <br />more restrictive requirements of the architect, civil/structural engineer, building codes, or <br />governing agencies. <br />Geotechnical Impact on Neighboring Properties <br />Adverse geotechnical impact of the proposed development on the neighboring properties <br />is not anticipated, provided the recommendations outlined in this report are properly <br />implemented. <br />Page 4 <br />