My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CITY PROJECT - 1821 & 1823 E Chestnut Ave - Plan
PBA
>
Building
>
ProjectDox
>
C
>
Chestnut Ave
>
1821 E Chestnut Ave
>
CITY PROJECT - 1821 & 1823 E Chestnut Ave - Plan
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/24/2026 11:14:23 AM
Creation date
2/24/2026 11:13:50 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Plan
Permit Number
20184680
20184681
30148144
30148145
40139793
40139794
101121878
101121879
Full Address
1821 E Chestnut Ave
1823 E Chestnut Ave
Street Number
1823
Street Direction
E
Street Name
Chestnut
Street Suffix
Ave
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
333
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />ASSOCIATED SOILS ENGINEERING, INC. Project No.: 7160.23 <br />2860 Walnut Avenue, Signal Hill CA 90755 January 23, 2024 <br />Tel: (562) 426 -7990 * Fax: (562) 426 -1842 Page 20 <br />respectively, as shown in Figure 5, Nearby Building Surcharge Consideration and Retaining Wall <br />Drainage Details. <br /> <br />Any retaining wall with a retained height exceeding six (6) feet should additionally be designed to <br />resist seismic lateral earth pressure. The Geotechnical Consultant should be consulted if this <br />condition exists, or if the local governing agency requires the retaining wall to be designed for <br />seismic lateral earth pressure regardless of the retained height. Footings should be reinforced as <br />recommended to by Structural Consultant. Appropriate back drainage should be provided to avoid <br />excessive build-up of hydrostatic wall pressures. <br />Retaining Wall Design Parameter Value <br />Allowable Soils Bearing Capacity 2,000 psf (1)(2) <br />Active Pressure [site soils backfill: level] 40 pcf EFP (3) <br />At-rest Pressure [site soils backfill: level] 60 pcf EFP (3) <br />Passive Pressure (per foot of depth) 200 pcf EFP, subject to a ceiling value of 2,000 psf(4) <br />Coefficient of Friction 0.35 (4) <br />Minimum Footing Depth 18 inches <br />Minimum Footing Width 15 inches <br />Minimum Reinforcement Four No. 4 rebar - 2 near top and 2 near bottom <br />(1) Based on compliance with earthwork recommendations per Section 5.2 of this Soils Report. <br />(2) Allowable soils bearing capacity increase for larger retaining wall footings should be as per Section 5.3.2 b). <br />(3) Design values assuming a drained condition with “Very Low” to “Low” expansive materials (EI ≤ 35) within the <br />backfill zone and no surcharge loading conditions. <br />(4) Passive lateral resistance may be combined with frictional resistance provided the passive lateral earth pressure is <br />reduced by 1/3. See Section 5.3.1c. <br /> <br />The Geotechnical Consultant should be on-site during temporary back cut and retaining wall <br />construction to inspect and evaluate the stability of cuts and, if necessary, to provide additional <br />remedial or mitigative recommendations. <br /> <br />Preferably, the backfill should consist of approved “Very Low” expansive material (i.e. EI ≤ 20) and <br />should be compacted to a minimum relative compaction of 90 percent. The width of the “Very <br />Low” expansive backfill zone should be a minimum of one (1) foot measured from the rear side of <br />the stem of the retaining wall, or the space between the rear side of the stem and the heel of the <br />retaining wall, or one-half (1/2) of the retained height of the retaining wall, whichever is greater. <br />Flooding or jetting of backfill should not be permitted. Granular backfill should be capped with 18 <br />inches (minimum) of relatively impervious fill to seal the backfill and prevent saturation. Figure 5 <br />illustrates the general configuration and requirements for retaining wall drainage. Should any <br />conflict noticed between recommendations stated in this report and those shown in Figure 5, the <br />fore should govern. Other retaining wall drainage alternatives such as CONTECH C-Drain or
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.