Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Page | 5 <br /> <br />4) ANALYSIS RESULTS <br /> <br />Table 3 - Mount Component Stresses vs. Capacity <br />Notes Component Critical Member % Capacity Pass / Fail <br />1 <br />Mount Pipe MP2 20.4% Pass <br />Horizontal M35 95.6% Pass <br />Mast Pipe M101 71.4% Pass <br />Unistrut M103 84.9% Pass <br />Mount Connection(s) -- 50.2% Pass <br /> <br />Structure Rating (max from all components) = 95.6% <br />Notes: <br />1) See additional documentation in "Appendix A – Analyses and Calculations" for calculations supporting the % capacity <br />consumed. <br /> <br />4.1) Recommendations <br /> <br />The mount has sufficient capacity to carry the proposed loading configuration. In order for the results of the analysis to be <br />considered valid, the following must be completed. <br />1. All bolts and hardware should be checked for tightness and condition prior to installing the proposed equipment. <br />2. Pursuant to ATT-790-202-083 Macro Build Standards Section 5.2, contractor to space out antenna pipe mounts so that the <br />edge-to-edge antenna spacing is at a minimum spacing of 24”. <br />3. FRP Frame capacity was not analyzed since it is outside the scope of work for this project. <br />No structural modifications are required at this time, provided that the above-listed changes are implemented. <br /> <br /> <br />