HomeMy WebLinkAbout2704 W Camden Pl - Plan***The scope of the plans is for the installation of the solar photovoltaic system
only and the approval is subject to compliance with all applicable city and state
codes and regulations regarding construction. The approval of the plans does not
constitute any certification of the accuracy, completeness, or building permit
status of the existing buildings and structures as shown.
Bldg#: 101120682
Elec#: 20183879
Approvals:
Elec: M Smith
2704 W Camden Pl
9/26/2024
2704 W Camden Pl
9/26/2024
2704 W Camden Pl
9/26/2024
2704 W Camden Pl
9/26/2024
2704 W Camden Pl
9/26/2024
2704 W Camden Pl
9/26/2024
2704 W Camden Pl
9/26/2024
2704 W Camden Pl
9/26/2024
Minda Herman (Aug 23, 2024 11:59 PDT)
Minda Herman
08/23/2024
2704 W Camden Pl
9/26/2024
Expedited Permit Process for PV Systems - Micro-Inverter1
Expedited Permit Process for PV Systems
Micro-Inverter
The Solar America Board for Codes and Standards (Solar ABCs) Expedited Permit Pro-
cess provides a means to differentiate systems that can be permitted quickly and easily
due to their similarity with the majority of small-scale PV systems. Those systems with
unique characteristics may be handled with small additions to this Expedited Permit
Process or may require much more information, depending on the uniqueness of the
installation.
The following pages contain forms for the Micro-Inverter to use with the Expedited Per-
mit Process. The Standard String, AC Module, and Supply-Side Connection forms
are also available as interactive PDF files at www.solarabcs.org/permitting. In jurisdic-
tions that have adopted the Expedited Permit Process for PV Systems, these forms can
be filled out electronically and submitted in either printed form and via email. An elec-
tronic format is used so that the supplied information is standardized and legible for the
local jurisdiction.
2704 W Camden Pl
9/26/2024
Expedited Permit Process for PV Systems — Micro-Inverter 2
Expedited Permit Process for Small-Scale PV Systems
Micro-Inverter
The information in this guideline is intended to help local jurisdictions and contractors identify when PV system installations
are simple, needing only a basic review, and when an installation is more complex. It is likely that 50%-75% of all residential
systems will comply with these simple criteria. For projects that fail to meet the simple criteria, resolution steps have been
suggested to provide as a path to permit approval.
Required Information for Permit:
1. Site plan showing location of major components on the property. This drawing need not be exactly to scale, but it
should represent relative location of components at site (see supplied example site plan). PV arrays on dwellings
with a 3’ perimeter space at ridge and sides may not need separate fire service review.
2. Electrical diagram showing PV array configuration, wiring system, overcurrent protection, inverter, disconnects,
required signs, and ac connection to building (see supplied standard electrical diagram).
3. Specification sheets and installation manuals (if available) for all manufactured components including, but not
limited to, PV modules, inverter(s), combiner box, disconnects, and mounting system.
Step 1: Structural Review of PV Array Mounting System
Is the array to be mounted on a defined, permitted roof structure? l Yes l No
If No due to non-compliant roof or a ground mount, submit completed worksheet for the structure WKS1.
Roof Information:
1. Is the roofing type lightweight (Yes = composition, lightweight masonry, metal, etc…)__________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________
If No, submit completed worksheet for roof structure WKS1 (No = heavy masonry, slate, etc…).
2. Does the roof have a single roof covering? l Yes l No
If No, submit completed worksheet for roof structure WKS1.
3. Provide method and type of weatherproofing roof penetrations (e.g. flashing, caulk).____________________________
Mounting System Information:
1. Is the mounting structure an engineered product designed to mount PV modules with no more than an 18” gap
beneath the module frames? l Yes l No
If No, provide details of structural attachment certified by a design professional.
2. For manufactured mounting systems, fill out information on the mounting system below:
a. Mounting System Manufacturer ___________Product Name and Model#________________________________
b. Total Weight of PV Modules and Rails ___________lbs
c. Total Number of Attachment Points____________
d. Weight per Attachment Point (b÷c)_________________lbs (if greater than 45 lbs, see WKS1)
e. Maximum Spacing Between Attachment Points on a Rail ______________inches (see product manual for
maximum spacing allowed based on maximum design wind speed)
f. Total Surface Area of PV Modules (square feet)_________________ ft2
g. Distributed Weight of PV Module on Roof (b÷f)_______________ lbs/ft2
If distributed weight of the PV system is greater than 5 lbs/ft2, see WKS1.
Step 2: Electrical Review of PV System (Calculations for Electrical Diagram)
In order for a PV system to be considered for an expedited permit process, the following must apply:
1. PV modules, utility-interactive inverters, and combiner boxes are identified for use in PV systems.
2. The PV array is composed of 4 series strings or less per inverter.
3. The total inverter capacity has a continuous ac power output 13,440 Watts or less
4. The ac interconnection point is on the load side of service disconnecting means (690.64(B)).
5. One of the standard electrical diagrams (E1.1, E1.1a, E1.1b, or E1.1c) can be used to accurately represent the PV
system. Interactive PDF diagrams are available at www.solarabcs.org/permitting.
Fill out the standard electrical diagram completely. A guide to the electrical diagram is provided to help the applicant
understand each blank to fill in. If the electrical system is more complex than the standard electrical diagram can effectively
communicate, provide an alternative diagram with appropriate detail.
2704 W Camden Pl
9/26/2024
E
x
p
e
d
i
t
e
d
P
e
r
m
i
t
P
r
o
c
e
s
s
f
o
r
P
V
S
y
s
t
e
m
s
3
Micro-Inverter Site Plan
2704 W Camden Pl
9/26/2024
E
x
p
e
d
i
t
e
d
P
e
r
m
i
t
P
r
o
c
e
s
s
f
o
r
P
V
S
y
s
t
e
m
s
4
Micro-Inverter Electrical Diagram
Contractor Name,
Address and Phone:One-Line Standard Electrical Diagram
for Micro-Inverter PV Systems
Site Name:
Site Address:
System AC Size:
SIZE FSCM NO DWG NO REV
E1.1a
SCALE NTS Date: SHEET
Drawn By:
Checked By:
DESCRIPTION OR CONDUCTOR TYPE
USE-2 or PV WIRE
GEC EGC X ALL THAT APPLY
EXTERIOR CABLE LISTED W/ INV.
THWN-2 or XHHW-2 or RHW-2
GEC EGC X ALL THAT APPLY
NO DC GEC IF 690.35 SYSTEM
THWN-2 or XHHW-2 or RHW-2
GEC EGC X ALL THAT APPLY
TAG
1
2
3
4
5
CONDUIT AND CONDUCTOR SCHEDULE
COND.
GAUGE
MFG
MFG
NUMBER OF
CONDUCTORS
MFG Cable
MFG Cable
CONDUIT
TYPE
N/A
N/A
N/A
SAME
SAME
CONDUIT
SIZE
N/A
N/A
N/A
SAME
SAME
DESCRIPTION
PV DC or AC MODULE
DC/AC INVERTER (MICRO)
J-BOX (IF USED)
PV ARRAY
AC COMB. PANEL (IF USED)
GEN METER (IF USED)
AC DISCONNECT (IF USED)
SERVICE PANEL
TAG
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
PART NUMBER NOTES
FOR UNUSED MODULES
PUT "N/A” in BLANK ABOVE
1
1
3
2
3
EQUIPMENT SCHEDULE
2
_____
MICRO-INVERTERS
IN BRANCH-
CIRCUIT
MOD
____
DC
AC
MOD
____
DC
AC
MOD
____
DC
AC
MOD
____
DC
AC
MOD
____
DC
AC
MOD
____
DC
AC
J-BOX
4
AC DISCO
M
BUILDING
GROUNDING
ELECTRODE
G
M
UTILITY
SERVICE
MAIN SERVICE PANEL
MAIN
OCPD
INVERTER
OCPD
6
7
8
5
4 5
G
SEE GUIDE APPENDIX D FOR
INFORMATION ON MODULE AND
ARRAY GROUNDING
AC COMBINER
PANEL
G
____
MICRO-INVERTERS
IN BRANCH-
CIRCUIT
2704 W Camden Pl
9/26/2024
E
x
p
e
d
i
t
e
d
P
e
r
m
i
t
P
r
o
c
e
s
s
f
o
r
P
V
S
y
s
t
e
m
s
5
Contractor Name,
Address and Phone:Notes for One-Line Standard Electrical
Diagram for Single-Phase PV Systems
Site Name:
Site Address:
System AC Size:
SIZE FSCM NO DWG NO REV
E1.2a
SCALE NTS Date: SHEET
Drawn By:
Checked By:
MAX POWER-POINT CURRENT (IMP)
MAX POWER-POINT VOLTAGE (VMP)
OPEN-CIRCUIT VOLTAGE (VOC)
SHORT-CIRCUIT CURRENT (ISC)
MAX SERIES FUSE (OCPD)
MAXIMUM POWER (PMAX)
MAX VOLTAGE (TYP 600VDC)
VOC TEMP COEFF (mV/oC or %/oC )
IF COEFF SUPPLIED, CIRCLE UNITS
MODULE MAKE
MODULE MODEL
PV MODULE RATINGS @ STC (Guide Section 5)
MAX DC VOLT RATING
MAX POWER @ 40oC
NOMINAL AC VOLTAGE
MAX AC CURRENT
MAX OCPD RATING
INVERTER MAKE
INVERTER MODEL
INVERTER RATINGS (Guide Section 4)
1) IF UTILITY REQUIRES A VISIBLE-BREAK SWITCH, DOES THIS SWITCH MEET THE REQUIREMENT? YES NO N/A
2) IF GENERATION METER REQUIRED, DOES THIS METER SOCKET MEET THE REQUIREMENT? YES NO N/A
3) SIZE PHOTOVOLTAIC POWER SOURCE (DC) CONDUCTORS BASED ON MAX CURRENT ON NEC 690.53 SIGN OR OCPD RATING AT DISCONNECT
4) SIZE INVERTER OUTPUT CIRCUIT (AC) CONDUCTORS ACCORDING TO INVERTER OCPD AMPERE RATING. (See Guide Section 9)
5) TOTAL OF ______ INVERTER OUTPUT CIRCUIT OCPD(s), ONE FOR EACH MICRO-INVERTER CIRCUIT. DOES TOTAL SUPPLY BREAKERS COMPLY WITH 120% BUSBAR EXCEPTION IN 690.64(B)(2)(a)? YES NO
NOTES FOR INVERTER CIRCUITS (Guide Section 8 and 9):
1.) LOWEST EXPECT AMBIENT TEMPERATURE BASED ON ASHRAE MINIMUM MEAN EXTREME DRY BULB TEMPERATURE FOR ASHRAE LOCATION MOST SIMILAR TO INSTALLATION LOCATION. LOWEST EXPECTED AMBIENT TEMP ____oC
2.) HIGHEST CONTINUOUS AMBIENT TEMPERATURE BASED ON ASHRAE HIGHEST MONTH 2% DRY BULB TEMPERATURE FOR ASHRAE LOCATION MOST SIMILAR TO INSTALLATION LOCATION. HIGHEST CONTINUOUS TEMPERATURE ____oC
2.) 2009 ASHRAE FUNDAMENTALS 2% DESIGN TEMPERATURES DO NOT EXCEED 47oC IN THE UNITED STATES (PALM SPRINGS, CA IS 44.1oC). FOR LESS THAN 9 CURRENT-CARRYING CONDUCTORS IN ROOF-MOUNTED SUNLIT CONDUIT AT LEAST 0.5" ABOVE ROOF AND USING THE OUTDOOR DESIGN TEMPERATURE OF 47oC OR LESS (ALL OF UNITED STATES),
a) 12 AWG, 90oC CONDUCTORS ARE GENERALLY ACCEPTABLE FOR MODULES WITH Isc OF 7.68 AMPS OR LESS WHEN PROTECTED BY A 12-AMP OR SMALLER FUSE.b) 10 AWG, 90oC CONDUCTORS ARE GENERALLY ACCEPTABLE FOR MODULES WITH Isc OF 9.6 AMPS OR LESS WHEN PROTECTED BY A 15-AMP OR SMALLER FUSE.
NOTES FOR ARRAY CIRCUIT WIRING (Guide Section 6 and 8 and Appendix E):
OCPD = OVERCURRENT PROTECTION DEVICE
NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODE®REFERENCES
SHOWN AS (NEC XXX.XX)
NOTES FOR ALL DRAWINGS:
SIGNS–SEE GUIDE SECTION 7
SIGN FOR DC DISCONNECT
SIGN FOR INVERTER OCPD AND AC
DISCONNECT (IF USED)
No sign necessary since 690.51
marking on PV module covers
needed information
AC OUTPUT CURRENT
NOMINAL AC VOLTAGE
SOLAR PV SYSTEM
AC POINT OF CONNECTION
THIS PANEL FED BY MULTIPLE
SOURCES (UTILITY AND SOLAR)
Notes for Micro-Inverter Electrical Diagram 2704 W Camden Pl
9/26/2024
Empower Solar
1300 E. Shaw Ave #173
Fresno, CA, 93710800-306-6953
CSLB#1057693 - C10
To Whom It May Concern:
I, Scott Forster, am the license holder for Empower Solar, contractor license
C-10 #1057693 and certify to the accuracy of this authorization form.
I authorize the following Empower employee(s) to apply for, sign, file and
authorize cancellations of all documents necessary to obtain/cancel any
business license and/or permit for Empower Solar.
Brendan Blankenship
Name: Scott Forster
Signature:
Date: 02/1/2023
2704 W Camden Pl
9/26/2024
2704 W Camden Pl
9/26/2024
1724178104-Minda Herman -Santa Ana-HO
Auth Letter 1
Final Audit Report 2024-08-23
Created:2024-08-23
By:Empower Home (mandy@mpwrsolar.com)
Status:Signed
Transaction ID:CBJCHBCAABAA2N88CwzSWSwuBUmQeXK5osvekFBYKD72
"1724178104-Minda Herman -Santa Ana-HO Auth Letter 1" Hist
ory
Document created by Empower Home (mandy@mpwrsolar.com)
2024-08-23 - 6:01:54 PM GMT
Document emailed to aqua_obelisk@sbcglobal.net for signature
2024-08-23 - 6:01:59 PM GMT
Email viewed by aqua_obelisk@sbcglobal.net
2024-08-23 - 6:58:42 PM GMT
Signer aqua_obelisk@sbcglobal.net entered name at signing as Minda Herman
2024-08-23 - 6:59:34 PM GMT
Document e-signed by Minda Herman (aqua_obelisk@sbcglobal.net)
Signature Date: 2024-08-23 - 6:59:36 PM GMT - Time Source: server
Agreement completed.
2024-08-23 - 6:59:36 PM GMT
2704 W Camden Pl
9/26/2024
Project :
Project Number:
By :
Date :
UNIRAC
1411 Broadway Blvd, NE
Albuquerque, NM 87102
RE: Solar Array Installation at 2704 W Camden Pl, Santa Ana, CA 92704, USA
To Whom it May Concern,
CODE REFERENCES:
BUILDING CODE: 2022 CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODE
2021 INTERNATIONAL BUILDING CODE
ASCE 7-16
SCOPE OF WORK:
DESIGN PARAMETERS
RISK CATEGORY :
DESIGN WIND SPEED : mph
WIND EXPOSURE :
GROUND SNOW LOAD : psf
SEISMIC DESIGN CATEGORY :
EXISTING ROOF STRUCTURE
ROOF : 2x6 Rafters @ 24" O.C.
ROOF MATERIAL : W Tile
CONNECTION TO ROOF STRUCTURE
MOUNTING CONNECTION :
Minda Herman
PE
08-08-2024
Roof structural framing plan has been reviewed for additional loading due to installation of the roof mounted
solar PV addition. The structural review that follows, including plans and calculations, only apply to the section of
the roof that is directly supporting the solar PV system and its supporting elements.
08 August 2024
Per your request, we have reviewed the existing structure at the above referenced site. The purpose of our review
was to determine the adequacy of the existing structure to support the proposed installation of solar panels on the
roof per layout plan.
(2) 1/4" SS LAG SCREWS w/ MIN. 2.5" EMBEDMENT INTO (E) 2x FRAMING
MEMBER @ MAX. 48" O.C. ALONG RAILS
(2) RAILS PER ROW OF PANELS, EVENLY SPACED. PANEL LENGTH
PERPENDICULAR TO RAIL NOT TO EXCEED 74"
II
95
B
0
*null
Page 1
2704 W Camden Pl
9/26/2024
OBSERVED CONDITIONS:
CONCLUSIONS:
LIMITATIONS:
Praneet R Erusu, P.E.
Principal Engineer
Erusu Consultants US Inc.
The observed roof framing is described below. If field conditions differ, the contractor shall notify the engineer
prior to starting construction. The roof framing is supported by 2x6 Rafters @ 24" O.C are spanning between
load bearing walls. The maximum allowed clear span of rafter is 14ft, to be verified in field by the contractor.
Based upon our review, we conclude that the existing structure is adequate to support the proposed solar panel
installation. In the area of the solar array, other live loads will not be present or will be greatly reduced (2022
CBC, Section 1607.14.4). The gravity loads and the stresses of the structural elements, in the area of the solar
array are either decreased or increased by no more than 5%. Therefore, the requirements of Section 503.3 of the
2022 CEBC are met and the structure is permitted to remain unaltered.
The solar array will be flush-mounted (no more than 10" above the roof surface) and parallel to the roof surface.
Thus, we conclude that any additional wind loading on the structure related to the addition of the proposed solar
array is negligible. The attached calculations verify the capacity of the connections of the solar array to the
existing roof against wind (uplift), the governing load case. Regarding seismic loads, we conclude that any
additional forces will be small. Conservatively neglecting the weight of existing wall materials, the installation of
the solar panels represents an increase in the total weight (and resulting seismic load) of 1.2%. Because the
increase in lateral forces is less than 10%, this addition meets the requirements of the exception in Section 503.4
of the 2022 CEBC. Thus the existing lateral force resisting system is permitted to remain unaltered.
Installation of the solar panels must be performed in accordance with manufacturer recommendations. All work
performed must be in accordance with accepted industry-wide methods and applicable safety standards. Existing
Roof and structural members are assumed to be in good and serviceable condition. The contractor must notify
Erusu Consultants US Inc. should any damage, deterioration or discrepancies between the as-built condition of
the structure and the condition described in this letter be found. The use of solar panel support span tables
provided by others are allowed only where the building type, site conditions, site-specific design parameters, and
solar panel configuration match the description of the span tables. The design of the solar panel racking (mounts,
rails,etc.), and electrical engineering is the responsibility of others. Waterproofing around the roof penetrations is
the responsibility of others. Erusu Consultants US Inc. assumes no responsibility for improper installation of the
solar array.
08 Aug 2024
EXP : 30 Sep 2025
Page 2
2704 W Camden Pl
9/26/2024
Project :
Project Number:
By :
Date :
Address :
Site Plan:
Minda Herman
PE
08-08-2024
2704 W Camden Pl, Santa Ana, CA 92704, USA
Page 3
2704 W Camden Pl
9/26/2024
Project :
Project Number:
By :
Date :
Roof Dead Load
Roof Slope = :
Angle = degrees
Roof Live Load
Roof Live Load = psf (Refer ASCE 7-16, Table 4.3-1)
Roof Live Load with PV Array = psf 2022 CBC, Section 1607.14.4
(Ceiling load and MEP is assumed to be not supported by rafter)
3.16
1/2" Gypsum Ceiling
Minda Herman
PE
08-08-2024
DL =
Increase due to
Roof Slope
Plan Projected Material
Weight (psf)
12.65
1.16
3.16
0.53Insulation 0.5 1.05
2.32
1.50
21.32
1/2" Plywood 1.1 1.05
Framing 3 1.05
W Tile 12 1.05
4 12
18
Material
Material Weight
(psf)
PV Array 3 1.05
2.2 1.05
MEP & Misc. 1.5
20
0
Page 4
2704 W Camden Pl
9/26/2024
Project :
Project Number:
By :
Date :
Minda Herman
PE
08-08-2024
Summary of Gravity Loads
Dead Load, D = psf
Roof Live Load, Lr = psf
Gravity Load Comparison
(D + Lr)/Cd = psf
(Cd = 0.9 for D, 1.15 for S, 1.25 for Lr)
Max Loading = psf
Proposed to Current Loading Ratio =
Existing With PV Array
21.32 24.48
39.69 27.20
20.00 0.00
Existing With PV Array
O.K.
Gravity Loading with PV Array is not stressing the current framing system by more that 5% of the original
configuration. Per Section 503.3 of 2022 California Existing Building Code the structure is allowed to remain
unaltered for gravity loading
39.69 27.20
69%< 105%
Page 5
2704 W Camden Pl
9/26/2024
Project :
Project Number:
By :
Date :
Wind Load Calculation
Wind Loads - ASCE 7-16 Chapter 26 & 29
Width of the Building, B = ft (Approximate)
V = mph
Exposure =
Average height of building, z = ft - avg (Approximate)
ft (Refer ASCE 7-16, Table 26.11-1)
α =Zg =ft (Refer ASCE 7-16, Table 26.11-1)
Kh & Kz =2.01(z/Zg)^(2/α) =
Kzt =(Refer ASCE 7-16, Equation 26.8-1)
Kd =(Refer ASCE 7-16, Table 26.6.1)
Ke =(Refer ASCE 7-16, Table 26.9-1)
qh ='.00256 KzKztKdKeV² =psf (Refer ASCE 7-16, Section 26.10-1)
Building Classification =
Solar Panel
Components and Cladding p C&C = qh(GCp)(ϒe)(ϒa)ASCE 7-16 Chapter 29.4.4
Module Length =in
Module Width =in
Area of Module =ft2
Roof Pitch =:
Slope =degrees
Gable Roof =
ϒe=
ϒa= (Refer ASCE 7-16, Figure 29.4-8)
Minda Herman
PE
08-08-2024
1200
zmin = 30
7
1
47.2
1
0.85
11.29
4.0
41.1
95
B
15
0.57
Enclosed
0.8
21.1
74
7° < θ ≤ 20°
1.5
12
18
Page 6
2704 W Camden Pl
9/26/2024
Project :
Project Number:
By :
Date :
Minda Herman
PE
08-08-2024
Zone 1 Uplift
External Wind pressure coefficient GCp =
External Wind pressure, qGCp = psf
Zone 2 Uplift
External Wind pressure coefficient GCp =
External Wind pressure, qGCp = psf
All Zone Downward
External Wind pressure coefficient GCp =
External Wind pressure, qGCp = psf
Maximum Uplift Wind Pressure, p = psf
Minimum Downward Wind Pressure, p =psf
Wind Load
Tributary Width =in (Max Spacing of fastners along Rails)
Tributary Length =in (Half Panel Length)
Tributary Area =ft2
Max Wind Downward (Wd) =lbs
Max Wind Uplift (Wu) =lbs
Dead Load
Loads from Solar panel (Dead)
PV Array Load =psf
Tributary Area =ft2
Axial Load (Pd) =lbs
Eccentricity (e) =in
Distance between anchors (w) = in
Moment due to eccentricity (Pd*e) =lbs-in
Tensile load, D1 = (Pd/2 + Pd*e/w) = lbs
Compressive load, D2 = (Pd*e/w - Pd/2) = lbs223.0
3.0
-260.0
6.20
0.95
229.4
-2.6
48
37
12.33
37.00
-35.21
-2
-27.088
-35.21
16.0
0.5
6.8
12.33
197.33
-434.3
Page 7
2704 W Camden Pl
9/26/2024
Project :
Project Number:
By :
Date :
Minda Herman
PE
08-08-2024
Load Combinations
[D1+0.6Wu] = lbs
[D1+0.6Wd] = lbs
[D2+0.6Wu] = lbs
[D2+0.6Wd] = lbs
[0.6D1+0.6Wu] = lbs
[0.6D1+0.6Wd] = lbs
[0.6D2+0.6Wu] = lbs
[0.6D2+0.6Wd] = lbs
Max pull out load on screw = lbs (Demand)
Lag Screw / Bolt Connection Check (ASD)
Lag Screw/Bolt Size =
Cd =(Refer NDS Table 2.3.2)
Embedment = in
Grade of Wood = #2 (or better)
G =
Capacity = lb/in (Refer NDS Table 12.2A)
Number of Screws in Tension =
Prying Coefficient =
Capacity of Fasteners = lb (Capacity)
Demand (lb) Capacity (lb) DCR
520.6 1286 0.40
0.5
225
2
1.4
1286
1/4
1.6
2.5 (Measured from top of the framing member to tapered tip of lag
screw, embeddment in sheathing and tapered tip of screw is not
included )
DF
-416.6
-37.6
-126.8
252.2
520.6
-520.6
-141.6
-37.6
341.4
Page 8
2704 W Camden Pl
9/26/2024
Wood Beam
LIC# : KW-06014559, Build:20.24.06.04 ERUSU CONSULTANTS US (c) ENERCALC INC 1983-2023
DESCRIPTION:2x6 Rafters @ 24" o.c. (Wind Condition_Downward) (Strength Check)
Project File: 2x6 joist @ 24 o.c_copy.ec6
Project Title:
Engineer:
Project ID:
Project Descr:
CODE REFERENCES
Calculations per NDS 2018, IBC 2021, ASCE 7-16
Load Combination Set : ASCE 7-16
Material Properties
Beam Bracing :Beam is Fully Braced against lateral-torsional buckling Repetitive Member Stress Increase
Allowable Stress Design
Douglas Fir-Larch
No.2
900.0
900.0
1,350.0
625.0
1,600.0
580.0
180.0
575.0 31.210
Analysis Method :
Eminbend - xx ksi
Wood Species :
Wood Grade :
Fb +
psi
psi
Fv psi
Fb -
Ft psi
Fc - Prll psi
psiFc - Perp
E : Modulus of Elasticity
Ebend- xx ksi
Density pcf
Load Combination :ASCE 7-16
.Applied Loads Service loads entered. Load Factors will be applied for calculations.
Beam self weight NOT internally calculated and added
Load for Span Number 1
Uniform Load : D = 0.010, Lr = 0.020, W = 0.0160 ksf, Tributary Width = 2.0 ft, (Existing Roof Load)
Load for Span Number 2
Uniform Load : D = 0.010 ksf, Tributary Width = 2.0 ft, (Existing Roof Dead Load)
Point Load : D = 0.0370, W = 0.1970 k @ 1.750 ft, (Solar Panel Load)
Point Load : D = 0.0370, W = 0.1970 k @ 5.70 ft, (Solar Panel Load)
Uniform Load : Lr = 0.020, W = 0.0160 ksf, Extent = 0.0 -->> 0.750 ft, Tributary Width = 2.0 ft, (Existing Wind & Roof Live Load)
Uniform Load : Lr = 0.020, W = 0.0160 ksf, Extent = 12.60 -->> 14.0 ft, Tributary Width = 2.0 ft, (Existing Wind & Roof Live Load)
.DESIGN SUMMARY Design OK
Maximum Bending Stress Ratio 0.827: 1
Load Combination +D+0.60W
Span # where maximum occurs Span # 2
Location of maximum on span 5.709 ft
67.90 psi=
=
2,152.80 psi
2x6Section used for this span
Span # where maximum occurs
Location of maximum on span
Span # 1=
Load Combination +D+0.60W
=
=
=
288.00 psi==
Section used for this span 2x6
Maximum Shear Stress Ratio 0.236 : 1
2.000 ft=
=
1,781.14 psi
Maximum Deflection
128
>=128
152
Ratio =92 >=91
Max Downward Transient Deflection 0.768 in
218
Ratio =>=128
Max Upward Transient Deflection -0.371 in Ratio =
Max Downward Total Deflection 1.104 in Ratio =>=91
Max Upward Total Deflection -0.513 in
fb: Actual
F'b
fv: Actual
F'v
Span: 2 : W Only
Span: 1 : W Only
Span: 2 : +D+0.60W
Span: 1 : +D+0.60W
.Maximum Forces & Stresses for Load Combinations
Span #
Moment ValuesLoad Combination
C iCLx CCCMCF rt
Shear ValuesMax Stress Ratios
M CDV fbM fvF'b V F'vSegment Length Cfu
D Only 0.0 0.00 0.00.0
1.00Length = 2.0 ft 1 0.052 0.213 0.90 1.300 1.151.00 1.00 0.04 63.5 1,211.0 0.19 162.01.00 34.41.00
1.00Length = 14.0 ft 2 0.806 0.213 0.90 1.300 1.151.00 1.00 0.61 975.7 1,211.0 0.19 162.01.00 34.41.00
1.00+D+Lr 1.300 1.151.00 1.00 0.0 0.00 0.01.00 0.01.00
Page 9
2704 W Camden Pl
9/26/2024
Wood Beam
LIC# : KW-06014559, Build:20.24.06.04 ERUSU CONSULTANTS US (c) ENERCALC INC 1983-2023
DESCRIPTION:2x6 Rafters @ 24" o.c. (Wind Condition_Downward) (Strength Check)
Project File: 2x6 joist @ 24 o.c_copy.ec6
Project Title:
Engineer:
Project ID:
Project Descr:
Maximum Forces & Stresses for Load Combinations
Span #
Moment ValuesLoad Combination
C iCLx CCCMCF rt
Shear ValuesMax Stress Ratios
M CDV fbM fvF'b V F'vSegment Length Cfu
1.00Length = 2.0 ft 1 0.113 0.171 1.25 1.300 1.151.00 1.00 0.12 190.4 1,681.9 0.21 225.01.00 38.41.00
1.00Length = 14.0 ft 2 0.561 0.171 1.25 1.300 1.151.00 1.00 0.60 944.3 1,681.9 0.21 225.01.00 38.41.00
1.00+D+0.750Lr 1.300 1.151.00 1.00 0.0 0.00 0.01.00 0.01.00
1.00Length = 2.0 ft 1 0.094 0.166 1.25 1.300 1.151.00 1.00 0.10 158.7 1,681.9 0.21 225.01.00 37.41.00
1.00Length = 14.0 ft 2 0.566 0.166 1.25 1.300 1.151.00 1.00 0.60 951.7 1,681.9 0.21 225.01.00 37.41.00
1.00+D+0.60W 1.300 1.151.00 1.00 0.0 0.00 0.01.00 0.01.00
1.00Length = 2.0 ft 1 0.058 0.236 1.60 1.300 1.151.00 1.00 0.08 124.4 2,152.8 0.37 288.01.00 67.91.00
1.00Length = 14.0 ft 2 0.827 0.236 1.60 1.300 1.151.00 1.00 1.12 1,781.1 2,152.8 0.37 288.01.00 67.91.00
1.00+D+0.750Lr+0.450W 1.300 1.151.00 1.00 0.0 0.00 0.01.00 0.01.00
1.00Length = 2.0 ft 1 0.095 0.217 1.60 1.300 1.151.00 1.00 0.13 204.4 2,152.8 0.34 288.01.00 62.51.00
1.00Length = 14.0 ft 2 0.720 0.217 1.60 1.300 1.151.00 1.00 0.98 1,549.6 2,152.8 0.34 288.01.00 62.51.00
1.00+D+0.450W 1.300 1.151.00 1.00 0.0 0.00 0.01.00 0.01.00
1.00Length = 2.0 ft 1 0.051 0.207 1.60 1.300 1.151.00 1.00 0.07 109.2 2,152.8 0.33 288.01.00 59.51.00
1.00Length = 14.0 ft 2 0.733 0.207 1.60 1.300 1.151.00 1.00 1.00 1,579.0 2,152.8 0.33 288.01.00 59.51.00
1.00+0.60D+0.60W 1.300 1.151.00 1.00 0.0 0.00 0.01.00 0.01.00
1.00Length = 2.0 ft 1 0.046 0.188 1.60 1.300 1.151.00 1.00 0.06 99.0 2,152.8 0.30 288.01.00 54.11.00
1.00Length = 14.0 ft 2 0.647 0.188 1.60 1.300 1.151.00 1.00 0.88 1,392.1 2,152.8 0.30 288.01.00 54.11.00
1.00+0.60D 1.300 1.151.00 1.00 0.0 0.00 0.01.00 0.01.00
1.00Length = 2.0 ft 1 0.018 0.072 1.60 1.300 1.151.00 1.00 0.02 38.1 2,152.8 0.11 288.01.00 20.71.00
1.00Length = 14.0 ft 2 0.272 0.072 1.60 1.300 1.151.00 1.00 0.37 585.4 2,152.8 0.11 288.01.00 20.71.00
.
Location in SpanLoad CombinationMax. "-" Defl Location in SpanLoad Combination Span Max. "+" Defl
Overall Maximum Deflections
+D+0.60W10.0000 0.000 -0.5129 0.000
+D+0.60W 2 1.1045 6.804 0.0000 0.000
.
Load Combination Support 1 Support 2 Support 3
Vertical Reactions Support notation : Far left is #1 Values in KIPS
Max Upward from all Load Conditions 0.498 0.258
Max Upward from Load Combinations 0.498 0.258
Max Upward from Load Cases 0.383 0.157
D Only 0.237 0.157
+D+Lr 0.355 0.205
+D+0.750Lr 0.325 0.193
+D+0.60W 0.467 0.243
+D+0.750Lr+0.450W 0.498 0.258
+D+0.450W 0.410 0.221
+0.60D+0.60W 0.372 0.180
+0.60D 0.142 0.094
Lr Only 0.118 0.048
W Only 0.383 0.143
Page 10
2704 W Camden Pl
9/26/2024
Wood Beam
LIC# : KW-06014559, Build:20.24.06.04 ERUSU CONSULTANTS US (c) ENERCALC INC 1983-2023
DESCRIPTION:2x6 Rafters @ 24" o.c. (Wind Condition_Uplift) (Strength Check)
Project File: 2x6 joist @ 24 o.c_copy.ec6
Project Title:
Engineer:
Project ID:
Project Descr:
CODE REFERENCES
Calculations per NDS 2018, IBC 2021, ASCE 7-16
Load Combination Set : ASCE 7-16
Material Properties
Beam Bracing :Beam is Fully Braced against lateral-torsional buckling Repetitive Member Stress Increase
Allowable Stress Design
Douglas Fir-Larch
No.2
900.0
900.0
1,350.0
625.0
1,600.0
580.0
180.0
575.0 31.210
Analysis Method :
Eminbend - xx ksi
Wood Species :
Wood Grade :
Fb +
psi
psi
Fv psi
Fb -
Ft psi
Fc - Prll psi
psiFc - Perp
E : Modulus of Elasticity
Ebend- xx ksi
Density pcf
Load Combination :ASCE 7-16
.Applied Loads Service loads entered. Load Factors will be applied for calculations.
Beam self weight NOT internally calculated and added
Load for Span Number 1
Uniform Load : D = 0.010, Lr = 0.020, W = -0.0350 ksf, Tributary Width = 2.0 ft, (Existing Roof Load)
Load for Span Number 2
Uniform Load : D = 0.010 ksf, Tributary Width = 2.0 ft, (Existing Roof Dead Load)
Point Load : D = 0.0370, W = -0.4340 k @ 1.750 ft, (Solar Panel Load)
Point Load : D = 0.0370, W = -0.4340 k @ 5.70 ft, (Solar Panel Load)
Uniform Load : Lr = 0.020, W = -0.0350 ksf, Extent = 0.0 -->> 0.750 ft, Tributary Width = 2.0 ft, (Existing Wind & Roof Live Load)
Uniform Load : Lr = 0.020, W = -0.0350 ksf, Extent = 12.60 -->> 14.0 ft, Tributary Width = 2.0 ft, (Existing Wind & Roof Live Load)
.DESIGN SUMMARY Design OK
Maximum Bending Stress Ratio 0.806: 1
Load Combination D Only
Span # where maximum occurs Span # 2
Location of maximum on span 6.179 ft
34.43 psi=
=
1,210.95 psi
2x6Section used for this span
Span # where maximum occurs
Location of maximum on span
Span # 1=
Load Combination D Only
=
=
=
162.00 psi==
Section used for this span 2x6
Maximum Shear Stress Ratio 0.213 : 1
2.000 ft=
=
975.72 psi
Maximum Deflection
99
>=58
150
Ratio =164 >=120
Max Downward Transient Deflection 0.819 in
58
Ratio =>=58
Max Upward Transient Deflection -1.692 in Ratio =
Max Downward Total Deflection 0.317 in Ratio =>=120
Max Upward Total Deflection -0.290 in
fb: Actual
F'b
fv: Actual
F'v
Span: 1 : W Only
Span: 2 : W Only
Span: 1 : +0.60D+0.60W
Span: 1 : D Only
.Maximum Forces & Stresses for Load Combinations
Span #
Moment ValuesLoad Combination
C iCLx CCCMCF rt
Shear ValuesMax Stress Ratios
M CDV fbM fvF'b V F'vSegment Length Cfu
D Only 0.0 0.00 0.00.0
1.00Length = 2.0 ft 1 0.052 0.213 0.90 1.300 1.151.00 1.00 0.04 63.5 1,211.0 0.19 162.01.00 34.41.00
1.00Length = 14.0 ft 2 0.806 0.213 0.90 1.300 1.151.00 1.00 0.61 975.7 1,211.0 0.19 162.01.00 34.41.00
1.00+D+Lr 1.300 1.151.00 1.00 0.0 0.00 0.01.00 0.01.00
Page 11
2704 W Camden Pl
9/26/2024
Wood Beam
LIC# : KW-06014559, Build:20.24.06.04 ERUSU CONSULTANTS US (c) ENERCALC INC 1983-2023
DESCRIPTION:2x6 Rafters @ 24" o.c. (Wind Condition_Uplift) (Strength Check)
Project File: 2x6 joist @ 24 o.c_copy.ec6
Project Title:
Engineer:
Project ID:
Project Descr:
Maximum Forces & Stresses for Load Combinations
Span #
Moment ValuesLoad Combination
C iCLx CCCMCF rt
Shear ValuesMax Stress Ratios
M CDV fbM fvF'b V F'vSegment Length Cfu
1.00Length = 2.0 ft 1 0.113 0.171 1.25 1.300 1.151.00 1.00 0.12 190.4 1,681.9 0.21 225.01.00 38.41.00
1.00Length = 14.0 ft 2 0.561 0.171 1.25 1.300 1.151.00 1.00 0.60 944.3 1,681.9 0.21 225.01.00 38.41.00
1.00+D+0.750Lr 1.300 1.151.00 1.00 0.0 0.00 0.01.00 0.01.00
1.00Length = 2.0 ft 1 0.094 0.166 1.25 1.300 1.151.00 1.00 0.10 158.7 1,681.9 0.21 225.01.00 37.41.00
1.00Length = 14.0 ft 2 0.566 0.166 1.25 1.300 1.151.00 1.00 0.60 951.7 1,681.9 0.21 225.01.00 37.41.00
1.00+D+0.60W 1.300 1.151.00 1.00 0.0 0.00 0.01.00 0.01.00
1.00Length = 2.0 ft 1 0.032 0.136 1.60 1.300 1.151.00 1.00 0.04 69.8 2,152.8 0.22 288.01.00 39.31.00
1.00Length = 14.0 ft 2 0.376 0.144 1.60 1.300 1.151.00 1.00 0.51 809.2 2,152.8 0.23 288.01.00 41.41.00
1.00+D+0.750Lr+0.450W 1.300 1.151.00 1.00 0.0 0.00 0.01.00 0.01.00
1.00Length = 2.0 ft 1 0.027 0.057 1.60 1.300 1.151.00 1.00 0.04 58.7 2,152.8 0.09 288.01.00 16.51.00
1.00Length = 14.0 ft 2 0.183 0.078 1.60 1.300 1.151.00 1.00 0.25 393.2 2,152.8 0.12 288.01.00 22.61.00
1.00+D+0.450W 1.300 1.151.00 1.00 0.0 0.00 0.01.00 0.01.00
1.00Length = 2.0 ft 1 0.017 0.072 1.60 1.300 1.151.00 1.00 0.02 36.5 2,152.8 0.11 288.01.00 20.91.00
1.00Length = 14.0 ft 2 0.169 0.082 1.60 1.300 1.151.00 1.00 0.23 363.8 2,152.8 0.13 288.01.00 23.61.00
1.00+0.60D+0.60W 1.300 1.151.00 1.00 0.0 0.00 0.01.00 0.01.00
1.00Length = 2.0 ft 1 0.044 0.184 1.60 1.300 1.151.00 1.00 0.06 95.2 2,152.8 0.29 288.01.00 53.11.00
1.00Length = 14.0 ft 2 0.557 0.185 1.60 1.300 1.151.00 1.00 0.76 1,198.2 2,152.8 0.29 288.01.00 53.21.00
1.00+0.60D 1.300 1.151.00 1.00 0.0 0.00 0.01.00 0.01.00
1.00Length = 2.0 ft 1 0.018 0.072 1.60 1.300 1.151.00 1.00 0.02 38.1 2,152.8 0.11 288.01.00 20.71.00
1.00Length = 14.0 ft 2 0.272 0.072 1.60 1.300 1.151.00 1.00 0.37 585.4 2,152.8 0.11 288.01.00 20.71.00
.
Location in SpanLoad CombinationMax. "-" Defl Location in SpanLoad Combination Span Max. "+" Defl
Overall Maximum Deflections
W Only 1 0.8185 0.000 0.0000 0.000
W Only20.0000 0.000 -1.6920 6.570
.
Load Combination Support 1 Support 2 Support 3
Vertical Reactions Support notation : Far left is #1 Values in KIPS
Max Upward from all Load Conditions 0.355 0.205
Max Upward from Load Combinations 0.355 0.205
Max Upward from Load Cases 0.237 0.157
Max Downward from all Load Conditio -0.843 -0.315
Max Downward from Load Combinations -0.364 -0.095
Max Downward from Load Cases (Resis -0.843 -0.315
D Only 0.237 0.157
+D+Lr 0.355 0.205
+D+0.750Lr 0.325 0.193
+D+0.60W -0.269 -0.032
+D+0.750Lr+0.450W -0.054 0.051
+D+0.450W -0.142 0.015
+0.60D+0.60W -0.364 -0.095
+0.60D 0.142 0.094
Lr Only 0.118 0.048
W Only -0.843 -0.315
Page 12
2704 W Camden Pl
9/26/2024
Project :
Project Number:
By :
Date :
Seismic Ground Motion Values
Minda Herman
PE
08-08-2024
Page 13
2704 W Camden Pl
9/26/2024
Project :
Project Number:
By :
Date :
Seismic Design Force
Seismic Loads - ASCE 7-16 Chapter 13
Seismic Force
Component Amplification Factor, ap= (Refer ASCE 7-16, Table 13.6 -1)
Overstrength Factor, Ωo = (Refer ASCE 7-16, Table 13.6 -1)
Component Importance Factor, Ip=
SDS =
Average roof height of structure,h =ft
z/h =z/h should not exceed 1
Frame Weight Wp = psf
Seismic Design Force on Solar framing structure
Horizontal Seismic Design Load, Fp
Max Fp =1.6 x SDS x Ip X Wp =psf
Min Fp =0.3 x SDS x Ip X Wp =psf
Horizontal Seismic Design Load Fp =psf
Vertical Seismic Design Load Fv =psf
Seismic Coefficients for Mechanical
and Electrical components =
Component Response Modification
Factor, Rp=
1.50
Minda Herman
PE
08-08-2024
12 Other mechanical or electrical components.
(Refer ASCE 7-16, Table 13.6 -1)
Height in structure at point of attachment,
z =
15 ft
1.00
2.00
1.04
1.00
FP = ((0.4 x ap x SDS x Wp)/ (Rp / Ip)) x
((1+2(z/h)) =2.63 psf
15
1
2.63
5.27
0.99
3.16
0.66
Page 14
2704 W Camden Pl
9/26/2024
Project :
Project Number:
By :
Date :
Minda Herman
PE
08-08-2024
Check for Increase in overall seismic loads
Module Area =ft2
Number of Modules =
Total Array Area =ft2
Array Load = psf
Number of Existing Modules =
Existing Array Area =ft2
Total Array Wt. = lb
Total Roof Area =ft2
DL of Roof = psf
Total Wt. of Roof = lb
Increase in Seismic Wt. = < 10%
Conservatively the Wt. of the Walls tributary to the roof is not included. Seismic weight increase is less than
10% and no seismic retrofit or evaluation of existing lateral system is required per Section 503.4 of 2022
CEBC.
21.1
10
211.21
2379
3.00
633.63
0
0.00
21.32
50713
1.2%
Page 15
2704 W Camden Pl
9/26/2024
Rev: 7/15/2021
RESIDENTIAL
PHOTOVOLTAIC
SOL-01 CBC 2019
Solar Photovoltaic (PV) Checklist for Detached SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCES Only
Instructions: The licensed contractor of record shall complete all sections, answer the ten questions and
sign the certification section below. A copy of this form shall be attached to each of TWO sets of plans, of
minimum 11” x 17” size. If answering NO to any of the questions, plan check shall be required.
Project Address:
Contractor Company Name:
Contractor License Number:
YES NO Are the following applicable to the proposed project?
1. Will the PV system layout provide the required three-foot wide clear access pathways
per Section 605.11 of the California Fire Code, and is this shown on the roof plan?
2. Will the PV system be installed on a roof having only one roofing layer with no
overlays?
3. Will the PV array be flush mounted to the existing roof so that the plane of the
modules (panels) are parallel to the plane of the roof?
4. Will the PV system weigh maximum 4 pounds per square feet or less?
5. Will the PV system be installed where the modules do not overhang any roof edges
(such as eaves, gabled ends, ridges and hips)?
6. Will the PV system be installed with a space of 2” minimum to 10” maximum between
the underside of modules and the surface of the roof?
7. Will the PV system be installed without using any ballast system or counter-weight
system?
8. Will the anchors be installed with a maximum horizontal anchor spacing of 6 feet
and is this maximum horizontal spacing shown on the plans?
9. Will the minimum 5/16” lag screws be installed with a minimum of 2-1/2 inch
embedment into roof rafters (with pre-drilled holes) and is this minimum embedment
shown on the plans?
10. Are ALL the structural pages of the plans stamped and signed by a California
licensed professional engineer? (including project specific site plan, PV layout,
anchorage spacing, anchorage details and manufacturer’s PV support information.)
I certify under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the above is true:
Print Name: Signature:
Phone Number: Date:
Email Address:
Planning & Building Agency
Building Safety Division
20 Civic Center Plaza
P.O. Box 1988 (M-19)
Santa Ana, CA 92702
(714) 647-5800
www.santa-ana.org
2704 W Camden Pl
9/26/2024
2704 W Camden Pl
9/26/2024
2704 W Camden Pl
9/26/2024
2704 W Camden Pl
9/26/2024
2704 W Camden Pl
9/26/2024
2704 W Camden Pl
9/26/2024
2704 W Camden Pl
9/26/2024
2704 W Camden Pl
9/26/2024
2704 W Camden Pl
9/26/2024
2704 W Camden Pl
9/26/2024
2704 W Camden Pl
9/26/2024
2704 W Camden Pl
9/26/2024
2704 W Camden Pl
9/26/2024
2704 W Camden Pl
9/26/2024
2704 W Camden Pl
9/26/2024
2704 W Camden Pl
9/26/2024
2704 W Camden Pl
9/26/2024