Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout267541_2_Corrections.docxTENANT IMPROVEMENT PLAN CHECK COMMENTS COMMENTS Planning & Building Agency Building Safety Division 20 Civic Center Plaza P.O. Box 1988 (M-19) Santa Ana, CA 92702 (714) 647-5800 www.santa-ana.org PLAN CHECK NO: 101104334 PROJECT ADDRESS: 515 E Dyer Rd PLAN CHECK ENGINEER: Le, TungTEL:714 647-5896 EMAIL: Tle10@santa-ana.orgFAX:714 647-5897 TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: III B, SPK OCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATION(S): B, S-1, S-2 PLAN CHECK DATES: REMARKS/RECHECK ITEMS: APPLICATION 8/20/2020 INITIAL REVIEW 9/2/2020 EXPIRATION 2/16/2021 RECHECKS: 1.10/08/2020 PROJECT APPLICANT CONTACT PERSON: 2. Doug Hinrichs 3. TEL: (949)862-2135 FAX: VALUATION: $2,000,000.00 EMAIL: doug.hinrichs@hparchs.com FLOOD ZONE: X-0602320278J APPLICABLE CODE: 2019 CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODE (CBC) WITH CITY OF SANTA ANA AMENDMENTS General comments and approval requirement All items noted on this plan check report must be addressed. If you feel that an item is not applicable to your project, note “N/A” and discuss the reason with the plan checker.Please indicate the sheet number and detail to the right of each correction, or note the number on the plans where the correction is made. Resubmit marked original, calculations and this correction sheet. A separate sheet for response may be used.Resubmit 3corrected sets of plans.Please return marked up set of drawings with corrections.The applicant shall obtain clearances/approvals for the following prior to building permit issuance: - Planning Division approval on the corrected/final set of drawings (647-5804.) Previously approved plans should be submitted to expedite the process. - Fire Department approval on the corrected/final sets of drawings ((714)573-6100) - Police Department approval on the corrected/final set of drawings (647-5840) - Public Works Agency approval (647-5039) - Grading Permit. Application is made through the Building Safety Division (647-5800) and the plan review is by the Public Works Agency (647-5039)Demo Plan:Please provide demo plan to show existing wall to be removed for new openings. 2nd Review Comment: New openings are provided in existing walls at line 7 and 13. Please provide plan to show existing walls to be removed. Sheet TI-A0.1: Scope of work: New interior Van parking – Please elaborate the statement to specify the conversion of the existing warehouse space to parking garage for company fleet vehicles. 2nd Review Comment: Scope of work – There are four (4) new openings in wall gridline 7, and five (5) new openings in wall gridline 13 per structural plan (sheet S-3.2). Please revise scope of work accordingly. Sheet TI-A1.1:Please provide more information for the existing ramps and stairway to the office building. Show all required dimensions, including landings, handrails, handrail extensions, and guardrails. 2nd Review Comment: Response was incomplete. Please provide ramp elevation/section to show ramp slope, landings, handrails, handrails extensions at top and bottom. (11B-405; 11B-505)Sheet TI-A2.0: For clarity, please show/specify occupant loads of each area on the plan. 2nd Review Comment: The location of the exit signs showed on plan were misplaced (wrong locations). Please coordinate with exit doors and revise plan accordingly. Sheet TI-A2.0A:Breakroom exit door open to the court: The distance between two hinged doors in series shall be 48 inches minimum plus the width of doors swinging into the space. 2nd Review Comment: Gridline 25, Doors opened to the court – please revise plan to show 48” plus the door widths at the two hinged doors in series. Sheet TI-A2.1: Wall legend: Please provide wall legend for both existing and new walls. Wall line must match with the floor plan. 2nd Review Comment: At gridline 13 – Please clarify why detail 4/AD-1 was callout at the existing concrete wall. Exterior stairs: Please provide stairway plan show compliance with Section 1011, and 11B-504. Doors opening into a landing shall not reduce the landing to less than one-half of the required dimensions. 2nd Review Comment: Exterior stairways provided along the perimeters of the buildings – Please provide enlarged plan(s) for stairways and show compliance with Section 1011, and 11B-504, including handrails, guardrails, and handrails extensions. Details shall be clearly cross-reference onto the plan. Sheet TI-A2.2: Wall Legend: Please clearly provide wall legend for both existing and new. Wall Legend shall match with floor plan. 2nd Review Comment: Wall Legend provided did not match with floor plan. Please provide Wall Legend for existing wall and new wall so that walls can be easily identified. Could not locate door schedule for the office building. 2nd Review Comment: Door schedule provided on sheet TI-A5.1A appeared incomplete. Please provide door schedule for the office building. Sheet TI-A2.4: Grab bar position: please show grab bar height measured to the top of the grab bar (not to the centerline). 2nd Review Comment: Response was incomplete. Not all of the details were revised. Sheet TI-A2.10:Please provide structural support and attachment for the new roof top units. 2nd Review Comment: Referenced to A/TI-A2.12 was not applicable. Sheet TI-A2.12 was not provided. Please coordinate and revise plan accordingly. Sheet TI-AD.1 thru TI-AD14TI-AD.9: Please show dimensions for handrails extensions. 2nd Review Comment: Please Section along the stairway to show handrail extension at top and bottom. Show dimensions.Structural Review Comments:Sheet S-1.0: It appears that the exterior wall openings were permitted under the separate permits (Phase I and Phase I-Revision). On the plan, please clearly identify which wall openings are proposed under this permit application. Revise plan accordingly. 2nd Review Comment: Please provide details for wall anchorage at roof. Seismic retrofit is recommended if existing walls are not anchored to the roof diaphragm. (ASC7-16, Section 12.11)Sheet S-3.2: The elevations provided appear to be proposed elevation with new wall openings – Please revise elevation title block to reflect with the proposed openings. 2nd Review Comment: Wall elevations – Detail 2/SD2 called out on the plan was not applicable. Sheet SD2 was not provided. Please coordinate and revise plan accordingly. Hold-down: Please provide calculation and details for the concrete wall hold-downs. 2nd Review Comment: Please provide clarification for the following:Wall line 7 calculation: Shear check for wall type 4A, 4C, and 4D was “N.G” (no good) – please provide justification the remained existing wall is sufficient to resist the lateral forces/loads. Wall line 13 calculation: The 10% increase in demand-capacity exception did not apply to this condition, since the capacity of the existing lateral load-carrying system (wall) was decreased. Please provide justification/calculation to show the remained existing wall is sufficient to resist the lateral forces/loads.