HomeMy WebLinkAbout267541_3_Corrections.docxTENANT IMPROVEMENT
PLAN CHECK COMMENTS
COMMENTS
Planning & Building Agency
Building Safety Division
20 Civic Center Plaza
P.O. Box 1988 (M-19)
Santa Ana, CA 92702
(714) 647-5800
www.santa-ana.org
PLAN CHECK NO:
101104334
PROJECT ADDRESS:
515 E Dyer Rd
PLAN CHECK ENGINEER:
Le, TungTEL:714
647-5896
EMAIL:
Tle10@santa-ana.orgFAX:714
647-5897
TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION:
III B, SPK
OCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATION(S):
B, S-1, S-2
PLAN CHECK DATES:
REMARKS/RECHECK ITEMS:
APPLICATION
8/20/2020
INITIAL REVIEW
9/2/2020
EXPIRATION
2/16/2021
RECHECKS:
1.10/08/2020
PROJECT APPLICANT CONTACT PERSON:
2.10/29/2020
Doug Hinrichs
3.
TEL:
(949)862-2135
FAX:
VALUATION: $2,000,000.00
EMAIL:
doug.hinrichs@hparchs.com
FLOOD ZONE: X-0602320278J
APPLICABLE CODE: 2019 CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODE (CBC) WITH
CITY OF SANTA ANA AMENDMENTS
General comments and approval requirement
All items noted on this plan check report must be addressed. If you feel that an item is not applicable to your project, note “N/A” and discuss the reason with the plan checker.Please indicate the sheet number and detail to the right of each correction, or note the number on the plans where the correction is made. Resubmit marked original, calculations and this correction sheet. A separate sheet for response may be used.Resubmit 3corrected sets of plans.Please return marked up set of drawings with corrections.The applicant shall obtain clearances/approvals for the following prior to building permit issuance:
- Planning Division approval on the corrected/final set of drawings (647-5804.) Previously approved plans
should be submitted to expedite the process.
- Fire Department approval on the corrected/final sets of drawings ((714)573-6100)
- Police Department approval on the corrected/final set of drawings (647-5840)
- Public Works Agency approval (647-5039)
- Grading Permit. Application is made through the Building Safety Division (647-5800) and the plan review is by
the Public Works Agency (647-5039)Sheet TI-A0.1: Sheet Index: Plans listed under the Sheet Index did not match with provided plans. Plan submittal shall be complete. Please coordinate and revise Sheet Index accordingly. Reminder: Mechanical, Electrical and Plumbing plans are under a separate plan review. Sheet TI-A2.0A:Breakroom exit door open to the court: The distance between two hinged doors in series shall be 48 inches minimum plus the width of doors swinging into the space. 2nd Review Comment: Gridline 25, Doors opened to the court – please revise plan to show 48” plus the door widths at the two hinged doors in series. 3rd Review Comment: Response was incomplete. Sheet A2.0A – Please revise plan to show the relocated door at office breakroom clear away from the maneuver space of the adjacent existing door (24” clear from the opposing door strike edge). Sheet TI-A2.1: Exterior stairs: Please provide stairway plan show compliance with Section 1011, and 11B-504. Doors opening into a landing shall not reduce the landing to less than one-half of the required dimensions. 2nd Review Comment: Exterior stairways provided along the perimeters of the buildings – Please provide enlarged plan(s) for stairways and show compliance with Section 1011, and 11B-504, including handrails, guardrails, and handrails extensions. Details shall be clearly cross-reference onto the plan. 3rd Review Comment: Exterior stairways provided on sheet AD.16 – Please provide the following:Please cross-reference details onto the floor plan. Doors opening onto a landing shall not reduce the landing to less than one-half the required width (Section 1011.6 CBC). Please revise stairway layouts. Stair Plan 4: The handrail extension shall not encroach into the required maneuver space. Sheet TI-A2.2: Could not locate door schedule for the office building. 2nd Review Comment: Door schedule provided on sheet TI-A5.1A appeared incomplete. Please provide door schedule for the office building. 3rd Review Comment: On the plan, please reference to sheet TI-A5.3 for office doors schedule. Structural Review Comments:Hold-down: Please provide calculation and details for the concrete wall hold-downs. 2nd Review Comment: Please provide clarification for the following:Wall line 7 calculation: Shear check for wall type 4A, 4C, and 4D was “N.G” (no good) – please provide justification the remained existing wall is sufficient to resist the lateral forces/loads. 3rd Review Comment: Response was insufficient. Wall calculations for wall line 7, type 4A, pier 2; wall type 4D, pier 1 – The shear check indicated “NG” (no good) – Please clarify. Wall line 13 calculation: The 10% increase in demand-capacity exception did not apply to this condition, since the capacity of the existing lateral load-carrying system (wall) was decreased. Please provide justification/calculation to show the remained existing wall is sufficient to resist the lateral forces/loads. 3rd Review Comment: Response was insufficient. Wall calculations for wall line 13, type 4A, pier 4; wall type 4B, pier 1 – The shear check indicated “NG” (no good) – Please clarify.