HomeMy WebLinkAbout295192_3_Corrections.docxPLAN CHECK COMMENTS
COMMENTS
Planning & Building Agency
Building Safety Division
20 Civic Center Plaza
P.O. Box 1988 (M-19)
Santa Ana, CA 92702
(714) 647-5800
www.santa-ana.org
PLAN CHECK NO:
101112789
PROJECT ADDRESS:
2320 S Redhill Ave
PLAN CHECK ENGINEER:
Le, TungTEL:714
647-5896
EMAIL:
Tle10@santa-ana.orgFAX:714
647-5897
TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION:
III-B, SPK
OCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATION(S):
A-2, B, M, S-2
PLAN CHECK DATES:
REMARKS/RECHECK ITEMS:
APPLICATION
11/23/2022
INITIAL REVIEW
11/26/2022
EXPIRATION
5/22/2023
RECHECKS:
1.2/3/2023
PROJECT APPLICANT CONTACT PERSON:
2.2/11/2023
Heidi Hare
3.
TEL:
(949)246-0492
FAX:
VALUATION: $4,159,863.00
EMAIL:
heidi@jlhare.com
FLOOD ZONE: X-0602320279J
APPLICABLE CODE: 2019 CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODE (CBC) WITH
CITY OF SANTA ANA AMENDMENTS
All items noted on this plan check report must be addressed. If you feel that an item is not applicable to your project, note “N/A” and discuss the reason with the plan checker.Please indicate the sheet number and detail to the right of each correction, or note the number on the plans where the correction is made. Resubmit marked original, calculations and this correction sheet. A separate sheet for response may be used.Resubmit 3corrected sets of plans.The applicant shall obtain clearances/approvals for the following prior to building permit issuance:
- Planning Division approval on the corrected/final set of drawings (647-5804.) Previously approved plans
should be submitted to expedite the process.
- Fire Department approval on the corrected/final sets of drawings ((714)573-6100)
- Police Department approval on the corrected/final set of drawings (647-5840)
- Public Works Agency approval (647-5039)
- Grading Permit. Application is made through the Building Safety Division (647-5800) and the plan review is by
the Public Works Agency (647-5039)
- County of Orange Health Department approval on the corrected/final set of drawings ((714)433-6000)
- School District Compliance Certificate; a copy of the building permit application, signed by the plan check
engineer, shall be required by the School District to verify the scope of work. Refer to the attached handout.Sheet AS1.0: A 60-ft year are required on all four (4) sides for unlimited area building. Please coordinate and revise building area analysis accordingly. 2nd Review Comment: exterior walls of the canopies are considered exterior walls of the building – Please specify 2-hour protection for the structural faming members along the exterior wall lines. Provide fire-protection details for structural beams and columns. Details shall be clearly cross-referenced onto the plan. (704.10)3rd Review Comment:Sheet A2.1, Beam and beam fire-protection details are provided. For clarity, please reference detail 3/A7.0 and 10/A7.0 to floor plan to multiple locations where occurred so that it can be easily located. In addition, please coordinate with structural plans to specify referring to architectural plans for fire-rated protection details. Structural Review Comments: Please remove note “NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION” on all structural plan sheets. Please submit foundation plan and details to the geotechnical engineer for review and approval. The geotechnical engineer shall “review” stamp the plans for conformance with the soil report recommendation. Reminder – resubmit letter for final approval. Foundation plan indicated “Provide soil improvement by others per geotechnical report to mitigate soil liquefaction” – Please specify method of soil mitigation on the plan. 2nd Review Comment: Please provide soil report addressing the soil liquefaction and method of soil mitigation as stated on the foundation plan. Provide two (2) copies. Sheet S2.1: Roof framing plan – 3rd Review Comment: Please coordinate with architectural plans to specify referring to architectural plans for fire-protection for structural member, where occurred (at canopy beams and columns). Lateral / Shear wall – Shear walls are required at gridline B to resist the lateral loads from left portion of the building (left of gridline 5). Please revise plan and calculation to show lateral resisting system along line grid line B. 2nd Review Comment: Sheet S1.1 – Please specify shear wall (SW#) for CMU shear wall panels on gridline B. Coordinate with structural calculation. 3rd Review Comment: Short CMU shear wall panels - Please clarify overturning moment (uplift forces) were considered for wall panel design and supporting foundation. Grade beam may be required. For clarity, please specify wall length for the CMU shear wall panel on the plan. 2nd Review Comment: Please specify wall length for all shear wall panels. Canopy between gridlines 6.4 and 8: Please provide lateral resistance system at wall line A. 2nd Review Comment: Please provide the following: CMU wall at gridline 6.4 (at canopy between line 6 and 7) – Please provide calculation and detail for wall anchorage to roof diaphragm. (ASCE 7-16, Section 12.11)Metal deck diaphragms: the metal deck shall not be used as the continuous ties in the direction perpendicular to the deck span.Cantilever diaphragm: Please provide diaphragm analysis including chord, rotation and deflection. 3rd Review Comment: Metal deck should not consider as rigid diaphragm. Please provide steel columns and footings for lateral resisting system at the canopy (similar to the canopies at grid line 1-6). (End of Comment)