HomeMy WebLinkAbout305691_2_Corrections.docxTENANT IMPROVEMENT
PLAN CHECK COMMENTS
COMMENTS
Planning & Building Agency
Building Safety Division
20 Civic Center Plaza
P.O. Box 1988 (M-19)
Santa Ana, CA 92702
(714) 647-5800
www.santa-ana.org
PLAN CHECK NO:
101116204, 101116205, 101116206
PROJECT ADDRESS:
300 S Figueroa St & 310 S Figueroa St
PLAN CHECK ENGINEER:
Anson So & Gary HuangTEL:714
647-5830
EMAIL:
aso@santa-ana.org
ghuang@santa-ana.orgFAX:714
647-5897
TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION:
II B
OCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATION(S):
A-3, S-1, B
PLAN CHECK DATES:
REMARKS/RECHECK ITEMS:
APPLICATION
8/15/2023
INITIAL REVIEW
8/16/2023
EXPIRATION
2/11/2024
RECHECKS:
1.
PROJECT APPLICANT CONTACT PERSON:
2.
Jason Foggie
3.
TEL:
(949)698-1412
FAX:
VALUATION: $4,300,000.00
EMAIL:
jason.foggie@littleonline.com
FLOOD ZONE: X-0602320256J
APPLICABLE CODE: 2022 CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODE (CBC) WITH
CITY OF SANTA ANA AMENDMENTSAll items noted on this plan-check report must be addressed. If you feel that an item is not applicable to your project, note “N/A” and discuss the reason with the plan checker.Please indicate the sheet number and detail to the right of each correction, or note the number on the plans where the correction is made. Resubmit marked original, calculations and this correction sheet. A separate sheet for response may be used.Resubmit two corrected sets of plans.Meetings between the project applicant/designer and the plan reviewer shall be by appointment only. Please call (714) 647-5830 for an appointment.
GENERAL REQUIREMENTS
Clearances - Obtain any applicable approval from the following agencies prior to permit issuance:
Planning Division – The plans approved by the Building Division must include the Planning approval stamp. Building staff will notify the Planning Division for approval. For approval status, contact the Planning Division at (714) 647-5804 or visit the Planning Division counters.
Public Works Agency (PWA) – Obtain PWA clearance if any of the following applies: project valuation exceeds $30,000, project has added plumbing fixtures, added bedrooms, or project exceeds 500 square foot in new construction (not renovation). After the Building Division approves your project, visit the Building Division counters and request a copy of the approved plan. Bring the approved plan to the PWA counters for approval. After PWA approves your project, return the approved plan to the Building Division counters.
Police Department (PD) – The plans approved by the Building Division must include the PD approval stamp. After the Building Division approves your project, Building staff will notify PD for approval. For approval status, contact the PD at (714) 647-5840 or email PolicePlanCheck@santa-ana.org.
Orange County Fire Authority (OCFA) - Submit plans to OCFA immediately if you answer “Yes” to any part of questions 1 through 10 on the plan submittal criteria. Bring an OCFA approved plan to the Building Division counters for permit issuance. Contact OCFA for approval status.
County of Orange, Health Care Agency, Environmental Health (OC Health) – Submit plans to OC Health if the business involves food service. Contact OC Health for submittal requirements. If OC Health approval is required, bring an OC Health approved plan to the Building Division counters for permit issuance.
School District – After the Building Division approves your project, Building staff will send a School Fee Form to your school district if school fee applies to your project. Applicant shall pay the school fee and bring the signed Certificate of Compliance form to the Building Division counters for permit issuance.
Cal/OSHA – Check the Cal/OSHA permit requirements here.
Plan Check Expiration – This plan check will expire after 180 days from the submittal date unless the applicant request for an extension. The extension request must be in writing and demonstrate a justifiable cause. The Building Official is authorize to grant a one-time extension of additional 180 days. If the extension request is approved, all plan checks will expire after 360 days from the submittal date. No further extension will be granted after 360 days from the submittal date.
MEP Reviews – This review does not include Mechanical, Electrical, and Plumbing (MEP).
Additional plan check fee will be required after the third review on hourly basis.
INSTRUCTIONS:
Plan Check Comments Instructions - Review all corrections and provide a written response.
Redline Pickups Instructions - The drawings markups (Redlines) are available to pick up at the Building Division counters by walk-ins. Appointments are not required. Our business hour is Monday through Thursday and alternative Fridays from 8:00 am to 3:00 pm. See the Holiday and Closed Friday Schedule before you plan your visit.
Resubmittal Instructions – Provide a written response to the Plan Check Comments. Provide two copies of the latest construction document (drawings, calculations, and others related document). Provide one additional copy of drawings for new constructions or additions. Resubmit all construction document with one of the three options below:
Resubmittal Bin:Complete the Plan Check Re-Submittal Form along with the resubmittal. The resubmittal bin is available at the City Hall Ross Annex lobby, Monday through Thursday and alternating Fridays from 8:00 am – 4:00pm. See the Holiday and Closed Friday Schedule before you plan your visit.
Walk-ins: Daily walk-ins are available for resubmittals at first come first serve basis. Please note all scheduled appointments will be served first prior to any walk-ins.
Appointment: Call the Building division at 714-647-5800 to schedule a resubmittal appointment, or contact your assigned permit counter staff for your specific project.
PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS:
Three plan check numbers were created for this project:
PC# 101116204 – New Building for Police Sub-Station – 300 S. Figueroa Street.
PC#101116205 – Trash Enclosure – 300 S. Figueroa Street.
PC#101116206 – New Building for Recreational Center – 310 S. Figueroa Street.
Contact the following reviewers for plan review questions and comments:
Anson So – Architectural Review, aso@santa-ana.org or 714-647-5830
Gary Huang – Structural Review, ghuang@santa-ana.org or 714-647-5862
Architectural corrections have been reviewed and there are not further plan review comments. Please see next page for structural review comments.
Structural Plan Review Comments by Gary Huang.
GUIDELINES:
Comments contained within this report reflect only those of the Building and Safety Division. Additional comments or corrective action may be required by other Departments and/or outside Agencies
This Plan Review Report and all subsequent code references are based upon the most recent version(s) of the 2022 California Building Codes (CBC, CRC, CFC, CEC, CPC, CMC, CGBSC, and CEES)
The approval of plans and any supporting documents does not permit the violation of any section of the adopted building codes or other pertinent local ordinances, or state and federal laws
All listed plan review comments must be adequately addressed before a building permit can be issued Please indicate the sheet number and detail to the right of each correction, or note the number on the plans where the correction is made. Resubmit marked original, c☒ Additional Review Comment:
Sheet A902
Detail 4: Coordinate with structural drawing for roof deck assembly, and provide unit anchorage detail and calculation
[Comment NOT resolve – coordinate with structural detail. There are no concrete cover over metal deck. Revise detail and provide proper unit anchorage detail and calculation for review]
Sheet MR-3
Detail 4: provide structural calculation for both Chlorine and Acid Tank anchorage design
[Comment not resolve – no calculation found for both Chorine and Acid tank anchorage design]
Sheet MR-4
Detail 7: provide/reference roof attachment detail for rods and bracing. Coordinate with structural drawings
[Comment not resolve – no detail found]
Sheet S111
Provide a written letter from the Geotechnical Engineer indicate that all structural notes/details and specification comply with soil report requirements
[Comment not resolve – no verification letter found from the Geotechnical Engineer]
Indicate on plan the locations of equipment housekeeping pad required per sheet MR-1
[Comment Resolved]
Verify background, architectural sheet G021 shown additional wall at equipment room
[Comment Resolved]
Verify background at electrical room, it shown different on sheet G021
[Comment Resolved]
Sheet S112
Provide column size/mark for columns along grid line B
[Comment Resolved]
Provide column size/mark for columns along grid line A
[Comment Resolved]
Sheet S121
Provide proof/justification that the Police substation will not be used as essential facilities; otherwise revise calculation importance factor to I=1.5. Further review is required
[Comment not resolve – provide written letter from the owner indicate that police substation will not be used as an essential facility]
Provide beam ID in calculation package and identify beam calculation correspondingly in the calculation package
[Comment Resolved]
Provide calculation for CMU wall out-of-plane. Justify wall could span 32’-0” at the pool building, 42’-0” at PAAL building, and 21’-0” at the substation
[Comment not resolve – the wall span between floor slab and diaphragm, the reaction at the top of the wall will be restrain by wall out-of-plane framing. Provide calculation and detail how the wall is being restrain by the out-of-plane forces/members]
Provide/justify sub-diaphragm analysis that loads could adequately transfer into diaphragm
[Comment not resolve – provide/ justify sub-diaphragm based on the out-plan-plane forces result from comment 6c]
Provide calculation for out-of-plan anchorage design for detail 1/S401, including anchor breakout
[Comment Resolved]
Provide non-bearing CMU wall to roof detail and reference on plan. Detail 1/S103 not valid w/ concrete filled
[Comment Resolved]
Provide construction detail at pool office where W12x19 and W8x15 beam intersect to CMU wall corner
[Comment Resolved]
SEOR to justify load from library diaphragm bay be transfer to shear wall without drag member(s) or justify library diaphragm with point load
[Comment not resolve – if there are no drag member to tie the police substation and the library, justify the common wall with point load due to the reaction from the police substation diaphragm]
SEOR to justify drag analysis and provide connection detail & calculation (3 locations)
[Comment not resolve – see comment above]
Sheet S122
Provide non-bearing CMU wall to roof detail and reference on plan. Detail 1/S103 not valid w/ concrete filled
[Comment Resolved]
Provide calculation for CMU wall out-of-plane justify wall could span 30’-0” at community room and 17-0” at office
[Comment not resolve – if the wall span between floor slab and diaphragm per SEOR, the reaction at the top of the wall will transfer to diaphragm thru out-of-plane framing. Provide calculation and detail how the wall is being restrain by the out-of-plane forces/members]
SEOR to provide calculation of drag design and calculation for drag connection per detail 11/S401
[Comment Resolved]
Provide out-of-plane design for detail 2/S401 including anchor breakout
[Comment Resolved]
Sheet S201
Wall elevation D: justify wall pier out-of-plan is adequate with 1-#7 to take wall additional lintel weight above opening
[Comment not resolve – calculation page 181, maximum bending moment demand loading diagram should be distributed load with additional pier weight above opening, see loading diagram on sheet S201 of the construction document]
Sheet S301
Detail 6: provide AESS column to base plate connection and anchor bolt placement
[Comment not resolve – please provide section cut indicating bolt spacing and edge distance for the base plate]
Detail 7:
provide transverse reinforcing per ACI 318 10.7.6.1.5 at top of the caisson
[Comment Resolved]
Provide calculation for the grade beam design
[Comment Resolved]
Detail 11: ACI 318 section 25.7.2.4.1 tie ends shall overlap by at least 6”
[Comment Resolved]
Calculation
Page 30: maximum span for W12x19 beam per plan is 24-0” revise calculation
[Comment Resolved]
Page 42: identify W18x35 column on plan
[Comment Resolved]
Page 68: H/r >99. Allowable compressive strength of CMU wall should be equation 8-19 per section TMS 402-2016 section 8.3.4.2.1
[Comment Resolved]
Page 73: shear design demand for CMU pier should be evaluate/distributed by wall rigidity to its pier. Provide calculation indicate how shear force for each pier is derived by rigidity
[Comment not resolve - Shear demand of the CMU pier/wall should be distributed by wall rigidity. Please provide calculation indicate wall pier distribution]
Page 92: calculation page not clear for review. Provide legible print for review
[Comment Resolved]
Page 107: calculation page not clear for review. Provide legible print for review
[Comment Resolved]
Page 120: provide source of caisson design perimeter for review. Information provided was not found in soil report. Further review is required.
[Comment Resolved]
Red marked comment set is available to pick-up at the City Hall.
(End of Comment)