The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About316234_3_Corrections.docxRESIDENTIAL PLAN CHECK COMMENTS Planning & Building Agency Building Safety Division 20 Civic Center Plaza P.O. Box 1988 (M-19) Santa Ana, CA 92702 (714) 647-5800 www.santa-ana.org PLAN CHECK NO: 101119434 PROJECT ADDRESS: 1826 E Kemper Ave PLAN CHECK ENGINEER: Lo, JonathanTEL:714 647-5822 EMAIL: Jlo@santa-ana.orgFAX:714 647-5897 TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: V B OCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATION(S): R-3 PLAN CHECK DATES: REMARKS/RECHECK ITEMS: APPLICATION 5/30/2024 INITIAL REVIEW 6/9/2024 EXPIRATION 11/26/2024 RECHECKS: 1.8/21/2024 PROJECT APPLICANT CONTACT PERSON: 2. John Coral 3. TEL: (714)721-4689 FAX: VALUATION: $86,000.00 EMAIL: john@greenglobalrestoration.com FLOOD ZONE: X-0602320164J Note: Numbers in parenthesis (unless otherwise noted) refer to code sections of the 2022 California Residential Code (CRC); 2022 California Building Code (CBC); CMC = 2022 California Mechanical Code; CPC = 2022 California Plumbing Code; CEC = 2022 California Electrical Code; T = Table; ICC = International Code Council.All items noted on this plan check report must be addressed. If you feel that an item is not applicable to your project, note “N/A” and discuss the reason with the plan checker.Please indicate the sheet number and detail to the right of each correction, or note the number on the plans where the correction is made. Resubmit marked original, calculations and this correction sheet. A separate sheet for response may be used.Resubmit corrected sets of plans.Meetings between the project applicant/designer and the plan reviewer shall be by appointment only. Please call (714) 647-5822 for an appointment. The applicant shall obtain clearances/approvals for the following after obtaining approval from Building and Safety Division, prior to building permit issuance (CHECKED BOXES REQUIRED ONLY): ☒Planning Division approval on the corrected/final set of drawings (647-5804). Previously approved plans should be submitted to expedite the process. ☒Public Works Agency approval (647-5039). ☐Fire Department approval on the corrected/final set of drawings (647-5839 or 647-5700). ☐Police Department approval on the corrected/final set of drawings (647-5840). ☒School District Approval; and a copy of the school fee worksheet, completed by the plan check engineer, shall be required by the School District to verify the scope of the work. ☐Proof of Worker's Compensation Insurance shall be required at the time of permit issuance. ☐Grading Permit. Application is made through the Building Safety Division (647-5800) and the plan review is by the Public Works Agency (647-5039).Comments have been provided on drawing and calculation hard copies in relation to all comments below. Applicant must pick up red marked sets from city prior to resubmittal and return marked up set with resubmittal.DrawingsSheet T1 Provide the following design data on the first sheet (R106.1.1) ☐Sheet Index ☐Occupancy groups (R-3/U) ☐Type of construction (V-B) ☐Automatic Fire Sprinkler (YES or NO) ☐Number of stories. ☒Flood Zone: X ☐Flood Zone: A ☐Flood Zone: AE ☐Floor area per occupancy group, including the existing structure(s) ☐Construction shall comply with the 2022 CRC, CBC, CPC, CMC, CEC, California Green Building Code, and California Energy Efficiency Standards Code editions. Note on plan: Mechanical, electrical and plumbing are not part of this plan review and approval. The Building and Safety Division plan review does not include potential electrical, water, or gas revisions required by any non-city utility company. It is solely on the contractor to ensure proposed addition or alteration can and will meet utility company requirements. MEP are subject to building field inspection.Sheet A-1.0Show Site Drainage and Flow Direction around new addition on Site Plan. Sheet A-2.0Demo Roof Plan – Verify if existing Ridge, Hip, and Framing members are to be demolished as shown/hatched on plan. Coordinate with structural, S-sheets show California Framing over existing.PC #2: Intent is still unclear. Structural plans and detail 3/S5.1 shows new roofing atop existing with no existing to be removed. However, demo roof plan shows existing to be removed and section on sheet A-5.0 shows single roof rafter and ridge. Please fully coordinate and revise architectural and structural as needed to match.Sheet A-3.0Specify Attic Access on plan.Sheet A-4.0Provide dimension from end of wall to new under-floor vent. One ventilation opening shall be within 3 feet of each external corner of the under-floor space. [R408.2]PC #2: Dimension provided does not meet 3’-0” maximum from external corner requirement. Revise to meet requirement.Provide dimension for new under-floor access.Provide dimension from bottom of egress window to FF.Sheet A-5.0Verify proposed roof ventilation. 1/300 ventilation area requirement requires 50% high and 50% low roof vents. This criteria shall be shown to be met. PC #2: Criteria for 1/300 ventilation not justified on plan. It shall be fully shown on plan that vent location requirement is met with existing or new roof ventilations. Roof projection spanning within 5’-0” from property line shall have 1-hour fire rated underside or code approved alternative. Specify on Plan where required and provide detail. Coordinate with structural for accurate section framing. Fix sections as needed. Section 2 does not look to be accurate to new framing.PC #2: See Comment #4. Roof framing and intent is unclear.Sheet S2.2Verify if cripple wall and plywood shear panel occurs along entire wall between existing and addition. Justify new attic ventilation at addition if completely closed off from existing attic space. Specify all new hip and valley framing sizes on plan.New Ridge Board shall be designed as ridge beam, otherwise justify new truss system with California framing atop existing. Provide connection details and support at new Ridge Board ends. Justify load path.Provide connection details between all hip/valley ends.PC #2: Details 1/S5.2 and 2/S5.2 as noted in response is not provided in drawing set.2x6 Rafter shown on plan at California framing is designed as 2x8 in calculations. Revise to match.Verify RR splice detail 7/S5.1 referenced on plan where 2x6 framing is specified. Verify how splice to occur with two separated depths. See also comment #17.See comment #20, identify existing lateral system assumed on plans.Sheet S5.1Detail 3 – Verify adequate shear transfer between new roof and existing roof.CalculationsVerify existing lateral system. If existing utilized existing stucco as lateral system, new shearwalls along same line shall be designed with lower R value for other material wood framed walls. [ASCE 7-16](End of Comment)