HomeMy WebLinkAbout318994_2_Corrections.docxRESIDENTIAL PLAN CHECK
COMMENTS
Planning & Building Agency
Building Safety Division
20 Civic Center Plaza
P.O. Box 1988 (M-19)
Santa Ana, CA 92702
(714) 647-5800
www.santa-ana.org
PLAN CHECK NO:
101120343
PROJECT ADDRESS:
2717 N Lyon St
PLAN CHECK ENGINEER:
Huang, GaryTEL:714
647-5862
EMAIL:
Ghuang@santa-ana.orgFAX:714
647-5897
TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION:
V B
OCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATION(S):
R-3
PLAN CHECK DATES:
REMARKS/RECHECK ITEMS:
APPLICATION
8/7/2024
INITIAL REVIEW
8/15/2024
EXPIRATION
2/3/2025
RECHECKS:
1.
PROJECT APPLICANT CONTACT PERSON:
2.
Alex Pardee
3.
TEL:
(949)683-9861
FAX:
VALUATION: $15,000.00
EMAIL:
paul@DPSpermits.com
FLOOD ZONE: X-0602320163J
GUIDELINES:
Comments contained within this report reflect only those of the Building and Safety Division. Additional comments or corrective action may be required by other Departments and/or outside Agencies
This Plan Review Report and all subsequent code references are based upon the most recent version(s) of the 2022 California Building Codes (CBC, CRC, CFC, CEC, CPC, CMC, CGBSC, and CEES)
The approval of plans and any supporting documents does not permit the violation of any section of the adopted building codes or other pertinent local ordinances, or state and federal laws
All listed plan review comments must be adequately addressed before a building permit can be issued
Please indicate the sheet number and detail to the right of each correction, or note the number on the plans where the correction is made. Resubmit marked original, calculations and this correction sheet. A separate sheet for response may be used.
Applicant shall obtain clearance/approvals from following departments after obtaining approval from Building and Safety Division, prior to building permit issuance
☒Planning Division approval on the corrected/final set of drawings (647-5804). Previously approved plans should be submitted to expedite the process.
☐Fire Department approval on the corrected/final set of drawings (647-5839 or 647-5700).
☐Police Department approval on the corrected/final set of drawings (647-5840).
☐Public Works Agency approval (647-5039).
☐Proof of Worker's Compensation Insurance shall be required at the time of permit issuance.
☐School District Approval; and a copy of the school fee worksheet, completed by the plan check engineer, shall be required by the School District to verify the scope of the work.
☐Grading Permit. Application is made through the Building Safety Division (647-5800) and the plan review is by the Public Works Agency (647-5039).
Applicant must pick up red marked sheet from the City prior to resubmittal and return the marked up set with resubmittal
PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS:Sheet 1Please specify enclosed patio roof slope on the plan, and on the elevationSheet 3Please specify enclosed patio roof slope on the planPlease provide construction detail for how existing roof cricket is connect to new patio roof framing Sheet LRP-3Please note and revise basic wind speed to 95 mphPlease enter appropriate design “applied load” under Step 2EPlease update all changes (highlight) based on appropriate wind speed criteria at 95 mphSheet LRP-4ABased on appropriated design “applied load”, the selected maximum panel span under step III does not work for 4” member. Please revise and select based on the appropriate applied load Sheet LRP-6Provide/revise determine allowable width per corrected wind loadProvide selection for Step IV-B for seismic analysis Sheet LRP-7Provide selection for Step VI for allowable gable beam span Provide selection for footing size under Step VIISheet E40-4 to Sheet E40-8Provide/revise selection based on the appropriate wind load at 95 mph.Plan review comments above is no longer valid. The applicant hired Plump Engineering, inc. to provide engineered design for the patio cover/enclosure instead of using IAPMO pre-approval drawings. See below for latest review comments based on Plump Engineering drawings & calculation.
2ndPLAN REVIEW COMMENTS (10/2/2024):Slab on grade shall be minimum 4” thick with reinforcing #4 bars at 18” on center, each way. Provide structural calculation justification that roof panel is able to span 10’-0”. Provide additional roof framing where required. Provide structural calculation justification that 3x8x0.042 ridge beam w/ 12 gage insert is able to span 21’-0”Provide structural detail of the ridge beam in detail 13/S300EOR to provide missing reference to details 3/S300, 4/S300, 7/S300, 8/S300. Provide missing component in detail 13/S300EOR to provide construction detail for California roofing connecting to pre-fab roof panel shown per detail 6/S300. Detail 1/S100 does not capture all relevant info. Per calculation page 2, lateral resisting system is selected as “light-frame wall with shear panels for all other materials”. EOR to provide locations, and length of the light-frame wall panels. Provide structural calculation justification. Suggest to design the lateral resisting system as “Cantilevered columns system detailed to confirm to the requirements for: steel ordinary cantilever columns” (G2 per ASCE Table 12.2-1). SEOR to revise all calculation (e.g. columns design) as a cantilevered column, and justify the footing is adequate to transfer column moment to footingSEOR to coordinate design live load. Structural calculation shown live loads as 10 psf; however, sheet S001 indicate design live load as 20 psfEOR to provide footing dimension. Detail 1/S200 to reference footing on plan Sheet S100. However, sheet S100 only indicate footing width. (End of Comment)