HomeMy WebLinkAbout320282_2_Corrections.docxRESIDENTIAL PLAN CHECK
COMMENTS
Planning & Building Agency
Building Safety Division
20 Civic Center Plaza
P.O. Box 1988 (M-19)
Santa Ana, CA 92702
(714) 647-5800
www.santa-ana.org
PLAN CHECK NO:
101120768
PROJECT ADDRESS:
4918 W Roberts Dr
PLAN CHECK ENGINEER:
Huang, GaryTEL:714
647-5862
EMAIL:
Ghuang@santa-ana.orgFAX:714
647-5897
TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION:
V B
OCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATION(S):
R-3
PLAN CHECK DATES:
REMARKS/RECHECK ITEMS:
APPLICATION
9/12/2024
INITIAL REVIEW
10/10/2024
EXPIRATION
3/11/2025
RECHECKS:
1.
PROJECT APPLICANT CONTACT PERSON:
2.
Tony Vu
3.
TEL:
(714)636-4200
FAX:
(714)636-4201
VALUATION: $100,000.00
EMAIL:
FLOOD ZONE: X-06059C0256J
GUIDELINES:
Comments contained within this report reflect only those of the Building and Safety Division. Additional comments or corrective action may be required by other Departments and/or outside Agencies
This Plan Review Report and all subsequent code references are based upon the most recent version(s) of the 2022 California Building Codes (CBC, CRC, CFC, CEC, CPC, CMC, CGBSC, and CEES)
The approval of plans and any supporting documents does not permit the violation of any section of the adopted building codes or other pertinent local ordinances, or state and federal laws
All listed plan review comments must be adequately addressed before a building permit can be issued
Please indicate the sheet number and detail to the right of each correction, or note the number on the plans where the correction is made. Resubmit marked original, calculations and this correction sheet. A separate sheet for response may be used.
Applicant shall obtain clearance/approvals from following departments after obtaining approval from Building and Safety Division, prior to building permit issuance
☒Planning Division approval on the corrected/final set of drawings (647-5804). Previously approved plans should be submitted to expedite the process.
☐Fire Department approval on the corrected/final set of drawings (647-5839 or 647-5700).
☒Police Department approval on the corrected/final set of drawings (647-5840).
☒Public Works Agency approval (647-5039).
☐Proof of Worker's Compensation Insurance shall be required at the time of permit issuance.
☒School District Approval; and a copy of the school fee worksheet, completed by the plan check engineer, shall be required by the School District to verify the scope of the work.
☐Grading Permit. Application is made through the Building Safety Division (647-5800) and the plan review is by the Public Works Agency (647-5039).
Applicant must pick up red marked sheet from the City prior to resubmittal and return the marked up set with resubmittal
PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS:
Note on plan: Mechanical, electrical and plumbing are not part of this plan review and approval. MEP are subject to building field inspection.
[Comment resolved]
Attic access and Ventilations – Show on the plans the location of attic vent locations. IF 1/300 ventilation factor is used, then identify on plan that upper ventilator shall be located not more than 3’-0” below the ridge or high point; otherwise 1/150 ventilation factor shall be used. (R806.1)
[Comment resolved]
Sheet S1
EOR to provide additional shear wall along grid 1.5; otherwise justify how lateral force is transfer to grid 1 and grid 2
Comment not resolve – EOR to verify 4x framing along grid line 1.5 is a ceiling member. Provide drag member at the roof level and provide construction detail]
Provide holdown for shear wall along grid line C
[Comment resolved]
2x roof rafter along grid line 2 from the roof framing plan shall be design as a drag member. Provide structural calculation justify combine bending & axial load per NDS 3.9.2.
[comment not resolve – EOR to provide calculation justification for 2x roof rafter as a drag member taking combined bending and axial load per NDS 3.9.2]
Provide drag member design along grid line 1.5. See comment 3A above.
[Comment not resolve – previous comment, EOR to provide calculation for drag member design along grid 1.5]
Sheet SD1
Detail 5
Provide maximum rod embedment
[Comment not resolve – verify maximum rod embedment, the embedment and footing depth are at the same depth. Provide minimum concrete clearance]
Provide maximum footing size for underpin where rod extend deeper than (E) footing. Indicate concrete clearance and footing reinforcing
[Comment resolved]
EOR to verify note 4. Note stated “minim end distance equal 5’-0”. Thus holdown at grid line A/1 will not work?
[Comment not resolve – EOR to verify note #4, minimum end distance is at 5’-0”?]
Prior to submit the hard-copy drawings for approval and permit issuance. It is at applicant’s discretion, as an option, to submit a full-set electronic drawing (in pdf format) for a courtesy review. Please include the original red-marked comment drawing set, red-marked calculation, and all supporting document (revised calculation, etc.) for an expedite review. (End of Comment)