HomeMy WebLinkAbout335836_2_Corrections.docxRESIDENTIAL PLAN CHECK
COMMENTS
Planning & Building Agency
Building Safety Division
20 Civic Center Plaza
P.O. Box 1988 (M-19)
Santa Ana, CA 92702
(714) 647-5800
www.santa-ana.org
PLAN CHECK NO:
101125691-101125781
PROJECT ADDRESS:
2020 E First St
PLAN CHECK ENGINEER:
Lo, Jonathan;
Huang, Gary; TEL:
714-647-5822;
714-647-5862;
EMAIL:
Jlo@santa-ana.org;
Ghuang@santa-ana.org;
TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION:
V B, SPK
OCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATION(S):
R-3, U
PLAN CHECK DATES:
REMARKS/RECHECK ITEMS:
APPLICATION
1/6/2026
INITIAL REVIEW
1/8/2026
EXPIRATION
7/5/2026
RECHECKS:
1.3/6/2026
PROJECT APPLICANT CONTACT PERSON:
2.
Cailey Hollero
3.
TEL:
(949)299-3828
FAX:
VALUATION: $35,000.00
EMAIL:
Cailey.Hollero@meritagehomes.com
FLOOD ZONE:
GUIDELINES:
Comments contained within this report reflect only those of the Building and Safety Division. Additional comments or corrective action may be required by other Departments and/or outside Agencies
This Plan Review Report and all subsequent code references are based upon the most recent version(s) of the 2025 California Building Codes (CBC, CRC, CFC, CEC, CPC, CMC, CGBSC, and CEES)
The approval of plans and any supporting documents does not permit the violation of any section of the adopted building codes or other pertinent local ordinances, or state and federal laws
All listed plan review comments must be adequately addressed before a building permit can be issued
Please indicate the sheet number and detail to the right of each correction, or note the number on the plans where the correction is made. Resubmit marked original, calculations and this correction sheet. A separate sheet for response may be used.
Applicant shall obtain clearance/approvals from following departments after obtaining approval from Building and Safety Division, prior to building permit issuance
☒Planning Division approval on the corrected/final set of drawings (647-5804). Previously approved plans should be submitted to expedite the process.
☒Fire Department approval on the corrected/final set of drawings (647-5839 or 647-5700).
☒Police Department approval on the corrected/final set of drawings (647-5840).
☒Public Works Agency approval (647-5039).
☐Proof of Worker's Compensation Insurance shall be required at the time of permit issuance.
☒School District Approval; and a copy of the school fee worksheet, completed by the plan check engineer, shall be required by the School District to verify the scope of the work.
☒Grading Permit. Application is made through the Building Safety Division (647-5800) and the plan review is by the Public Works Agency (647-5039).
Comments have been provided on drawing and calculation hard copies in relation to all comments below. Applicant must pick up red marked sheet from the City prior to resubmittal and return the marked up set with resubmittalComments have been provided on drawing and calculation hard copies in relation to all comments below. Applicant must pick up red marked sets from city prior to resubmittal and return marked up set with resubmittal.
Instead of printing hard-copy drawing sets for the next resubmittal review, applicants may, at their discretion, submit a complete set of drawings in electronic (PDF) format for review prior to final permit issuance. The resubmittal package shall include the original and 1st resubmittal review scanned redlined drawing set, redlined calculations, and all pertinent supporting documentation, including revised calculations. Architectural Plan CheckDocumentationOrange County Fire Authority (OCFA) review and approval is required prior to Building and Safety permit issuance. It is recommended to submit plans to OCFA to avoid delays. Building and Safety division do not assist with obtaining approval from OCFA.Grading permit shall be applied and obtained prior to Building and Safety permit issuance. Grading review and approval is completed by the Public Works division. Building and Safety division do not assist with obtaining Grading Permit. All drawings and supporting documents shall be prepared, stamped, and signed by a California licensed architect or registered professional engineer. (CRC R301.1.3, CBC 107.1 and 107.3.4.1)Applicant to verify if proposed project site will be completed in multiple phases. A complete phasing plan shall be provided including any temporary office use or multiple construction phasing. It shall be specified if any fencing, barrier, or exposed lumber will be present during phasing and how it will be accommodated. Phasing plan shall be reviewed and approved by OCFA.PC #2: Comment has not been fully addressed. Project phasing shall be decided by applicant and a full phasing plan shall be provided to city identifying which areas are covered within which phases. Temporary sales office has been submitted, so it is to assume there will be construction phases. No architectural site plan has been provided, incomplete review completed. Full site plan shall be provided to allow for full review of accessibility, fire protection, and shall include all applicable items, but is not limited to the following:The location of all proposed structures, which are dimensioned and uses labeled.Driveways and walkwaysOff street parking, guest parking, accessible parking spacesPC #2: Parking and accessible parking provided on Site Plan is shown to be outside of PL. All guest parking or resident parking shall be provided within property.Site accessibility and accessible routes fully detailed. Note that for clarity, it is acceptable to provide a separate site accessibility plan.PC #2: Accessible route is not clear, please make route more legible. All site accessibility shall be fully noted and provided including but not limited to [11B-202:ParkingRampsGatesStairsEV-ready space and EV charging stationsPC #2: Not addressed.Landscape area and total square footages of landscapingPC #2: Not addressed.Adjoining streets & easements on the propertyPC #2: Please clarify on site plan where the new emergency access easement for neighboring lot occurs. OCFA review and approval is required for proposed relocation.Property lines of the subject property with the lot dimensionsPC #2: Lot dimension has not been provided. Full lot dimension shall be provided. Dimension between new structures and property line shall also be provided.Curb line, drive approaches, and improvements within parkway PC #2: Not addressed.Dimension the distance between the curb and property linePC #2: Not addressedTrash enclosures & ground mounted equipment (i.e. HVAC, etc)PC #2: Trash enclosure is shown to be outside of property line. All trash enclosures shall be within property.Electrical transformersExisting or proposed lot walls and fences. Include label of wall height and materialPC #2: Lot walls and fences are not identified on site plan. North arrow and scale of drawingSite lightingPC #2: Site lighting not identified on site plan.Accessory structures (e.g. Patios, gazebos, public gathering structures, etc…)PC #2: Accessory structures not identified on site plan. Specify any accessory structures proposed.Exterior stairwaysPC #2: Not addressedExit dischargePC #2: Not addressedCommon area designPC #2: Verify if there is a common mail area or mailboxes that will be provided. Accessible common mail area or boxes shall be noted on Site Plan and accessible details provided.DrawingsSheet C1
Provide all address range on main cover title and Title Block on all sheets including other consultant sheets.
PC #2: Units 1-59 have been provided, verify units 60-86 address being omitted from cover sheet and title block.
Provide a project description with a complete and detailed scope of work on the cover sheet of the plans.
PC #2: Scope of work shall be more detailed to proposal, “86 townhome style condominiums” does not adequately identify the proposed work, these are not all townhouses.Provide T24 sheets in drawing set. T24 compliance shall be revised to latest version EnergyPro 9.4.On the title sheet provide the following:The maximum allowable building height in feet and number of stories. (CBC 504.1, Table 504.3 & Table 504.4)List any exceptions or special conditions used to increase the building height or number of stories.Provide allowable area calculations (CBC 506.2 & Table 506.2)Provide calculations for area frontage increase (CBC 506.3)PC #2: Comment not addressed. The 2022 California Residential Code allows one- or two-family dwellings up to 3-stories above grade plane. The proposed four-story two-family dwelling with occupied roof shall be in conformance with the 2022 California Building Code. A complete code analysis shall be provided justifying all proposed building analysis meets allowable.Specify which units assigned by planning are associated with which unit types for clarity.Live/work 4-story duplex shall be shown to be in complete compliance with the 2022 California Building Code. This includes but is not limited to:Proposed occupancyAllowable building heights and areasMeans of egress requirementsFire protection requirementsAccessibility requirements. PC #2: Comment not fully addressed, see comment #9.Justify proposed sprinkler type provided for Live/work 4-story duplex. Type NFPA-13R use shall be justified with meeting code requirements. (CBC 903.3.1.2)PC #2: Comment not fully addressed, see comment #9. Justify proposed NFPA-13R use under the 2022 CBC Section 903.3.1.2.Remove California Residential Code reference for the Live/work 4-story duplex.PC #2: Comment not fully addressed, see comment #9.At least ten percent, any fraction thereof rounding to the next highest whole number, but not less than one dwelling unit shall comply with 1102A.3.1. Full compliancy shall be provided and identified on drawings.PC #2: Comment not fully addressed. Response from applicant is in response to duplex. For proposed accessible units within townhomes, provide a summary to identify total vs required being met.Specify which floor deck is located in Unit 1633.1 and Unit 1638.1 Area Tabulation.
Add note on the coversheet for each unit or unit type: Minimum ____ kWdc Photovoltaic system will be submitted under separate a permit and shall be issued prior to building frame inspection request.
For Solar Exemption, applicant must provide calculated kWh required and 2022 CEnC exemption on plans justifying exemption. THIS IS NOT A NOTE
Add the following on the plan:
Deferred Trusses –
Submit two (2) sets of truss calculations and plans to the city for plan check.
The truss calculations and plans shall include review of roof, mechanical and lateral loads (chord/strut & brace loads); also include review of top chord and bottom chord for axial + flexure between panel joints.
The truss calculations and plans shall be stamped, signed and dated by a licensed civil/structural engineer.
The truss plans shall be “review stamped” and “wet” signed by the engineer of record.Sheet GN3Green Building Standards Code checklist shall be completed by applicant. Sheet KN1Provide keynotes and ventilation calculations on appropriate sheets for clarity, ease of review, inspection, and construction. PC #2: Keynotes shall be provided on all appropriate sheets for clarity including sections, elevations, plans. Floor Plan Keynote 2F – Current ICC is not found for proposed product. Provide approved ICC # and CRRC # as required for proposed roof tile.PC #2: Comment not fully addressed. Proposed roofing note shall be referenced on plans, sections, or elevations for clarity. For roofing that requires cool roofing per Title 24 Energy Compliancy, provide CRRC # on drawing set. This is typical for all different roofing types. Sheet A1-1Attached garage – For each dwelling unit, install a listed raceway to accommodate a dedicated 208/240-volt branch circuit (40 amp). On the plan, please show compliance with Section 4.106.4.1. Typical ALL units.
Smoke Alarms – Provide smoke alarm(s) in each sleeping room; in each area giving access into each sleeping room; in basement and habitable attics. These shall be shown on Architectural drawings. [R314 & 907.2.11.2]Typical ALL units.
Carbon Monoxide Alarms – Provide carbon monoxide alarms at outside of each sleeping area, in the immediate vicinity of the bedroom(s); on every level of a dwelling unit including basements. These shall be shown on Architectural drawings. [R315 & 915]Typical ALL units.Garage ceiling height provided on plan shall be from lower garage floor elevation. Typical ALL units.Add note at FLEX area to clarify FLEX area is not to be used as a sleeping room. Typical ALL unitswhere applied.
Handrails shall be continuous the full length of the flight. Ends shall be returned or terminate in posts. (R311.7.8.2 & 1014)Typical ALL units.
PC #2: See comment #9, for handrails within units under 2022 CBC, handrail within accessible units shall extend horizontally not less than 12” beyond the top riser and continue to slope for the depot of one tread beyond the bottom riser. [CBC 1014.6]Verify keynote 6G referenced at deck, note does not look to be correct.
Balconies, decks and exterior stairway exposed to weather and sealed underneath shall be waterproofed and sloped a minimum of ¼” unit vertical in 12 units horizontal (2%) for drainage. Specify manufacturer and ICC report number of waterproofing on the plan. Typical ALL units.
Provide door and window schedule. On the plan, please specify U-factor (0.3 max) and SHGC (0.23 max) for building fenestration, per Title 24 calculation. Typical ALL units.Sheet A1-2Provide justification for proposed roof deck area as occupied roof vs additional story as well as any requirements that pertain to each per 2022 CBC.PC #2: Comment not fully addressed. See comment #9. Occupied roof requirements shall be shown to be met, else area shall be added to 4th story. Sheet A1-3Verify if attic space occurs above 4th floor hall. It is unclear between Sections. Provide full dimension on sections and elevations.PC #2: Provide attic access to attic space above as required.Verify height of roof deck trellis. No element over occupied roof greater than 48” above surface of occupied roof allowed. [CBC 503.1.4.1]PC #2: Comment not fully addressed. See comment #9 and #31.Sheet A2-1Verify section # and sheet reference in Section callouts. Callouts do not look correct.Identify hatch provided in garage, it is unclear what hatch is. Typical ALL units.PC #2: Hatches being referenced to sheet GN1 shall either be clearly referenced on sheet to where to be found or symbol identification shall be provided on sheet where occurs. Sheet A3-1Verify section # and sheet reference in Section callouts. Callouts do not look correct.Sheet A4-1Verify section # and sheet reference in Section callouts. Callouts do not look correct.Sheet A5-1Provide approved ICC # for proposed roof tile.PC #2: Comment not fully addressed. Proposed roofing note shall be referenced on plans, sections, or elevations for clarity. For roofing that requires cool roofing per Title 24 Energy Compliancy, provide CRRC # on drawing set. This is typical for all different roofing types. Show proposed attic ventilation on roof plan.Provide full height of trash enclosure on elevations and sections.Sheet A5-2Provide calculations for attic ventilationProvide approved ICC # for proposed roof tile.Show proposed attic ventilation on roof plan.Provide full height of trash enclosure on elevations and sections.Sheet B200-1Verify building numbers provided in special acoustical design notes, numbers do not match any building numbers found.Identify hatch found on third floor plan, it is unclear what hatch pertains to.Sheet B200-2Verify parapet noted on elevation dimensions on Front Elevation. If parapet occurs, provide and reference details.Specify insulation rating on walls, floors, and roof to match T24 compliance. Typical ALL Buildings.PC #2: Comment not fully addressed. Insulation value not found on building sections as noted in response.Sheet B601-3Provide dimension to top of structure on elevations and sections. Typical ALL Buildings.Provide attic ventilation for gable vents specified on plans. Typical ALL Buildings.Provide gable vent dimensions for all different sizes shown on elevations. Typical ALL Buildings.Sheet B601-4Provide attic calculation for high main roof attics for each unit. Show proposed attic ventilation on roof plans. Typical ALL Buildings.PC #2: Provide full compliance to code requirement being met to meet unvented attic space. Simply noting that spray foam insulation does not suffice. See additional comments. [R806.5, 1202.3]Identify hatch provided on roof plan. Typical ALL Buildings.PC #2: Hatch identified noted in response is not legible, revise hatches as required. Verify where hatch is found on plans.Identify attic ventilation symbol, no legend provided.Verify proposed attic ventilation shown on plans with number of proposed calculated. Areas do not look to match required. PC #2: Comment not fully addressed. Attic Area 3 calculation specifies (2) vents, however, only (1) vent is found on roof plan. Sheet FD.1Detail 5 – Specify inner plywood information including type and nailing in attic space or reference where information is found. GA File WP does not provide information.Detail 12 – Dimensions specify per plan, verify where provided on plan.Detail 24 – Verify where GA File WP occurs, does not look to match fire rated details provided. PC #2: Detail 5 references GA File WP 3370 and 3642. Please provide detail for GA File WP 3370 sim to 3642 and 3269.Additional PC #2 CommentsSheet C1Unit 25L1.1 area tabulation shows work area square footage. Verify what this square footage is intended for as applicant response has revised unit to not be a live/work space.Sheet GN1Revise hatch for proposed spray foam area provided in Symbols, hatch is not legible. Area is also not clear on plans where occurs, this shall be clear as to where proposed unvented attic space occurs. Note also mentions “livable space”. Any proposed livable attic space or space that may be utilized as livable space in the future shall be noted on plans and shown to meet habitable requirements.
Structural Plan Review Comments:Sheet SN1Provide written letter from the Geotechnical Engineer stating that structural foundation plan, details, and specifications related to the soil properties are comply with soil report[No letter found in the re-submitted package. Provide written letter from the Geotechnical Engineer for review]Provide project design criteria on plan, such as geotechnical info, seismic design parameters, and wind design parametersSheet SN2Detail 15: provide legible note for the edge distance from the anchor bolt to footing edge. Detail 17: EOR to specify detail on plan where it occursEOR to provide calculation justification how lateral loads transfer from roof truss thru blocking to shear wall below Provide connection to complete load pathSheet S1-1.0:Provide calculation justification for the hardy panel footing design, including size, and reinforcing[comment not complete – specify on plan hardy panel required footing concrete compression strength f’c = 4000 psi per calculation]Sheet S1-2.0:EOR to specify on plan when detail 6/SD2 is occur, specify which types of drag strap is used. Typical at all locationsEOR to specify on plan typical bearing wall stud size at each floor. Provide calculation justification for review [Framing note #16 indicated bearing wall stud either 2x4 or 2x6. Calculation required 2x4 at 12” o.c. on 2nd floor, 2x6 at 16” o.c. on first floor. The stud size and spacing shall be identified on plan. The stud wall size and spacing shall not allowed contractor to select]Provide calculation for lateral analysis for the hardy frame panel design for review[EOR to provide hardy frame design catalog justification that HFX24x12 is capable to resist required seismic/wind loads]Provide framing support design with overstrength factor for Shear wall at 2’0” north of grid line 4 from floor above [No framing support found on plan for supporting discontinuous lateral framing; The omega overstrength factor for beam calculation #17 to #32 should be 2.0. No reduction is allowed to 1.4. EOR to revise all calculation for review] EOR to identify all floor joist at each individual bay, and provide calculation for review. Typical at all floors [EOR to clearly identify all floor joist in each individual bay, typical at all floor and all buildings]EOR to verify detail 7/SD2 around grid line 1. Should the detail be beam to beam with hanger connector detail?[EOR to verify, provided detail 7/SD4 is not applicable]EOR to provide construction detail and clarify load path for detail 8/SD4 at where the holdown post occur between the wind beam at grid line 1where the wind beam occurs at Hardy Panel at grid line 5. Detail from Hardy Frame does not seem to represent the actual condition. [provide detail for how wind beam is connected to Hardy Panel. Detail 5/HFX2 does not indicate connection]Sheet S1-2.1:EOR shall specify, where “EWB” is used, which particular lumber material and grade on plan; otherwise, provide each individual calculation justification for each grade of member that are adequateEOR to provide calculation for typical roof joist/floor joist design for reviewAt grid line 4 where (2) 7x14 floor EWB is called out on plan. Provide framing design with overstrength factor support discontinuous shear wall from above. [The omega overstrength factor for beam calculation #22 should be 2.0. No reduction is allowed to 1.4. EOR to revise all calculation for review]Provide calculation for drag member and connection design for 4’0” long shear wall at grid line 3.5[drag load typically is being transfer by using structural framing members to shear wall. For example, at grid line 3.5 has drag length of 14.5’ and the strap is provided for 6’0”. EOR to provide calculation justification that 6’0” long strap is adequate to transfer shear forces. EOR to provide calculation justification how diaphragm shear is being transferred thru shear wall(s) in each braced wall line. This comment is applicable to typical floor for all buildings] Provide calculation for diaphragm design at each floor and identify the diaphragm nailing requirement on plan [For every shear wall design, EOR shall provide demand and capacity for the horizontal diaphragm ratio check against the detail 1/SD2. In addition, EOR to select/indicate on each floor plan which horizonal diaphragm sheathing to be used from detail 1/SD2]See sheet S1-2.2 and sheet S1-2.3 for additional review comments Sheet S1-2.2:EOR to provide complete shear wall calculation for building 200 for review. Calculation shall provide a diagram where the tributary area is taken. Where shear wall is discontinued from floor above, the supporting structural element shall be designed with overstrength factor. EOR to specify on plan when detail 6/SD2 is occur, specify which types of drag strap is used. Typical at all locations. EOR to provide calculation for typical floor/roof joist design for review.Provide calculation for diaphragm design at each floor and identify the diaphragm nailing requirement on plan [For every shear wall design, EOR shall provide demand and capacity for the horizontal diaphragm ratio check against the detail 1/SD2. In addition, EOR to select/indicate on each floor plan which horizonal diaphragm sheathing to be used from detail 1/SD2]See sheet S1-2.3 for additional review comments Sheet S1-2.3:It appears per calculation page L1 that lateral load vertical distribution only consider to 32’-0” as roof level. EOR shall either Distribute the lateral load using 42’-0” per architectural drawing, or Analyze the extension per Ch.13 of ASCE 7 as an architectural component It appears on the lateral analysis that structural calculation provided only for unit 25L1.1R. EOR to either Provide building separation, or Provide analyze both units together as one building and provide drag analysis and framing for review. Further review is requiredEOR to verify shear wall at grid line 3.5, calculation page W3.5 yield 312 lb of uplift. Provide holdown as requiredProvide construction detail for lattice beam to 6x12 drop beam Provide construction detail for 6x6 lattice post column base, BC, to deck joist connectionSheet S2-2.0:EOR to provide calculation for beams and columns design that are supporting discontinue shear wall with overstrength factor. Typical for all buildings [South of grid line 3B, calculation B17 required 7x14, revised beam size on plan. In addition, overstrength factor shall be 2.0 and no reduction is allowed. Revise calculation and drawing to match]See sheet S-2.1 for additional commentsSheet S2-2.1:EOR to identify each floor joist and provide calculation for review EOR to provide complete shear wall design for building 601A in both directions. Clearly identify the grid line, tributary area used. [EOR to provide updated building 601 calculation. Calculation provided does not match with construction drawings. for exampleBuilding 601 Calculation sheet W1A identify 3rd floor; however, no 3rd floor drawing found on the construction package, should it be 2nd floor? If it is for 2nd floor, the shear wall length on the calculation does not match with provided calculation.Building 601 Calculation sheet W1B identify grid line 1B; however, no grid line found on sheet S2-2.1. should it be for grid line MB according to drawing sheet S2.2.1Building 601 Calculation sheet WMA identify 3rd floor; however, no 3rd floor drawing found for building 601. If it is for 2nd floor, then the tributary area used it not matching with calculation sheet WMB. Building 601 Calculation sheet WMB required (3) three shear walls at least 4’-6” long. Drawing only provided 4’-0”. Update drawing/calculation to matchProvide shear wall calculation for Building 601 in the north/south direction. Clearly identify the grid line, building number on the calculation. Calculation shall match each grid line with the construction document at each floor. Further review is required]EOR to provide drag analysis/design for review. Reference drag detail on plan [drag load typically is being transfer by using structural framing members to shear wall(s). Calculation page 83-163 does not identify such design. EOR to provide calculation justification how diaphragm shear is being transferred thru shear wall(s) in each braced wall line. This comment is applicable to typical floor for all buildings] EOR to specify on plan which types and number of drag strap is sued when detail 6/SD2 is called-out on plan Calculation for shear wall design does not match at 1A at 3rd floor. Calculation required 7835 lb, but in the APA program only input at 4764 lb[EOR to provide complete calculation justify how original shear force 7835 lb was derived for W1A. Per comment respond, the worst case stated 383 plf, provide justification how the number was determined.]EOR to identify all floor joist at each individual bay, and provide calculation for review. Typical at all floors Sheet S2-2.2:Provide calculation for diaphragm design at roof and at each floor for review. Indicate on plan the diaphragm naming pattern requirement on plan [For every shear wall design, EOR shall provide demand and capacity for the horizontal diaphragm ratio check against the detail 1/SD2. In addition, EOR to select/indicate on each floor plan which horizonal diaphragm sheathing to be used from detail 1/SD2]EOR to specify required strap holdown on plan per calculation requirement, for example shear wall at front of the building required CS14 per calculation EOR shall specify, where “EWB” is used, which particular lumber material and grade on plan; otherwise, provide each individual calculation justification for each grade of member that is adequate.Sheet S3-2.0:EOR to identify each floor joist and provide calculation for review. Sheet S3-2.0:EOR to identify all floor joist at each individual bay, and provide calculation for review. Typical at all floors EOR to provide drag analysis/design for review. Reference detail on plan typical for all floor [drag load typically is being transfer by using structural framing members to shear wall(s). Calculation page 83-163 does not identify such design. EOR to provide calculation justification how diaphragm shear is being transferred thru shear wall(s) in each braced wall line. This comment is applicable to typical floor for all buildings] EOR to provide complete shear wall design for BLDG 602A in both directions. Clearly identify the grid line. [EOR to provide updated building 601 calculation. Calculation provided does not match with construction drawings. for exampleBuilding 602 Calculation W1 at roof level identify required shear wall length 3.08’, 8.75’, 3.67’, 3.08’, 8.75’, 3.67’; however, drawing sheet S3-2.2 provided additional shear wall at 9.5 ft and 7.08 ft. Building 602 calculation W1A at 3rd floor identify shear walls; however, no drawing provided in the construction document for 3rd floor framingBuilding 602 calculation W1B at 2nd floor identify shear wall length 4’, 4’, 4’; however, drawing sheet S3-2.1 identify different length.Further review is required]Sheet S3-2.2:EOR to provide calculation for diaphragm design at each floor and identify diaphragm nailing requirement on plan [For every shear wall design, EOR shall provide demand and capacity for the horizontal diaphragm ratio check against the detail 1/SD2. In addition, EOR to select/indicate on each floor plan which horizonal diaphragm sheathing to be used from detail 1/SD2]Sheet S4-2.0Provide detail 6/SD5 for review. Sheet S4-2.2The review comments for building 802A, would be similar to those from buildings 601A, 602A, such as drag analysis/design, and references to plan; provide diaphragm design for each floor and identity diaphragm nailing patter requirement, etc. [For every shear wall design, EOR shall provide demand and capacity for the horizontal diaphragm ratio check against the detail 1/SD2. In addition, EOR to select/indicate on each floor plan which horizonal diaphragm sheathing to be used from detail 1/SD2][drag load typically is being transfer by using structural framing members to shear wall(s). Calculation page 83-163 does not identify such design. EOR to provide calculation justification how diaphragm shear is being transferred thru shear wall(s) in each braced wall line. This comment is applicable to typical floor for all buildings] Sheet TE1Roof framing plan: EOR to verify detail 1 called-out. It does not seem to be applicable reference. The roof framing plan identify as truss system, where the detail using conventional framing. Provide construction detail for how the roof truss is connect to beam/post interaction at the end of the hip beam Sheet TE2See comments on sheet TE1Sheet CS-0.01Structural calculation includes ORCO wall system. Please identify the ORCO wall on the construction document set for review. Soil report specify footing to be minimum12” wide, in order to get 1500 psf minimum soil bearing pressure. Calculation for the ORCO wall using 1800 psf design soil bearing pressure with 8” wide footing. Revise calculation or provide amendment from the Geotechnical EngineerSheet LS2EOR to provide calculation justification for all gravity and lateral analysis including foundation design for the shade structure [No landscape calculation found. EOR to provide calculation for review] EOR to provide construction details Beam to beam connection[Please provide update construction detail for review]Beam to column connection [Please provide update construction detail for review]Detail 1: area of vertical reinforcing shall comply with ACE 318-19, section 16.3.4.1[Please provide update construction detail for review]
2nd Structural Plan Review Comments:
Sheet S2-2.0
Calculation beam 32 (3.5x14 LSL) for framing members supporting discontinuous shear wall from above indicated beam length at 6’-0”. The actual beam length on plan is +/- 20.5’. revise calculation to match actual condition.
Sheet S3-2.0
Provide calculation for beam 5 ¼ x 18 EWB along grid line 1.1B with (2) two overstrength factors supporting discontinue shear wall aboveBuilding 802ASee similar comments on item #32, and item #43. Provide updated/latest calculation for the building lateral analysis design. The calculation grid line, shear wall length shall match with construction drawings. Typical to all sheets/all buildingsEOR to identify all floor joist at each individual bay, for example, sheet S2-2.0, S2-2.1. EOR to review all sheets. Further review is required. EOR to review drawings and provide all framings that supporting discontinued shear wall above with overstrength factor. Further review is required(End of Comment)
Instead of printing hard-copy drawing sets for the next resubmittal review, applicants may, at their discretion, submit a complete set of drawings in electronic (PDF) format for review prior to final permit issuance. The resubmittal package shall include the original and 1st resubmittal review scanned redlined drawing set, redlined calculations, and all pertinent supporting documentation, including revised calculations.