My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
60C - CDBG ACTION PLAN
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2018
>
05/15/2018
>
60C - CDBG ACTION PLAN
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/10/2018 7:56:28 PM
Creation date
5/10/2018 7:50:12 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
Community Development
Item #
60C
Date
5/15/2018
Destruction Year
2023
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
52
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
other ESG entitle me ntjurisdictions including the City, will utilize assessment and evaluation <br />instruments developed in consultation with the HMIS lead agency and previously funded HPRP <br />grantees. The County ensures ongoing coordination of program design and eligibility standards. The <br />City provides funding to 2-1-1 Orange County, the County's Continuum of Care administrator of the <br />HMIS data entry system. Again in FY 18/19, funding will be provided for HMIS data, Coordinated <br />Entry and technical assistance. 2-1-1 Orange County also administers the Vulnerability Index - <br />Service Prioritization Decision Assistance Tool (VI-SPDAT) to prioritize chronically homeless <br />individuals for affordable housing opportunities. <br />3. Identify the process for making sub -awards and dB cn6e 'I'Wthe ESG allocation available to <br />51s <br />n <br />private nonprofit organizations (including cornmUnity and faith ,,based organizations). <br />In FY 17/18, the Orange County ESG Collaborift'(County of Orange, CitpfAnaheim, City of <br />Garden Grove, and the City of Santa Ana) releAe bpe Requestifor Proposi 'm a unified approach <br />,�..-0 <br />to request, review and fund ESG subrecipients Any�50�.�c)(Br)icganization in goofl;kstanding was <br />i '�' D J llfi' had' dip <br />able to submit a request for funding 4l eligible ESG actlt�I tes application had 'renewable <br />option that was exercised for FY18/10,,IEi5G'jf !mcling This cOl�l b3o�,;,I�rative approach has streamlined the <br />application and review process and all��ts the g thtpes to be , understand the impacts of funding <br />decisions Future Collaborative efforts v� lfilpclude UWRIf d it ie�@8��`il.monitoring forms and other <br />actions to better serQ1home�e`s's and at ris� of hom yes€ #a lyes w. <br />pl �Efii -'k [t.,,� �i31 p �fS ppb tO rl Ciu <br />IR <br />Following the CollaR65tive revle'w`('(he recommendations for funding is considered by the <br />'hi A., rye °�i.� <br />Community Redeveloprrtp t and" sl lg CommIssiq�l before being considered and adopted by the <br />` 3 ] .iii [- 4, <br />City C � ncd�Aijo�15tlons are t�qq drb]�� wlt " �I jr�leI i � "kif ensuring that program funds would be <br />allocated toward eilgli e act! Itq%san the catcgo leslof homelessness prevention, rapid -rehousing, <br />shet t14,data and stach <br />v I, yi F�a -TI[ <br />4. IftheturlsdI on is unable`fta'tneettli✓y'Ihomelessparticipation requirement in 24 CFR <br />576. 05(a), thry f urisdictIon iu t specify its plan for reaching out to and consulting with <br />4i f?Fa L • <br />homeless or foifid y home1es individuals in considering policies and funding decisions <br />regarding facilities"lid seivf cis funded under ESG. <br />The City consults and works with the County and CoC homeless services staff as well as local <br />homeless service providers, homeless advocacy groups, the OC Homeless Task Force, ACC -OC <br />Homeless Task Force as well as neighboring cities and homeless advocates. A previously homeless <br />individual participated on the ESG RFP FY 17/18 funding review panel which FY 18/19 awards are <br />based upon. Individuals who were previously homeless provide assistance in outreach and <br />engagement services and provide feedback to staff. In addition, the CoC's strategy reflects the <br />participation of all 34 cities in Orange County as well as individuals who are homeless or previously <br />homeless, schools and a host of additional organizations. <br />Annual Action Plan <br />2018 <br />OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (e p.06/30/2018) <br />60C-50 <br />IM <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.