My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-24-18_AGENDA PACKET
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
Historic Resources Commission (2009-Present)
>
2018 (AGENDAS,MINUTES AND STAFF REPORTS)
>
05-24-18
>
05-24-18_AGENDA PACKET
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/17/2018 4:22:43 PM
Creation date
5/17/2018 4:20:16 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PBA
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
116
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
HISTORIC RESOURCES COMMISSION MINUTES 6 APRIL 26, 2018 <br />Case Planner Gomez provided a presentation which included the history of the property, <br />project description and overview of the architectural style. The applicant spoke in support <br />of the matter. Chairperson Christy opened the Public Hearing. There were no speakers <br />and the hearing was closed. <br /> <br />MOTION: <br /> <br />1. Adopt a resolution approving Historic Resources Commission Application No. <br />2017-45 and approving Historic Register Categorization No. 2017-44. <br /> <br />2. Recommend that the City Council authorize the City Manager and Clerk of the <br />Council to execute a Historic Property Preservation Agreement No. 2017-49 with <br />Mark, Erwin and Beverly Schauwecker, subject to non-substantive changes <br />approved by the City Manager and City Attorney. <br /> <br />MOTION: Murashie SECOND: Nguyen <br />VOTE: AYES: Christy, Hardy, Hitterdale, Murashie, Nguyen, Rush, Schaefer, <br />Tardif (8) <br /> NOES: None (0) <br /> ABSTAIN: None (0) <br /> ABSENT: None (0) <br /> <br /> <br />***END OF BUSINESS CALENDAR*** <br /> <br /> <br />WORK STUDY CALENDAR <br /> <br />6. HISTORIC RESOURCES EVALUATION PRACTICES <br /> <br />Senior Planner McCann provided a presentation which included information on the <br />following: <br /> <br /> Criteria of selection <br /> Architectural style <br /> Character defining features <br /> Building research and eligibility for local register <br /> <br />Examples of questionable properties were also reviewed. Commission discussion <br />ensued regarding the impact of property additions on the property’s eligibility to be placed <br />on the historic register. Commission agreed that questionable properties should be <br />brought forward to the Commission for consideration. <br /> <br /> <br />COMMENTS <br /> <br />7. STAFF MEMBER COMMENTS <br /> <br />A-6
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.