Laserfiche WebLink
3 <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES April 23, 2018 <br />PUBLIC HEARINGS <br /> <br />2. AMENDMENT APPLICATION NO. 2018-02 TO ALLOW A ZONE CHANGE FROM <br />RESIDENTIAL (R1) TO OPEN SPACE (O) AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. <br />2018-02 TO CHANGE THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE DESIGNATION FROM LOW <br />DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (LR-7) TO INSTITUTIONAL (INS) FOR THE MATER DEI HIGH <br />SCHOOL PARKING STRUCTURE EXPANSION PROJECT LOCATED AT 1202 WEST <br />EDINGER AVENUE– PATRICK MURPHY, APPLICANT <br /> <br />Legal notice published in the Orange County Reporter on April 13, 2018 and notices <br />mailed on April 13, 2018. <br /> <br />At the request of the applicant, the matter was continued from the meeting held on April 9, <br />2018 by a vote of 7:0. <br /> <br />The following disclosures were made: <br /> <br />Commissioner Bacerra spoke with Mike Tardif in regards to the matter. <br />Chair McLoughlin spoke with the applicant in regards to the matter. <br /> <br />Acting Planning Manager Fregoso provided a presentation which included a description of <br />the project, project background, project analysis, and reviewed the elements of the <br />amendment to the Development Agreement. Discussion ensued regarding public <br />improvements, security of the alley, and provisions for the proposed parking structure. <br />Commission asked why the Development Agreement was brought forward for <br />consideration when it is not land use related. Staff indicated that the code requires the <br />Commission to review Development Agreements. The applicant spoke in support of the <br />matter and addressed concerns regarding security of the alley and graffiti. <br /> <br />Chair McLoughlin opened the Public Hearing. The following spoke on the matter: <br /> <br /> Annette Santoyo spoke in opposition; concerned with graffiti, illegal activity and <br />speeding. <br /> Angel Bravo indicated he had a positive experience with the Developer. <br /> Armando Maldonado spoke in opposition; concerned with traffic congestion during <br />construction, security of alley, and dust from construction activities. <br /> Chuck Dobson spoke in favor of the project. <br /> Luis Eulloqui spoke in opposition; concerned with du st from construction activities, <br />traffic congestion, and lack of security. <br /> Gabriel Avelar spoke in opposition; concerned with lack of security, loitering, dust <br />from construction activities, traffic congestion, and placement of parking structure <br />exit.