My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
55B - RESO - M2 PAVEMENT
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2018
>
06/19/2018
>
55B - RESO - M2 PAVEMENT
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/20/2018 12:25:12 PM
Creation date
6/14/2018 8:19:37 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
Public Works
Item #
55B
Date
6/19/2018
Destruction Year
2023
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
342
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
2.0 Methodology <br />2.5 ANALYSIS <br />Based on the latest inspection data and several other factors, including surface type, functional <br />classifications, last construction date, and PCI, pavement deterioration curves (PDCs) or <br />pavement condition prediction models are generated separately for the local and arterial <br />networks. These curves are imperative for a complete PMP to predict future pavement <br />performance and determine maintenance and rehabilitation (M&R) requirements. Figure 2-1 <br />shows a sample PDC with the appropriate M&R. <br />Figure 2-1: Sample Pavement Deterioration Curve <br />100 <br />a I Very Poor \ Reconstruction <br />no <br />Pavement Life (yrs) <br />To develop an accurate PDC, "suspicious' data / anomalies outside of the maximum and <br />minimum envelopes generated from StreetSaver are filtered out. For example, data with PCI <br />increase significantly with age (recording error) or lack of past inspection data must be removed <br />because pavements are load carrying structures, which degrade over time due to the combined <br />action of environmental and traffic. This data filtering processing is critical because pavements <br />with unusual performance would have substantial impact on the PDC behavior and the <br />pavement life cycle consequently. <br />The final PDCs illustrate that the rate of deterioration is fairly slow in the early years of the <br />pavement's design life. During the first 65 percent to 75 percent of a pavement's design life, <br />which varies based on functional classifications and surface type, a pavement deteriorates <br />approximately 40 percent of its quality, i.e. from a PCI of 100 ("Very Good" condition) to a PCI of <br />60 ("Fair" condition). However, the rate of deterioration starts to increase rapidly with age after <br />a pavement reaches this point in its life cycle. Typically, a pavement can deteriorate 40 percent <br />in its quality (PC] quickly drops from 60 ("Fair' condition) to 20 ("Very Poor' condition)) in the <br />next 15 percent to 25 percent of its design life. Although the local and arterial networks have <br />different design life spans, both PDCs share similar characteristics because the pavement will <br />crack and these cracks will propagate out and become severe with continued traffic loadings <br />and weathering without any M&R treatment. Therefore, a PCI of 60 is assigned as the critical <br />City of Santa Ana 2018 Pavement Management Program 2-3 <br />55B-16 <br />Very Good <br />Do Nothing <br />85 <br />— —— — — ——— ———————— <br />———————————————————— <br />.-. <br />Good <br />Surface Seal <br />i 75 <br />_ _--__—_--- — — — <br />— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — <br />c <br />Fair <br />Overlay <br />60 <br />——————————————————— <br />—————————————————— <br />;o <br />Poor <br />Resurfacing <br />u 40 <br />——————————————————— <br />——- <br />-——— <br />--——— — — — — — — <br />E <br />a <br />m <br />a I Very Poor \ Reconstruction <br />no <br />Pavement Life (yrs) <br />To develop an accurate PDC, "suspicious' data / anomalies outside of the maximum and <br />minimum envelopes generated from StreetSaver are filtered out. For example, data with PCI <br />increase significantly with age (recording error) or lack of past inspection data must be removed <br />because pavements are load carrying structures, which degrade over time due to the combined <br />action of environmental and traffic. This data filtering processing is critical because pavements <br />with unusual performance would have substantial impact on the PDC behavior and the <br />pavement life cycle consequently. <br />The final PDCs illustrate that the rate of deterioration is fairly slow in the early years of the <br />pavement's design life. During the first 65 percent to 75 percent of a pavement's design life, <br />which varies based on functional classifications and surface type, a pavement deteriorates <br />approximately 40 percent of its quality, i.e. from a PCI of 100 ("Very Good" condition) to a PCI of <br />60 ("Fair" condition). However, the rate of deterioration starts to increase rapidly with age after <br />a pavement reaches this point in its life cycle. Typically, a pavement can deteriorate 40 percent <br />in its quality (PC] quickly drops from 60 ("Fair' condition) to 20 ("Very Poor' condition)) in the <br />next 15 percent to 25 percent of its design life. Although the local and arterial networks have <br />different design life spans, both PDCs share similar characteristics because the pavement will <br />crack and these cracks will propagate out and become severe with continued traffic loadings <br />and weathering without any M&R treatment. Therefore, a PCI of 60 is assigned as the critical <br />City of Santa Ana 2018 Pavement Management Program 2-3 <br />55B-16 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.