My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
65C - REVIEW PC ACTION
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2018
>
06/19/2018
>
65C - REVIEW PC ACTION
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/2/2018 8:14:41 AM
Creation date
6/14/2018 8:20:10 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
Planning & Building
Item #
65C
Date
6/19/2018
Destruction Year
2023
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
58
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
by 150 parking spaces. The study also identifies the project <br />and its proximity to transit will generate 105 new transit trips. <br />Based on these factors and comparison against other major <br />parking studies prepared by public agencies (San Diego, <br />2011 and Los Angeles, 2016), the parking study states that <br />the project will have a peak demand of 349 vehicles for the <br />residential component only and 399 parking spaces, <br />including the commercial component. The report and staff <br />analysis also show that the site lies along an express and a <br />standard bus line that provide service approximately every <br />10 to 15 minutes during rush hour. These lines connect the <br />project to points west (central Santa Ana, Garden Grove, <br />and Westminster), north (Tustin, Orange, and Placentia), <br />and east (central Tustin). Finally, the Applicant is proposing <br />valet service to nearby parking lots and a parking shuttle to <br />major transit stops to further reduce the demand for on-site <br />parking. <br />Fourth, if the project was designed with narrower driveways, <br />the driveways would not conform to minimum standards <br />established for fire ingress/egress by OCFA and for trash <br />truck ingress/egress established by the Public Works <br />Agency and Waste Management, the current waste collector <br />contracted by the City. As a result, a waiver from the <br />maximum driveway width is required. <br />The three requested concessions could be avoided if the <br />project were constructed using a different site plan and <br />building type. If the project were designed with a multi-level <br />parking and/or subterranean parking structure, or if the <br />applicant used different building materials (non-combustible, <br />Type 1) to construct a taller project, additional area on site <br />would become available to provide open space and parking, <br />and to meet the required rear yard setback. However, these <br />changes would increase development costs, resulting in the <br />affordable housing project becoming financially infeasible <br />due to the significantly -increased financial implications of <br />using Type I construction. <br />The Applicant agrees to indemnify, hold harmless, and defend the City of <br />Santa Ana, its officials, officers, agents, and employees, from any and all <br />liability, claims, actions or proceedings that may be brought arising out of its <br />approval of this project, and any approvals associated with the project, <br />including, without limitation, any environmental review or approval, except to <br />the extent caused by the sole negligence of the City of Santa Ana. <br />Resolution No. 2018 -XX <br />Page 6 of 11 <br />65C-19 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.