Laserfiche WebLink
City Attorney Carvalho, noted when City Council sits in review of a conditional <br />use permit, it is a quasi -adjudicative body, not as a legislative body, and must <br />rely on evidence to support decision. <br />Councilmember Villegas, expressed concern over traffic study. Noted school <br />has twice the amount of parking needed, amount of students will not increase, <br />and timing of traffic study issue. <br />Councilmember Sarmiento, asked staff to explain land use issues that were <br />before the Planning Commission, staff position and recommendation, and if any <br />public funds will be used towards campus. Opined there is a net zero impact or <br />growth. <br />Planning Manager Neal noted planning commission was concerned over traffic, <br />planning staff approval recommendation, and provided review of changes <br />requested by school. Indicated no additional students will be added and <br />confirmed no public funds being used. <br />Councilmember Solorio, expressed support to uphold planning commission <br />decision. Noted any decision made today on conditional use permit would carry <br />on with the land. Opined approval would lead to more traffic and growth. Further <br />discussion ensued. <br />Councilmember Benavides, asked staff if current conditional use permit has a <br />student cap, any potential cap increase, and questioned need for conditional use <br />permit when no student increase is being requested. Further discussion ensued. <br />Mayor Pulido, asked if a student cap may be placed. Opined need to define <br />conditional use permit. <br />Councilmember Tinajero, asked how students with disabilities, English learners, <br />and struggling students will succeed with courses with only two days a week. <br />Further discussion ensued. <br />Councilmember Solorio supports Option 3 to uphold the Planning Commission's <br />decision because CUP run with the land. <br />Councilmember Solorio supports Option 3 to uphold the Planning Commission's <br />decision and Councilmember Tinajero seconded. <br />Councilmember Benavides conveyed that he would not support Option 3. <br />Councilmember Villegas made a substitute motion to support Option 2 with a <br />cap on the number of students of 180. <br />MOTION: .Adopt resolution (Option 2) with conditions including cap on <br />number of students of 180. <br />CITY COUNCIL MINUTES 21 JUNE 19, 2018 <br />1 OA -21 <br />