Laserfiche WebLink
the firm who have rendered legal services in connection with the representation described in the <br />introductory paragraph of this opinion letter. However, we have not undertaken any independent <br />investigation or inquiry to determine the accuracy of such statement other than inquiry of officials of <br />the Successor Agency. <br />Based on and subject to the foregoing, and in reliance thereon, as of the date hereof, we are <br />of the following opinions or conclusions: <br />1. The Successor Agency is a public entity, duly organized and validly existing under <br />and by virtue of the Constitution and the laws of the State. <br />2. The Successor Agency has full legal power and lawful authority to enter into the <br />Successor Agency Agreements. <br />3. Each of (i) Successor Agency Resolution approving and authorizing the execution <br />and delivery of the Successor Agency Agreements and (ii) the Successor Agency POS Resolution <br />approving the Preliminary Official Statement and Purchase Agreement was duly adopted at a <br />meeting of the Agency which was called and held on, respectively, , 2018, and 2018, <br />pursuant to law and with all public notice required by law and at which a quorum was present and <br />acting throughout, and each of the Successor Agency Resolution and the Successor Agency POS <br />Resolution is in full force and effect and has not been modified, amended or rescinded. <br />4. To the best of our knowledge, the authorization, execution and delivery of the <br />Successor Agency Agreements by the Successor Agency and compliance with the provisions thereof <br />by the Successor Agency of its obligations thereunder, will not conflict with, or constitute a breach or <br />default under, in any material respect, any law, administrative regulation, court decree, resolution, <br />ordinance or other agreement to which the Successor Agency is subject or by which it is bound. <br />5. To our current actual knowledge, except as otherwise disclosed in the Official <br />Statement, there is no litigation pending (having been served) or overtly threatened in writing against <br />the Successor Agency that (a) challenges the right or title of any member or officer of the Successor <br />Agency to hold his or her respective office or exercise or perform the powers and duties pertaining <br />thereto; (b) challenges the validity or enforceability of the Bonds or the Successor Agency <br />Agreements; (c) seeks to restrain or enjoin the issuance and sale of the Bonds, the adoption or <br />effectiveness of the Successor Agency Resolution and the Indenture, or the execution and delivery by <br />the Successor Agency of, or the performance by the Successor Agency of its obligations under the <br />Bonds or the Successor Agency Agreements; or (d) if determined adversely to the Successor Agency <br />or its interests, would have a material and adverse effect upon availability of Tax Revenues to pay <br />the debt service on the Bonds, or which, in any manner, questions the right of the Successor Agency <br />to enter into, and perform its obligations under, the Successor Agency Agreements. <br />6. The Successor Agency Agreements have been duly authorized, executed and <br />delivered by the Successor Agency and are valid, legal and binding agreements of the Successor <br />Agency, enforceable in accordance with its respective terms, except as such enforcement may be <br />limited by bankruptcy, insolvency, reorganization or other similar laws affecting the enforcement of <br />creditors' rights in general and by general equity principles (regardless of whether such enforcement <br />is considered in a proceeding in equity or at law). <br />Our opinions are subject to the following qualifications <br />C-2 <br />SA -3-117 <br />