My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
65A - JAIL REUSE STUDY
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2018
>
09/04/2018
>
65A - JAIL REUSE STUDY
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/30/2018 8:08:08 PM
Creation date
8/30/2018 8:03:43 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
City Manager's Office
Item #
65A
Date
9/4/2018
Destruction Year
2023
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
218
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
more vocally started challenging Federal law enforcement apprehension / detention arrest policies <br />involving individuals identified as "illegal" alien residents. California jurisdictions, particularly cities, <br />initiated lawsuits, public protests, and took other steps to limit local jails cooperation and notification <br />procedures to immigration enforcement agencies like ICE whenever these categories of incarcerated <br />residents were housed in local detention facilities. Some jurisdictions have labeled their communities as <br />"sanctuary cities" in greater defiance of the Federal detention notification requirements jail administrators <br />traditionally have followed when handling ICE detainees. <br />In December 2017 after extensive discussion with a range of community residents, Santa Ana advocacy <br />groups, immigrant family service providers as well as the Police Department and Jail staff, the City <br />Council took steps to limit the total number of detainees who could be incarcerated in the City Jail under <br />the contract agreement with ICE. The City Council voted to modify the ICE contract to reflect the new <br />policy direction the Council wanted to pursue. <br />Shortly after the City Council's actions, the Immigration and Custom Enforcement (ICE) California <br />Administrator notified the Jail of their intent to terminate their inmate housing contract with the City within <br />90 days. After this notification, ICE began removing their contract prisoners from the detention facility. <br />Many of the detainees were transferred to a new contract ICE had established with the Orange County <br />Sheriffs Department for the temporary holding of ICE detainees. The loss of the ICE contract reduced <br />the average daily inmate population at the Santa Ana Jail by nearly 250 inmates. This resulted in a new <br />operating fiscal deficit of approximately $10.5 million, not including debt service. <br />With the reduction in daily inmate occupancy caused by several factors (a decline in area criminal activity <br />resulting in fewer arrests and bookings into the Jail, and the elimination of the Immigration and Customs <br />Enforcement (ICE) contract), the Santa Ana City Council decided to focus on repurposing the available <br />floor space at the facility. With a two year temporary infusion of United States Marshal's Service inmate <br />housing needs due to renovation activities at their Los Angeles facility and the question of how the Jail <br />facility could provide future service to the community and/or potential income to the City, this Jail Reuse <br />Feasibility Study was initiated. The Study focuses on the evaluation of several key reuse options of <br />interest to the community and Council members. <br />The Vanir consultant team worked with the City Managers office staff to develop and implement a series <br />of analytical tasks which were designed to identify, evaluate, and prioritize key jail reuse options for City <br />Council and community consideration. As a result of this work, five major building options were <br />established which would be thoroughly assessed by the consultant team and a report developed <br />highlighting the information, results, and conclusions which emerged from the analysis. The options <br />included two jail facility use considerations and three other facility reuse options involving (a) community <br />space usage as a general office work environment, (b) other institutional use as a homeless shelter, and <br />(c) commercial use as a data center. The five study options finalized for this follow-up feasibility analysis <br />is summarized and highlighted in the following: <br />Five Jail Facility Reuse Options Evaluated by Consultant Team <br />i <br />• Jail Use: Includes the continual operational use of the Type II Jail facility as a temporary <br />holding facility which can only detain individuals up to 24 hours. <br />! • Jail Use: Includes expanded rehabilitative services including transitional community reentry <br />treatment programs. <br />• General Commercial Office Use: Includes office complex with individual offices / staff work <br />stations, public lobby / restrooms, staff lounge and other ancillary spaces. <br />• Other Institutional Use: Includes homeless shelter housing with supportive services space. <br />• Commercial Use: Includes development of data center with support space for specialized <br />automated equipment and related required staff offices and other dedicated areas. <br />65A-9 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.