Laserfiche WebLink
Orozco, Norma <br />From: Huizar, Maria <br />Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2018 4:10 PM <br />Cc: eComment <br />Subject: ECOMMENT: Santa Ana Ordinance Review - Council Meeting 9/4/18- Santa Ana <br />Mayor and City Council, <br />Ecomment for your review and consideration of Agenda Item 50A. <br />From: Judy Woolen [ <br />Sent: Tuesday, September 4, 2018 3:46 PM <br />To: Higgins, Taig <THiggins@santa-ana.org> <br />Cc: Jory Wolf < ; Huizar, Maria <MHuizar@santa-ana.org> <br />Subject: FW: Santa Ana Ordinance Review - Council Meeting 9/4/18- Santa Ana <br />Hi Taig, AT&T thanks the City for working on the development of the Telecommunications in the <br />Public Right of Way Ordinance. Noted below are comments to specific sections of the Ordinance <br />AT&T would like to have taken into consideration. Also, the Guidelines mentioned in the Ordinance <br />are still not defined and AT&T would need to see the Guidelines in order to properly comment on the <br />proposed Ordinance. <br />--Section 33-230 (c) To minimize the environmental and aesthetic impacts of wireless facility <br />installations in the public right-of-way. <br />What are the environmental and aesthetic impacts? <br />--Section 33-231 (w) Wireless facility' "facility' or "facilities" mean any fixed facility that transmits <br />and/or receives electromagnetic waves using FCC -licensed or unlicensed spectrum. It includes, but <br />is not limited to, antennas and/ or other types of equipment for the transmission or receipt of such <br />signals, poles, communications monopoles or similar structures supporting such equipment, related <br />accessory equipment, and other accessory installations. <br />City should add "Small Cells" definition specific to small cells as a type of wireless facility <br />attached to poles/structures in the ROW, different than a MACRO site. <br />--Section 33-236 (J) A description of three alternative sites that would also accommodate the <br />proposed Facilities, and a brief explanation as to why -the proposed site was selected ( Le., proximity <br />to power source). <br />This is a MACRO siting requirement section that should not apply to small cells site location <br />selection. There could be multiple small cells required in a defined area. <br />--Section 33-237 Applications for wireless facilities comprising a DAS shall be submitted <br />simultaneously and each Individual location within the system shall be processed and considered for <br />approval separately. Permitting fees will be assessed per application. <br />