NS-2954 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

6. Failure to comply with the Guidelines. 7. A substantive change of law affecting to the applicant's rights to occupy or use the PROW or the City's ability to impose regulations relating to such occupation or use. 8. A facility's interference with a City project. 9. A facility's interference with vehicular or pedestrian use of the PROW. 10. Failure to make a safe and timely restoration of the PROW or failure to address damage or disrepair with respect to the wireless facility and/or its supporting structure. 11. Circumstances arise under which failure to revoke the permit and remove the facility would result in hazardous or dangerous conditions, or otherwise compromise the safety of the PROW. (e) Notice of Action. A written determination of revocation shall be mailed to the applicant within ten (10) days of such determination. (f) An applicant whose permit has been revoked may have the revocation reviewed, upon written appeal as follows: 1. Within fourteen (14) days of the revocation, a written appeal shall be filed with the Director. The appeal must contain a statement listing the reasons why the applicant believes that the revocation should be reviewed. The Director shall render a decision within twenty-one (21) days of receipt of the statement described herein. 2. If the Director denies the appeal, the permittee may file a written notice of appeal with the City Council within twenty-one (21) days of notification of the Director's denial. The appeal to the City Council must contain a statement of any significant factors and/or hardships as well as alternatives explored, and a response to the findings of the Director that resulted in the denial. The appeal shall be conducted in accordance with Chapter 3 of this Code. Sec. 33-244. - Site Selection Guidelines and Criteria. (a) The Director may authorize new poles within the public rights-of-way, or wireless facilities in underground utility areas, only with a finding that such new pole or wireless facility, as applicable, is necessary to avoid prohibiting or having the effect of prohibiting the provision of personal wireless services pursuant to the United States Telecommunications Act of 1996 (47 U.S.C. §332(c)(7)(B)(i)(II)). (b) Traffic Obstruction. The placement of the facility shall not permanently impede vehicular or pedestrian traffic flow, nor shall such installation violate siting regulations imposed by the California Public Utilities Commission. (c) No modification to above -ground or at -grade facilities, including those related to size, color and shape of the housing, may be made by the applicant without first having obtained approval of the Director. Ordinance No. NS -2954 Page 13 of 20