My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CORRESPONDENCE - 11A
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2018
>
10/02/2018
>
CORRESPONDENCE - 11A
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/2/2018 3:26:42 PM
Creation date
10/2/2018 3:26:35 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Item #
11A
Date
10/2/2018
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Orozco, Norma <br />From: <br />Sent: <br />To: <br />Subject: <br />To whom it may concern; <br />Jill <br />Monday, August 20, 2018 2:48 PM <br />eComment <br />Overlay proposal for Elks Club parcel <br />I am writing to give some comments on the proposal for the 600+ units to be built on the parcel known as the Elks. I can <br />not make the Tuesday meeting and only just received the notice at my home last week. I currently own the property aqt <br />207 Wright, Santa Ana. I am a realtor by trade and feel this proposal will greatly damage the current property values in <br />the area for single family homes. We currently are struggling with parking Issues that I tried to address to the city with no <br />help. <br />So first why do I oppose? I love the idea of the street car and wish it would go further down 4th or 1 St street to the <br />freeway, I do not like the high density coming in to the neighborhood with no infrastructure to support It. You are allowing <br />for 1200 parking spots for the 600 units (2 per site),but nothing for the commercial use. Also in this area we have many <br />multiple households with 2-6 people with automobiles. Where will these people park? Where will these people shop, get <br />outside (no parks In area), and have recreation? You recently allowed the high density units on First St. and Cabrillo <br />which still have not fully sold. If they and these do not sell will they become rentals? Did Santa Ana not learn from the <br />Grisett era of high density building? All those apartments in Santa Ana which brought blight to the neighborhoods. If you <br />in addition put up another high density building on 4th St at Cabrillo that will bring about 8,000 people In to a square mile <br />area. There is a small park there but it is already over crowded. <br />I petitioned for permit parking 2 years ago on Wright St. The section closest to the Mayors home received the permits, my <br />area did not. There are many absentee landlords and multiple family units. I have parking for my area but the other <br />homes do not. We are getting overflow from the apartments on Lyon and First Street. Also there are transient motor <br />homes parking on Palm St. regularly. I also petitioned for Palm but was told that since there was a commercial building <br />there we could not go permit. That property has a large parking lot and does not use street parking. We are riddled with <br />trash, beer bottles. people urinating in our yards, etc. What will happen when you have 1800 people with 1200 parking <br />spots. They will come to our areas also and over whelm the residential neighborhood. <br />All of this will decrease our values and bring crime into our area. I was told the Zoo wanted that area for a parking lot, <br />why not sell it to them and make a better use of the property for something that is really needed. <br />Sincerely, <br />JIII Spencer <br />Broke Real Estate <br />n
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.