My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
60A - SENIOR RENTAL DENSITY BONUS
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2018
>
10/16/2018
>
60A - SENIOR RENTAL DENSITY BONUS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/12/2018 2:57:55 PM
Creation date
10/12/2018 2:52:04 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
Community Development
Item #
60A
Date
10/16/2018
Destruction Year
2023
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
50
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
roll IMM : 11W% <br />SPR No. 2017-081DBA No: 2017=01 <br />September 11, 2017 <br />Page 5 <br />Issue or Topic <br />Question <br />Analysis <br />Consistency with the <br />Does the project meet the <br />Although the project complies with many development <br />MEMU development_ <br />ME44U regulating plans <br />standards enumerated in the MEMU regulating plan, if does <br />standards <br />development standards, or <br />not meet the requirements for publicly -accessible .open <br />does it require approval of <br />space, building setbacks, and driveway widths. These <br />deviations? <br />standards require approval of incenliveslwaivers through the <br />Density Bonus AbreemenI.application. Moreover, although <br />slated as a guideline.in the regulating plan, the unit sizes are <br />well below the,1,200-square-foot average unit size objective:. <br />The applicant has considered this,gtd <br />ueline and. proposes to. <br />conipensale through a greater average privatelcommon open' <br />space area of 112 square feet per unit instead of the 100 - <br />square -foot minimum. In addition, the proposed parking, rate <br />of 0.5 spaces per unit is well below the required 2.0spaces <br />per unit; however, the applicant is exercising his ability under <br />AB 744 to provide 0.5 spaces per unit due to the project site's <br />proximity to two bus stops with frequent service. Theso'stops <br />are on lines that connect the project site to points west <br />(central Santa Ana, Garden Grove, and Westminster), north <br />(Tustin, Orange, and Placentia), and east (central Tustin). <br />Compatibility with <br />Will the project be well- <br />The proposed development consists of a single six -level <br />adjacent <br />integrated into the existing <br />project surrounded by single -story structures to the east and <br />development in terms <br />MEMO area and surrounding <br />west. A tbvo-story multiple -family residential community abuts <br />of similarity in scale. <br />development patterns, <br />the site to the south, and a ,single -story commercial <br />height, and site <br />including those in the city of <br />development is to the north across First Street. Although the <br />configuration <br />Tustin? <br />MEMU anticipates developments of this scale or larger In the <br />"Active Urban" land use district, this development would be <br />the first of its size in its immediate vicinity. Several design <br />features have been incorporated Into the project to break up <br />its massing and to lessen its impacts on adjacent properties. <br />These include breaking up the building's west "elevation <br />through courtyards, setting back the building from the oast, <br />south, and west through a minimum 20400t wide fire lane, <br />and the planting of rapidly -greying eucalyptus trees with <br />minimum 20 -foot brown trunk height throughout. Finally, the <br />proposal to construct a'single structure instead of several Is <br />the result of the site's odd shape. Development on the site is <br />further complicated and constrained because the neighboring <br />parcel, although underutilized, is located in the jurisdiction of <br />the City of Tustin. <br />Compatible and <br />_ <br />Does the project, as <br />The proposed project Is intended to be a low -impact use. No <br />harmonious land <br />proposed, contribute <br />negative impacts from noise, air quality, aesthetics, or traffic <br />use(s), site design, <br />"positively to the area in which <br />are expected exceptfor temporary impacts arising during <br />and operational <br />it is located? <br />construction of the project. The site's design is intended to <br />standards <br />activate its frontage on First Street by providing flexible <br />community areas that can be programmed with activities or <br />temporary uses, and the landscape palette has been <br />carefully selected to minimize the site's Impact on the <br />surrounding low-rise land uses. <br />EXHIBIT 2 <br />60A-45 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.