Laserfiche WebLink
ss <br />LA -2018-016-08A <br />p94VVV Tua <br />0 OCT 0 4 2010 <br />Cities of Anaheim and Santa Ana <br />Memorandum of Understanding <br />Urban Areas Security Initiative 2017 <br />Since 2004, the federal Department of Homeland Security (DHS), through the State <br />of California's Office of Homeland Security (OHS), now known as California <br />Governor's Office of Emergency Services (CaIOES), as the State Administrative <br />Agency (SAA), has designated the Cities of Anaheim and Santa Ana (hereafter <br />referred to as "the Cities") as Urban Areas and awarded each jurisdiction grants <br />under the Urban Areas Security Initiative (UASI). UASI Grants have been awarded <br />yearly since 2004 with each cycle having a performance period of approximately two <br />years. In the 2004 and 2005 grant cycles, DHS awarded the funds and <br />subsequently required a Homeland Security Strategy from each of the Urban Areas. <br />Anaheim and Santa Ana submitted a joint Strategy which ultimately formed the basis <br />for Orange County's overall terrorism preparedness efforts. In addition, DWS <br />required an Initial Strategy Implementation Plan (ISIP) as an overview of how the <br />Cities planned to spend UASI grant funds. The Strategy and the ISIP were <br />approved for both grant cycles and project development and implementation Is on- <br />going. <br />2. Starting with the 2006 grant cycle and with subsequent grant cycles, and at the <br />direction of Congress, DHS has redefined the criteria by which Homeland Security <br />funds are awarded under the UASI. In addition to population and population density, <br />DHS mandates that funds be distributed based upon risk and need. Additionally, as <br />part of the funding process, the latter grant cycles require a competitive application <br />process and the development of Investment Justifications to define how the Urban <br />Areas intend to spend requested funds. These changes make it clear that simply <br />because cities are eligible as a high-risk destination doesn't end the analysis, it <br />begins the analysis. The analysis then has to consider what needs the cities are <br />going to address with the particular Investments proposed. Only when the <br />investment is justified will the money flow to the cities that are otherwise eligible. <br />This process ensures that not only is DHS allocating funding based on risk and <br />need, but that the funding is being used to build the regional critical capabilities <br />consistent with the DHS goals and the priorities. <br />3. The Cities elected to define each Urban Area broadly to include all jurisdictions in <br />the county, as well as key disciplines, such as Health, Law, Fire, Emergency <br />Management and others as defined by DHS. Thus far, the grants have been <br />individually awarded to, and managed in all respects by, each City (Anaheim and <br />Santa Ana). The Cities have collaborated with the County of Orange and all other <br />jurisdictions to form a true partnership that has garnered acclaim from DHS, OHS <br />and Congress. The Cities have formed a true partnership with all stakeholders in <br />