My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10B - MINUTES 10-30-18
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2018
>
11/20/2018
>
10B - MINUTES 10-30-18
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/15/2018 9:04:47 PM
Creation date
11/15/2018 9:03:52 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
Clerk of the Council
Item #
10B
Date
11/20/2018
Destruction Year
2023
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Councilmember Tinajero, motion to support Map D-2, seconded by <br />Councilmember Sarmiento with comment. <br />Councilmember Sarmiento, asked if ordinance changed at 2nd reading would <br />require a first reading. Asked City Attorney to clarify effect of City Council map <br />selection if the voters do not approve Charter Amendment AA that is being <br />considered at the November 6, 2018 ballot. <br />Special Counsel Kimberly Hall Barslow, noted plaintiff would be able to enter <br />stipulated judgement with the court if voters do not approve ballot measure to <br />change Charter and resulting court order requiring City Council to change Charter <br />and to move forward to implement revised boundaries lines. <br />Councilmember Sarmiento, indicated selection of map will survive election <br />outcome and City Council would not be in breach of settlement agreement if voters <br />reject measure. <br />Councilmember Sarmiento, asked if there is a provision in the settlement <br />agreement that requires present City Council to oversee map change. <br />Special Counsel Barlow, outlined settlement agreement requirement to have City <br />Council select a map and to take effect upon election approval or upon entry of <br />stipulated judgment. Noted current City Council is authorized under the terms of <br />the settlement agreement to select a map before a new City Council is seated or <br />risk being in breach of agreement. <br />Mayor Pro Tem Martinez, clarified it is not up to voters or new City Council to <br />dictate how new wards should be drawn based on the settlement agreement. <br />Special Counsel Barlow, confirmed City Council has option to select new ward <br />boundaries and new maps may be chosen after 2020 census; noted any changes <br />to boundary lines must comply with the law and redistricting after census tend to <br />be minor. <br />Mayor Pro Tem Martinez, indicated previous opposition to item and lack of taking <br />comprehensive approach to address all concerns. Noted rapid change in the City, <br />benefits of waiting until census takes place, and lawsuit directed to current City <br />Council only. <br />Councilmember Solorio, opined importance of coming into compliance with <br />California Voters Right Act (CVRA), data reflects City has been disenfranchising <br />Vietnamese and Asian American voters, and need to consider community interest <br />in protecting lacy neighborhood and surrounding area. Noted difficulty in <br />addressing all interests in one map. <br />Councilmember Sarmiento, commented on importance of being receptive to the <br />Asian community, noted process is an imperfect process, and need to ensure no <br />detriment to the remaining community. Noted map will be reviewed after 2020 <br />census. <br />CITY COUNCIL MINUTES <br />1 OB -5 <br />OCTOBER 30, 2018 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.