Laserfiche WebLink
3. League of California Cities Presentation <br />Tony Cardenas advocated for the opposition of S3157, the Streamlining the <br />Rapid Evolution and Modernization of Leading-edge Infrastructure Necessary <br />to Enhance (STREAMLINE) Small Cell Deployment Act which limits the ability <br />of cities to determine the location, appearance, and size of wireless <br />infrastructure. Tony provided a sample letter of opposition and asked the City <br />to consider joining LOCC, perhaps lead the opposition with the Orange County <br />Fire Authority due to implications. <br />Tony advocated for the potential opposition of AB 2923, by Assembly Member <br />Chiu, a regional bill that would require the San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit <br />District (BART); this bill would give BART Local Land Use Authority over its <br />transit -oriented development zones. He stated that although it is a regional bill, <br />LOCC is taking an opposed position because it sets a precedence, and they <br />believe it violates Article 11 Section 11 of the Constitution. <br />Vice Chair Martinez stated she supports AB 2923 because the State is giving <br />local government rights that are much needed for economic development <br />opportunities near rail. <br />Chair Sarmiento stated that the needs for housing are so daunting that these <br />bills need to be looked at different. <br />Tony stated that the LOCC is involved in a ballot measure campaign to oppose <br />Proposition 6. The ballot measure proposes to repeal the Road Repair and <br />Accountability Act (a fuel tax), also known as SB 1. Tony asked on behalf of <br />LOCC that the City consider passing a resolution opposing Proposition 6. <br />Another ballot measure Tony mentioned is the Split Role on Property Taxes, <br />which is going to qualify for 2020, however, at this time LOCC does not <br />anticipate taking a position. <br />Chair Sarmiento and Vice Chair Martinez do not support AB 2923, but on the <br />Federal Inverse Condemnation the Federal item, there is no opposition. <br />Jorge Garcia stated that the City can take positions within its platform. <br />City Manager Godinez suggested taking Proposition 6 to the Big 11 Mayors <br />4. Development of the City Council Policy Regarding Violation of Code of <br />Conduct and Ethics <br />The Committee and staff discussed at length the various policy options for <br />consideration of sanctions, censure, disapproval and admonitions. The <br />committee members anonymously agreed and directed staff to take a receive <br />and file report to the City Council that recommends a status quo policy. The <br />City has a values based Code of Ethics and Conduct, thus, existing methods of <br />reporting both Brown Act and Political Reform Act violations are appropriate and <br />should remain. <br />Legislative Affairs, Ethics, Transparency al;rr-1olb�} ns Council Committee Meeting Minutes <br />Page 4 <br />