Laserfiche WebLink
EXHIBIT 4 <br />levels. Projects that create for -sale units must provide units at an affordable sales price to <br />households earning up to 110% of AMI. <br />Projects that provide new rental units must satisfy the 15% obligation with the following <br />breakdown: <br />• 9% of the total dwelling units at an affordable rent for moderate income households earning <br />up to 80% of AMI <br />• 6% made affordable to very low-income households earning up to 50% of AMI. <br />hicentives: The program offers developers incentives to provide housing on-site such as: an <br />increase in project density that would otherwise not be allowed; reduction in parking requirements; <br />reduction in minimum setback requirements; the ability to provide an alternative unit type as <br />compared to the market rate units; the ability to provide alternative, but functionally equivalent, <br />amenities than market rate units; and additional assistance from the city for such things as selling <br />and renting affordable units to qualified households. <br />Alternatives: The program allows for the alternatives listed below. <br />Off-site: Developers may provide affordable units off-site if at least 20% of the total units in the <br />residential development are affordable. For -sale affordable units must be available to households <br />earning no more than 110% of AMI. Rental projects must also satisfy the 20% obligation, but by <br />providing 12% of the total dwelling units in the project affordable to lower-income households <br />earning up to 60% of AMI, and 8% for very low-income households earning up to 50% of AMI. <br />In -Lieu Fee: Developers may pay a fee instead of constructing the affordable units within the <br />project. The current fees are $167,207 per inclusionary home and $125,000 per inclusionary unit <br />through June 30, 2019. These rates reflect the average city subsidy per unit, which is then applied <br />to the 20% requirement for the proportion of affordable units within the residential development. <br />Other alternatives include: <br />• Dedication of land instead of constructing inclusionary units <br />• Purchase or transfer of affordable housing credits between developers <br />• The acquisition and rehabilitation of existing market rate units for conversion to affordable <br />units <br />• Allowing developers to provide affordable units that are restricted by an agreement <br />between the developer and the United States Department of Housing and Urban <br />Development <br />• Allowing a developer to propose a combination of options outlined above. <br />Impact: Since San Jose's inclusionary program has only recently begun to fully operate, there is <br />no information currently available on how many affordable units have been created attributed to <br />the city's inclusionary housing program. <br />Housing Impact Fee Program <br />San Jose also established a Housing Impact Fee Program in 2014 and started collecting fees in <br />2016. The affordable housing impact fee applies to new small residential rental development (with <br />M• <br />