My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CORRESPONDENCE - 85B
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2018
>
12/04/2018
>
CORRESPONDENCE - 85B
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/5/2018 10:21:50 AM
Creation date
12/4/2018 9:13:25 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Item #
85B
Date
12/4/2018
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
45
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
1. Non -Payment of Rent; <br />2. Material Violation of the Rental/Lease Agreement; <br />3. Substantial Damage to the Rental Unit; <br />4. Nuisance; <br />5. Criminal/Unlawful Activity; <br />6. Refusing Access to the Unit; <br />7. Refusal to Agree to a New Rental/Lease Agreement with Substantially Similar Terms; <br />8. Substantial Rehabilitation of the Unit; <br />9. Owner Move -In; <br />10. Demolition; <br />11. Withdrawal of all the Rental Units on the Parcel from the Rental Market (Ellis Act). <br />C. Restrictions on the Permissible Reasons for Eviction <br />The above listed most -common permissible reasons for eviction appear on their face to be broadly <br />applicable. However, the provisions of the individual just cause eviction ordinances typically narrowly <br />define or otherwise restrict an owner's ability to invoke a permissible ground to complete an eviction. The <br />most common restrictions on the permissible reasons for eviction are discussed below. <br />D. Prior Written Warning <br />Just cause eviction ordinances usually require that a tenant be given a prior written warning (often <br />referred to as a "written notice to cease") before a tenant's violation of the lease or other offending <br />conduct, such as damaging the property or refusing access to the unit, may serve as the basis for <br />eviction. <br />For certain types of conduct, the warning requirement may also require the landlord to offer the tenant <br />additional ways to avoid eviction despite their bad conduct. For example, the just cause eviction <br />ordinance in Oakland states that a landlord may only evict a tenant who willfully and substantially <br />damages the rental unit after: (1) the tenant has been given a written notice to cease, and (2) the tenant <br />has refused to cease damaging the premises or has refused to either make satisfactory correction or to <br />pay the reasonable costs of repairing such damage "over a reasonable period of time." In effect, this <br />provision means that a landlord is required to offer a tenant a payment plan to pay for repairs to correct <br />damage that the tenant willfully caused and so long as the tenant agrees to the payment plan and to not <br />willfully damage the property again, the landlord cannot evict. <br />E. Certain Breaches of the Lease Excluded <br />Though breach of the lease by the tenant is listed as a permissible reason for eviction in just cause <br />eviction ordinances, the landlord's ability to evict for certain types of breaches is curtailed by many just <br />cause ordinances. The most common limitation relates to the landlord's ability to control who may live in <br />the unit. There are different variations on this type of restriction. The most common provisions provide <br />that a landlord cannot evict a tenant for violating a lease provision against subleasing if: (1) the tenant <br />continues to reside in the unit, (2) the sub -lessee is replacing a departed roommate on a one-to-one <br />basis, and (3) the landlord has "unreasonably withheld" the right to sublease. Some ordinances provide <br />that a landlord may not deny permission to sublease based on the proposed sub -lessee's lack of <br />creditworthiness. It is also becoming increasingly common for just cause eviction ordinances to prohibit a <br />landlord from evicting a tenant who has allowed specified family members (including children, parents, <br />grandchildren, grandparents, siblings, and spouses or domestic partners of such family members) to <br />occupy the unit, despite any limitations in the lease on the number of occupants or requirements that <br />new occupants must first apply and be approved. <br />California Apartment Association <br />www.caanet.arg <br />Revised 0512017— © 2017— All Rights Reserved I� <br />Page 2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.