25E - AGMT - OCCUPATIONAL MED SRVS

Home Browse Search

E. EXHIBIT F — CERTIFICATION OF NONDISCRIMINATION BY PROPOSER The Proposer shall submit a statement that it does not discriminate in its employment actions or services rendered, as per California and Federal law. F. EXHIBIT G — RESPONSIBLE PROPOSER — SUPPLtMtN IAL Wit, The Proposer'shall submit a detailed SAF with all questions answered. . G. EXHIBIT H — NONCOLLUSION AFFIDAVIT i The Proposer shall submit a statement whereby Proposer declares .that the proposal is not made in the interest of, or on behalf of, any undisclosed person,j partnership, company, association, organization, or corporation; and that the proposal is genuine and not collusive or sham. H. EXHIBIT I — Proposer shall submit an additional insured endorsement as per Exhibit I. i The proposal must be completely responsive to the RFP. Any exceptions to the requirements of this RFP must be included in the proposal. Such exceptions must be included as a separate element of the proposal entitled "Exceptions and Deviations." The Executive Director of Human Resources, in his sole and absolute discretion, may authorize or deny any exceptions. J. The City reserves the right to reject any or all proposals submitted and no representation is made hereby that any contract will be awarded pursuant to this RFP or otherwise. The City reserves the right to waive minor inconsistencies in submitted Proposals. XV. CONSULTANT SELECTION — PROPOSAL AND EVALUATION Proposal should be straightforward, concise and provide "layman" explanations of technical terms that are used. Emphasis should be concentrated on conforming to the RFP instructions, responding to the RFP requirements, and on providing a complete and clear description of the offer. Proposals which appear unrealistic in terms of technical commitments, lack of technical competence or are indicative of failure to comprehend the complexity and risk of this agreement may be rejected. The response to this RFP for Medical Services Review program should contain documentation of consultants and/or consultant's Department's credentials and expertise. Substantial consideration will be given to Consultants with demonstrable and documented experience in similar work. Responses will be evaluated on the following basis: 25% Qualifications and Experience 25% Understanding of Scope of Work 25% Demonstrated Knowledge of Medical Services Review program management 10% Cost competitiveness 10% Staff Availability 5% Responsiveness of the Proposing Firms and Fee Schedules The responses received will be reviewed by an evaluation committee appointed by the Executive f of Santa Ana Human Resources Department for Medical Services Review — August 27, 2018 26E=l 3