My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
75E - PH 2525 MAIN ST
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2019
>
02/05/2019
>
75E - PH 2525 MAIN ST
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/1/2019 4:04:49 PM
Creation date
2/1/2019 3:58:07 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
Planning & Building
Item #
75E
Date
2/5/2019
Destruction Year
2024
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
378
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
EXHIBIT A <br />9.13 Population and Housing <br />9.13.1 Population Growth <br />Threshold: Would the Project induce substantial population growth in an area, either directly or <br />indirectly? <br />Finding: Less than significant impact. (DEIR, p. 4.9-7 through 4.9-10.) <br />Facts in Support of Finding: As described in Section 4.9, Population and Housing, of the DEIR, the <br />Project would not induce substantial population growth. SCAG anticipates a population increase of 8.4 <br />percent by 2040 or an average annual increase of 0.4 percent throughout the County. The anticipated <br />population that would result from the Project would be 0.28 percent of the City's population, and thus, <br />within the projected population growth. Similarly, SCAG anticipates the number of housing units would <br />increase 6.3 percent or an average annual increase of 0.3 percent through 2040. Thus, the 496 new multi- <br />family units would also be within the SCAG projected growth. Furthermore, the infrastructure <br />improvements needed to serve the Project would be sized to specifically serve the development and excess <br />capacity would not be developed that could generate additional growth. Thus, impacts related to growth <br />would be less than significant. (DEIR, p. 4.9-7 through 4.9-10.) <br />For the reasons discussed above and the reasons discussed in the DEIR, impacts associated with this issue <br />would be less than significant, and no mitigation is required. (DEIR, p. 4.9-7 through 4.9-10.) <br />9.13.2 Displacement of Housing <br />Threshold: Would the Project displace substantial numbers of existing housing, necessitating the <br />construction of replacement housing elsewhere? <br />Finding: No impact. (DEIR, p.. 2-7; Initial Study, p. 51.) <br />Facts in Support of Finding: The Project site is currently developed for office uses and is void of any <br />existing residential development. As such, the Project would not displace any existing housing and <br />would not result in the construction of replacement housing elsewhere. <br />For the reasons discussed above and the reasons discussed in the DEIR and Initial Study, impacts <br />associated with this issue would be less than significant, and no mitigation is required. (Initial Study, p. <br />51.) <br />9.13.3 Displacement of Persons <br />Threshold: Would the Project displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the <br />construction of replacement housing elsewhere? <br />Finding: No impact. (DEIR, p. 2-7; Initial Study, p. 51.) <br />Facts in Support of Finding: The Project is currently developed for office uses and does not include any <br />residential uses. The Project would replace the existing office building with multi -family residential uses. <br />The Project would not displace any residents and would not result in the construction of replacement <br />housing elsewhere. <br />Resolution No. _ <br />Certification of the Magnolia at the Park EIR <br />75E-79 <br />Page 41 of 71 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.