My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
75E - PH 2525 MAIN ST
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2019
>
02/05/2019
>
75E - PH 2525 MAIN ST
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/1/2019 4:04:49 PM
Creation date
2/1/2019 3:58:07 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
Planning & Building
Item #
75E
Date
2/5/2019
Destruction Year
2024
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
378
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
EXHIBIT A <br />parking structure. In addition, interior recreation facilities include a 5,397 -square foot fitness center and a <br />1,566 square foot wellness pavilion. These onsite amenities are anticipated to meet many of the park and <br />recreation needs of Project residents. <br />The new residential population that would be generated from the Project is also anticipated to utilize <br />existing off-site park and recreation facilities. There is currently 93.8 acres of Santa Ana parkland within <br />3 -miles of the Project site. Based on the existing amount of park and recreation facilities in the vicinity of <br />the Project site, the recreation facilities that would be provided as part of the Project, and the number of <br />residents at full capacity of the Project, the Project is not anticipated to require the provision of new or <br />physically altered park facilities in order to maintain acceptable service ratios. In addition, the Santa Ana <br />Municipal Code, Section 35-108 requires that residential development fees be paid for the acquisition, <br />construction, and renovation of park and recreation facilities to preserve an appropriate balance between <br />the demand by residents for use of park and recreational facilities and the availability of such facilities. <br />Thus, by payment of the required park fees, the Project would provide funding to offset any increased <br />usage at other park and recreation facilities. Overall, the Project would not result in substantial physical <br />deterioration of park and recreation facilities. (DEIR, p. 4.10-12 through 4.10-13.) <br />For the reasons discussed above and the reasons discussed in the DEIR, impacts associated with this issue <br />would be less than significant, and no mitigation is required. (DEIR, p. 4.10-12 through 4.10-13.) <br />9.14.5 Existing Recreational Facilities <br />Threshold: Would the Project increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or <br />other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be <br />accelerated? <br />Finding: Less than significant impact. (DEIR, p. 4.10-13 through 4.10-14.) <br />Facts in Support of Finding: The Project would provide onsite open space and recreational facilities for <br />residents, which is anticipated to reduce the Project's impact on off-site recreational facilities. Moreover, <br />based on the existing amount of park and recreational facilities in the Project site's vicinity, the <br />recreational facilities that would be provided as part of the Project, and the anticipated number of residents <br />at the Project, the Project is not anticipated to increase the use of existing parks and recreational facilities <br />such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would be accelerated. <br />In addition, the Santa Ana Municipal Code, Section 35-108 requires that residential development fees be <br />paid for the acquisition, construction, and renovation of park and recreation facilities to preserve an <br />appropriate balance between the demand by residents for use of park and recreational facilities and the <br />availability of such facilities. Thus, by payment of the required park fees, the Project would provide <br />funding to offset any increased usage at other park and recreation facilities. Overall, the Project would not <br />result in substantial physical deterioration of park and recreation facilities <br />For the reasons discussed above and the reasons discussed in the DEIR, impacts associated with this issue <br />would be less than significant, and no mitigation is required. (DEIR, p. 4.10-13 through 4.10-14.) <br />Resolution No. _ <br />Certification of the Magnolia at the Park EIR <br />75E-82 <br />Page 44 of 71 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.