My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
75E - PH 2525 MAIN ST
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2019
>
02/05/2019
>
75E - PH 2525 MAIN ST
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/1/2019 4:04:49 PM
Creation date
2/1/2019 3:58:07 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
Planning & Building
Item #
75E
Date
2/5/2019
Destruction Year
2024
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
378
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
EXHIBIT A <br />9.17.6 Greenhouse Gas Emissions <br />All GHG emissions are assessed in a cumulative context because no single project can cause a discernible <br />change to climate. AB 32 recognizes the significance of the statewide cumulative impact of GHG <br />emissions from sources throughout the state and sets a performance standard for mitigation of that <br />cumulative impact. Therefore, analysis of GHG emission impacts under CEQA contained in the EIR <br />effectively constitutes an analysis of a project's contribution to the significant cumulative impact of GHG <br />emissions. As described in DEIR Section 4.5 Greenhouse Gas Emissions, the estimated GHG emissions <br />from construction and operation of the proposed Project would be lower than the AQMD Tier 4 Option 3 <br />threshold of 4.8 MTCO2e per year per service population. Therefore, the Project would not result in a <br />cumulatively considerable impact related to GHG emissions, and cumulative impacts would be less than <br />significant. For these reasons discussed in the DEIR, the Project's cumulative effects on greenhouse gas <br />emissions would not be cumulatively considerable. (DEIR, pp. 4.5-13.) <br />9.17.7 Hazards and Hazardous Materials <br />Hazard related impacts typically occur in a local or site-specific context versus a cumulative context <br />combined with other development projects; although it is possible for combined effects of hazards to occur <br />by adjacent cumulative development that involves hazardous risks. The closest cumulative project is the <br />2700 North Main Street residential development that is located 0.2 miles north of the Project site. Due to <br />this distance, the potential from hazards to cumulatively increase is limited. In addition, compliance with <br />the relevant federal, state, and local regulations during the construction and operation of related projects <br />would ensure that cumulative impacts from hazardous materials would be less than significant. With <br />implementation of Mitigation Measure HAZ-1, implementation of the Project would not result in the <br />release of hazardous materials into the environment; and therefore, would not result in a cumulative <br />contribution to a hazardous materials impact. Therefore, cumulative impacts related to hazardous <br />materials during construction would be less than significant. <br />In addition, the nearby projects provide residential and commercial uses, that would use the same type of <br />limited hazardous materials as the proposed Project. With regular use and storage of these commonly used <br />household products, such as would occur on the Project site, cumulative impacts would not occur. <br />For these reasons detailed in the DEIR, the Project's cumulative effects relating to hazards and hazardous <br />materials would not be cumulatively considerable when considered with past, current, and future probable <br />projects. (DEIR, pp. 4.6-8 through 4.6-9.) <br />9.17.8 Hydrology and Water Quality <br />The Initial Study (DEIR Appendix A) details that Section 18-156 of the City of Santa Ana Municipal <br />Code requires all new development and significant redevelopment within the City be undertaken in <br />accordance with the County Drainage Area Management Plan (DAMP), including but not limited to the <br />development project guidance; and any conditions and requirements established by City agencies related <br />to the reduction or elimination of pollutants in storm water runoff from the Project site, which are verified <br />prior to the issuance by the City of a grading permit or building permit. The DAMP requires <br />implementation of site design, source control and treatment control Best Management Practices (BMPs). <br />Resolution No. <br />Certification of the Magnolia at the Park EIR <br />75E-91 <br />Page 53 of 71 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.