My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CORRESPONDENCE - 75E (IN OPPOSITION)
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2019
>
02/05/2019
>
CORRESPONDENCE - 75E (IN OPPOSITION)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2019 12:11:19 PM
Creation date
2/19/2019 10:30:59 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Item #
75E
Date
2/5/2019
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
375
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Orozco, Norma <br />From: Timothy Basalone < <br />Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2019 12:38 PM <br />To: Pulido, Miguel; Sarmiento, Vicente; Penaloza, David; Solorio, Jose; Reyna, Roman; <br />Villegas, Juan; Iglesias, Cecilia; eComment <br />Subject: 2525 Main Street project - Public Comment Opposing Project. <br />Honorable Mayor Pulido and Council Members, <br />My name is Tim Basalone. I live at 2248 N. Spurgeon Street in the Park <br />Santiago neighborhood of Santa Ana with my wife and two young children. <br />The purpose of this email is to state my opposition of the proposed 2525 Main <br />Street project. <br />Throughout the application process for this proposed high-density, 5 -plus <br />story, 500 unit apartment complex, it has become very apparent that the <br />proposed development was hastily conceived and the subsequent EIR was <br />inherently flawed, confusing and incorrect in many areas. <br />As you know, the City of Santa Ana Planning Commission reviewed the <br />application and concluded that the proposed development simply does not fit <br />the proposed location and expressed their opinion that it would negatively <br />impact, not only the Park Santiago neighborhood but also the entire North <br />Main Street corridor and entry point into the City. <br />I was impressed with the way the Commissioners adeptly zero'd-in on many of <br />the apparent flaws in the proposed project and picked apart many of the key <br />assumptions and conclusions in the EIR. Their questions were smart and <br />direct and surrounded the inevitable stress to the area from increased traffic <br />congestion on Main Street and Edgewood, parking issues, and many other <br />questionable assertions made by the applicant/developer. Questions that the <br />applicant was unable to adequately answer. <br />The subsequent vote of the Commission at their January 14, 2019 meeting <br />resulted in a 4-2 vote denying the project, including denial of the EIR, the <br />General Plan Amendment, the Developer Agreement, and the Application for <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.