My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CORRESPONDENCE - 75E (IN OPPOSITION)
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2019
>
02/05/2019
>
CORRESPONDENCE - 75E (IN OPPOSITION)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2019 12:11:19 PM
Creation date
2/19/2019 10:30:59 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Item #
75E
Date
2/5/2019
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
375
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
much lower density. I have some ideas about creating a real buffer between this project and the existing <br />neighborhood ( not the proposed "fire lane"). <br />Perhaps a better use of this land would be for sale units aimed toward a mix of first time buyers and workforce <br />housing. In light of the nearby large scale existing and proposed apartments across the park and at Main place. <br />In my opinion we have plenty of apartments but are sorely lacking entry level housing. The massive millennial <br />generation is just beginning to buy their first homes and need some where near jobs and transportation where <br />they can get started in the home ownership cycle we have all benefited from. <br />Reasons to turn down this project: <br />1. unreasonably high density <br />2. view destruction of existing homeowners/voters 3. esthetically unpleasing and incompatible 4. unproven <br />need for this project vs other uses 5. damaging to a neighborhood filled with historic homes 6. Massive <br />shadow everyday across Park Santiago <br />Pleas ask yourself it you would want this in your own back yard? <br />PHIL SCHAEFER <br />Realtor <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.