CORRESPONDENCE - 75E (IN OPPOSITION)

Home Browse Search

littps://outlook.live.com/mail/sentitems/id/AQNIkADAwATEO... However, businesses also look at where people work. A class A office building with a healthy supply of workers just as easily contributes to gyms, grocery stores, and other amenities. Tim, I share your view that good, high quality apartments are worthwhile in any community. Perhaps a project with half the density would have eventually won the hearts and minds of area residents. The monolith proposed doesn't do it. I would of course go hand in hand with you to City Hall to demand funding for code enforcement and then adopt a design ordinance which would require landlords in Santa Ana to dramatically improve their rental product. Tim, I know you quite well and do not believe you are making your case out of interest or loyalty to one party or another. As for me, again, I am typically pro -development and pro -developer. Nevertheless, once in a while you see a project like this that just jumps off the page as being so out of whack you have to say something. Interestingly, I heard many colleagues in the development field say the same thing at the hearings. I share your view that the project can be made better. However, I don't see it happening. Better would mean (IMHO) a dramatic drop in density at the very least. What is needed here is for a complete analysis and update of the General Plan well before the City Council considers this. I think that is really one of the biggest problems with this project. The General Plan assumes that this site would have fit in with a much larger mixed use development for the area that was planned in the late 90s. That project included a convention center and people mover. That project of course was never built and designations of the site for a "node' are at best an outdated appendage of a plan that was never built. My prediction is the developer will shave off another 5% or so, beef up the parking, add some more landscaping, and throw some more money at the park. He will then come back to the City and try to portray himself as being the victim of NIMBY neighbors. I think its going to be close but my sense is he has already been briefing Councilmembers. Although the Planning Commission voted against, I think Benvanides' comments foreshadow how the Council will go but time will tell and Park Santiago and other neighborhoods are not backing down. It will be interesting. 1 have previously opposed the project in writing and will likely send another letter to Council opposing it. If that fails, I hope the City's staff does a better job at getting more meaningful concessions. For my friend Tim -please feel free to stop by for some coffee. I also roast it myself and have a bag of freshly roasted coffee waiting for you. Cooking Post santaana.org New18h ago • 29 neighborhoods in General From: Diane Fradkin Sent: Friday, January 25, 2019 8:04 PM To: mpulido@santa-ana.org; ciglesias@santa-ana.org; JSolorio@santa-ana.org; dpenaloza@santa- 5 of 6 2/11/2019.3:25 PM