My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CORRESPONDENCE - 75E (IN OPPOSITION)
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2019
>
02/05/2019
>
CORRESPONDENCE - 75E (IN OPPOSITION)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2019 12:11:19 PM
Creation date
2/19/2019 10:30:59 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Item #
75E
Date
2/5/2019
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
375
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Received at City Council <br />Meeting 2/19/2019 <br />From: Pamela E Angell < <br />To: Selena Kelaher<*elaher@santa-ana.grg> <br />Sent: Wednesday, October 3, 2018, 8:25:41 PM PDT <br />Subject: Draft Environmental Impact Report (DIER) for proposed development at 2525 N. Main Street, <br />Santa Ana, State Clearing House #2018021031; City of Santa Ana DP No, 2017-34 <br />Selena Kelaher, <br />I am opposed to the proposed development at 2525 N Main Street, Santa Ana. This <br />project will severely impact the quality of life for the residents of Park Santiago. <br />Santa Ana is second in density in the state of California, San Francisco being first. The <br />increase of 12 times the density with the proposed project is not consistent with <br />protecting <br />our Park Santiago neighborhood. <br />The regional transportation plan is false, we will not receive new shopping or <br />employment opportunities from the project. The proposed project is not consistent with <br />the Main Street <br />Concourse. The City of Santa Ana General Plan, Urban Design Element, the Main <br />Street Concourse Node is not described as multifamily. <br />The DER study does not address the increase of traffic at the I-5/Main and SR <br />22/Main/Town &Country, or the impact of traffic as additional proposed building. Their <br />DER <br />should be reissued with cumulative impacts compared to 2020 and 2040 conditions <br />clearly addressed. The only traffic study I saw was on Edgewood, for a short time. <br />The proposed project will not only impact Edgewood, but ALL streets in Park <br />Santiago. Many drivers already cut through our neighborhood (from 1-5 17th Street off <br />ramp) <br />to access Main Street and not have to sit thru several lights. They also cut thru Park <br />Santiago to get to the 1-5 freeway. <br />The state of California is in constant drought conditions. I don't believe being told that <br />Santa Ana has plenty of water is true. If we have to watch our water usage, how is it <br />that the proposed project will have all the water they need. In the 30 plus years I have <br />lived in Park Santiago, I have seen a lot of sewer maintenance being done. Is our <br />infrastructure old and outdated? How can it accommodate the additional usage of the <br />proposed project? <br />The proposed project will put Park Santiago residents in danger. The occupants of the <br />proposed project will be parking on Edgewood, and all over the neighborhood. <br />When you have cars parked on both sides of the streets in Park Santiago (example: <br />Santa Clara & Edgewood) it becomes a one lane road. It will be difficult for emergency <br />vehicles to travel the very narrow one lane, created by parking on both sides of the <br />street. Only one car can get thru at a time, and one car has to wait. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.