CORRESPONDENCE - 75E (IN OPPOSITION)

Home Browse Search

9. Table 4.7.2 Housing Element. 9.1. Goal 1. The proposed project is not consistent with Goal 1 as it does not provide for ownership. 9.2. Policy HE -2:3. The proposed project is inconsistent with Policy HE -2:3. The high rents would require more than 1/3 of income of moderate income households. No low income housing is provided. 10. Table 4.7.2 Land Use Element. 10.1. Policy 2.10. The proposed project is not consistent with Policy 2.10. The proposed project is NOT harmonious in scale and density with the adjacent Park'Santiago neighborhood. The proposed project has a density of 84 DW/A, which is 12 times the density of Park Santiago. 10.2. Policy 5.1. The proposed project is not consistent with Policy 5.2. The proposed project has no net benefit on the adjacent neighborhoods, and does not enhance quality of life of current residents of adjacent neighborhoods. 10.3. Poticy 5.2. The proposed project is NOT consistent with Policy 5.2. The proposed proiect is Incompatible with the adjacent Park Santiago neighborhood. Park Santiago is a Single Famlly Residential neighborhood with a density of 7 DW/A. The proposed project has a density of 84 DW/A, which is 12 times the density of Park Santiago, and not compatible. When the Park Santiago residents were surveyed for their preference for the protect site, 96% of the respondents were against high density multifamily housing for the site. 77% of the respondents wanted to iffy to keep the zoning as Professional. The residents of the adjacent Park Santiago consider the proposed project as an incompatible land use for the community. 10.4. Policy S.S. The proposed project is not consistent with Policy S.S. The proposed project is not compatible with surrounding land uses. The proposed proiect has a density of 84 DW/A which is 12 times more dense than the adiacent Park Santiago neighborhood. The residents of the adjaglapI ParkS0ntiago.do.not conslderthe-proposed oroiect as.comraattible with anyi supportive of the adjacent land use. 11. Table 4.7.2 Open Space, Parks, and Recreation Element 11.1. Objective 1.1. The proposed project is not consistent with Objective 1.1.Option B is mentioned; however, Option 8 is not part of the proposed project, and is unlikely to be implemented based on other sections of this DEIR_ 11.2. Objective 2.1. The proposed project is not consistent with Objective 2.1. Option B is mentioned; however, Option B is not part of the proposed project, and is unlikely to be implemented based on other sections of this DEIR. 12. Table 4.7.2 Urban Design Element. 12.1. Policy 2.2. The proposed project is not consistent with Policy 2.2. The proposed project is much larger in scale and bulk than the adjacent Park Santiago neighborhood, andisnot consistent with the existing pattern of development of Park Santiago. Park Santiago is a neighborhood of single family residences that are individual and unique. A large, dense, multifamily development is not consistent in design with the Park Santiago neighborhood. 12.2. Policy 2.11. The proposed project is not consistent with Policy 2.11. The proposed project is opposite to the established character of the adjacent Park Santiago neighborhood. Park Santiago is a neighborhood of single family residences that are individual and unique. A large, dense, multi -family development is In opposition to established character of the Park Santiago neighborhood, 12.3. Goal 7. The proposed project is not consistent with Goal 7. A dense, multifamily housing development does not provide a sense of arrival. 12.4. Policy 7.1. The proposed project is not consistent with Policy 7.1 A dense, multifamily housing development is not a gateway. 12.5. Policy 7.4. The proposed project is not consistent with Policy 7.4 A dense, multifamily housing development is not a gateway. 13. Zoning Code. The proposed proiect is not consistent with the existing zoning of Professional.'Ail text in thissectitrn that aliscussthe arop!osed't-reject conBistency with -a proposed change in the zoning as invalid, as the zoning at the time of the DEIR is Professional. All text that evaluates the impacts of the proposed project to any zoning that is not the