My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CORRESPONDENCE - 75E (IN OPPOSITION)
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2019
>
02/05/2019
>
CORRESPONDENCE - 75E (IN OPPOSITION)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2019 12:11:19 PM
Creation date
2/19/2019 10:30:59 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Item #
75E
Date
2/5/2019
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
375
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
https://outlook.live. coin/mail/sentitems/id/AQMkADAwATEO... <br />Received at City Council <br />Meeting 2/19/2019 <br />Fw: Article on 2525 N. Main St. <br />Diane Fradkin <br />Sun 10/21/2018 928 PM <br />To: mthai@santa-ana.org <mthai@santa-ana.org> <br />From: Diane Fradkin <br />Sent: Sunday, October 21, 2018 7:44 PM <br />To: mmcloughlin@santa-ana.org; ccontreras-leo@santa-ana.org; Iverino@santa-ana.org; <br />ealderete@santa-ana.org; knguyen@santa-ana.org; rreyna@santa-ana.org; bmendoza@santa-ana.org <br />Subject: Article on 2525 N. Main St. <br />Planning Commissioners: <br />http://newsantaana.cam/201$/10J20/a-developer-is-meddling-in-the-Santa-ana-city-council- <br />elections-in-order-to-build-a-controvers ial-apartment-complex _ <br />/?fbclid=iwAROP6POP�38zVihzuxdO4u K07m3bW io7eSVLwrf9n1NY9ZcANV9Q!XVgOVIp <br />This is deeply disturbing ..... what about the citizens of Santa Ana and the neighbors of Park <br />Santiago??? WE are the citizens YOU represent!!! Its important that you uphold the good <br />stewardship of development and 2525 N. Main St is not responsible development. Do you <br />really want this on your watch??? <br />I hope that at the hearing tomorrow you sincerely listen to your constituents ..... there are many <br />issues of this project that have not been resolved and its irresponsible to rush into an approval <br />until this project is completely understood. I think that as part of the Planning Commission you <br />would like time to review the EIR, particularly understanding whether the response to <br />comments are complete .... I believe that some of the issues are still unresolved and that the <br />methodology used is flawed. <br />I trust that you will do the right thing and not rush into this project without it being completely <br />vetted. Then you will know the right decision will be to direct the developer and staff to <br />redesign the project with 30/DUA as 84/DUA is too dense and intense at this location. <br />Sincerely, <br />Diane Fradkin <br />NrL�v <br />I of 1 2/11/2019, 3:36 PM <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.