My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CORRESPONDENCE - 75E (IN OPPOSITION)
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2019
>
02/05/2019
>
CORRESPONDENCE - 75E (IN OPPOSITION)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2019 12:11:19 PM
Creation date
2/19/2019 10:30:59 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Item #
75E
Date
2/5/2019
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
375
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Received at City Council <br />Meeting 2/19/2019 <br />Paul maize <br />From: <br />Paul maize < <br />Sent: <br />Sunday, April 15, 2018 9:46 PM <br />To: <br />'mpaulido@santa-ana.org' <br />Cc: <br />jsolorio@sant-ana.org'; 'mimartinez@santa-ana.org'; 'vsarmiento@sante-ana.org'; <br />'dbenavides@santa-ana.org'; 'stinajero@santa-ana.org' <br />Subject: <br />2525 Main Street - NO APARTMENTS NO REZONING <br />Honorable Mayor and Council members, <br />I am unable to attend this week's council meeting but I want to once again state our opposition to this project. As I <br />mentioned the last council meeting that I attended that this is the wrong project for this site. We continue to get the <br />feeling that the developer feels this is a slam dunk- why do they feel that way? It is not zoned for this project. The <br />original proposal is for a high density 517 unit apartment complex that literally backs up to our historic neighborhood. <br />On March 191 this Developer submitted a revised pan: 496- units, still at five stories, still unacceptable. <br />This proposed development, in combination with the addition of 1852 new apartment units within an half mile of its <br />location, is incompatible with the adjoining neighborhood. It's an inappropriate use of the land. For obvious reasons <br />the impacts to the neighborhood and surrounding areas would be devasting: increased traffic in a currently clogged <br />area, increased pollution, overcrowding, lack of neighborhood parking to name a few. <br />In January, NSAPA ensured every household obtained a survey card asking for their input on this project. The data was <br />collected, 96% opposed this project. The developer has made it clear to us that they are going forward with this project <br />as they do not have a back up plan. So once again we ask why is the developer so confident? What do they know that <br />we as a neighborhood do not know? We had 500 residents attending the Sunshine Ordinance meeting back in <br />November 2017, over 150 residents at the scooping meeting in March 2018 and the 170 plus letters submitted for EBR <br />input. This is not the project for this site. <br />This week we received a brochure from the developer, it was misleading in many ways and we hope that you realized it <br />is not truthful: <br />1. The picture shows Main street with only 4 cars on it! 1 have lived here 30 years and I have never seen only 4 cars <br />on Main street. Is the developer ill informed or just plan deceitful? <br />2. It claims that they are working with the neighbors to develop a site that fits with the fabric of the existing <br />neighborhood. This project does not ft with our existing neighborhood. Once again we feel the developer is <br />being deceitful. <br />3. Working with the neighbor to be a good neighbor. Then give us a project that doesn't change the current zoning <br />4. Designed with Park Santiago in mind based "on feedback from the neighbors". Did they not hear the 500 voices <br />against this project at the Sunshine meeting? All the yard signs through the neighborhood? NO APARTMENTS <br />NO REZONING <br />S. Keep the established trees. From the look of the pictures there are just palm trees on Edgewood, what <br />happened to the trees that are currently on that site? <br />6. It also doesn't show the parking structure which makes it more than 5 stories and would not be adequate for the <br />number of units they are proposing <br />7. It also doesn't show the veranda- how many stories will this project really be -6-7? <br />We hope that you will take into our valid concerns about this project into consideration and not award this developer <br />the right to rezone this property. They are not being honest with our neighborhood, we need you to act on our behalf <br />and not on behalf the developer. <br />Patty and Paul Maize <br />�\ 14 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.