My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CORRESPONDENCE - 75E (IN OPPOSITION)
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2019
>
02/05/2019
>
CORRESPONDENCE - 75E (IN OPPOSITION)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2019 12:11:19 PM
Creation date
2/19/2019 10:30:59 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Item #
75E
Date
2/5/2019
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
375
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
1,000's of cars traveling through PSNA. Who suffers? Oh wait, it's the hard working PSNA <br />families that will pay this price. <br />6. PARKING: I realized the owners/builders of 2525 Main Street think there is enough parking, but <br />they are only kidding themselves & they think we at PSNA don't have a brain to calculate the <br />math. Parking will be a huge issue. At 1.8 parking spaces per unit... let's think about this <br />logically. In a studio apartment & a 1 bedroom apartment, the builders are allocating 1.8 per <br />unit. Most people who are in a studio have a friend and/or spouse live with them... that's 2 cars <br />right there. In a 1 bedroom, the same will apply, plus there will be an extra person helping out <br />with the rent sleeping on the couch,.., therefore... that's 3 cars for the 1 bedroom. The 2 <br />bedroom are allotted 3.6 spaces. Most will have.4 cars and the 3 bedroom which is allotted 4.4 <br />cars per unit will probably have 5 or 6 cars. After all, in the proposal from 2/15/18, it was <br />stated, per their target demographics, that children would probably not be an issue,... so that <br />means more adults and more cars. Which means that cars will be parked all up and down <br />Edgewood, Bush & Spurgeon streets in the PSNA. Who pays the price for this decision? Oh <br />wait,... it's the hard working PSNA families that now can't even park in front of their own <br />homes, or have family & friends over to visit. And please don't say this won't happen, because <br />if you check out the East entrance to PSNA on Santa Clara and the Southern entrance to PSNA,... <br />there are cars parked up and down the street for blocks. Oh wait,... homeowners can solve this <br />by agreeing to parking permits (which the city loves because its more revenue to them)... but <br />wait... the whole street has to agree and each homeowner gets the honor of paying $70 per year <br />to the city of SA (which will go up each year, because you know our government... everything <br />goes up cost wise) just to have our family & friends come to visit us. None of the SA council <br />person would want this in front of their homes. <br />WATER: <br />OMGI I I Do the builders/owner NOT understand that we are in a drought here??? We are on a <br />water shortage as it is... and now you want to add 504 more apartments??? So who will suffer <br />from this decision,... oh wait,... it will be the hard working PSNA homeowners that actually set <br />an alarm clock, go to work each day and pay our taxes. There is not enough water to build <br />these complexes, as well as water for each resident... we are in a drought) I I <br />I am sure there is more to be added to this letter for Greenhouse Gas, Hazardous Materials and <br />the other CEQA issues. I will let others from PSNA address those issues. This whole building is a <br />BAD, BAD plan. Put it somewhere else that can handle the traffic, water & parking. There is no <br />room for an extra 1,000 cars in this vicinity. <br />Thank You Very Much, <br />V S <br />Peggy Steggell <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.